Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro fertilization programmed for weekday-only oocyte harvest: Analysis of outcome based on actual retrieval day

  • Clinical Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Our aim was to assess the effect of the day of ovum retrieval on outcome in an IVF program scheduled for weekday-only ovum retrievals.

Design: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent transvaginal ultrasound-guided ovum retrieval (TVUS-OR) in an IVF program from August 10, 1992, to April 30, 1993.

Setting: A university-based tertiary referral hospital center was the setting.

Participants and Methods: All patients (n=501) who underwent TVUS-OR were divided into three groups: (1) patients who underwent TVUS-OR on Monday; (2) patients who underwent retrieval on Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday; and (3) patients who underwent retrieval on Friday. All patients were induced by the same controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol, which consisted of a GnRH analogue “flare-up” followed by parenteral menotropins, after a scheduled oral contraceptive-induced menses. Patients and cycle characteristics in the three groups were compared and clinical outcome was evaluated.

Results: The similarity of patients and cycle characteristics confirmed the uniformity of the three groups. No difference was found in any of the clinical outcomes. However, in the first half of the program, we revealed a trend in which patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, requiring freezing all embryos and not allowing transfer during the treatment cycle, occurred more commonly in women whose retrieval occurred on Monday. This trend disappeared in the second half of the analysis.

Conclusions: In an in vitro fertilization program in which ovum retrievals occurred only on weekdays, no significant difference in outcome was found in patients undergoing ovum retrieval on Monday or Friday versus midweek. In addition to significant savings by eliminating weekend retrievals, IVF outcome is not compromised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tempelton A, Look PV, Lumsden MA, Angel R, Aitken J, Duncan AW, Baird DT: The recovery of preovulatory oocytes using fixed schedule of ovulation induction and follicles aspiration. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984;91:148–154

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wardle PG, Foster PA, Mitchel JD, McLaughlin EA, Williams JAC, Corrigan E, Ray BD, McDermott A, Hull MGR: Norethisterone treatment to control timing of the IVF cycle. Hum Reprod 1986;1:455–457

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Frydman R, Forman R, Rainhorn D, Belaisch-Allart J, Hazout A, Testart J: A new approach to follicular stimulation for in vitro fertilization programmed oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril 1986;46:657–662

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Patton PE, Burry KA, Wolf DP, Kiessling AA, Creamer MJ: The use of oral contraceptives to regulate oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril 1988;49(4):716–718

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gonen Y, Jackobson W, Casper RF: Gonadotropin suppression with oral contraceptives before in-vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990;53:282–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG, Walters DE: Observation on 767 pregnancies and 500 births after human in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1986;1:89–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleming R, Coutts JRT: Induction of multiple follicular growth in normally menstruating women with endogenous gonadotropin suppression. Fertil Steril 1986;45:226–230

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdalla HI, Barber R, Leonard T, Kirkland A, Mitchell A, Power M, Owen E, Studd JWW: Timed oocyte collection in an assisted conception program using GnRH analog. Hum Reprod 1989;4:927–930

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdalla HI, Leonard T, Barber R, Kirkland A, Stocker P, Owen E, Studd JWW: In-vitro fertilization. Br Med J 1988;296:1470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang SY, Lee CL, Wang ML, Hu ML, Lai YM, Chang MY, Soong YK: No detrimental effects in delaying initiation of gonadotropin administration after pituitary desensitization with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril 1993;59(1):183–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dimitry ES, Oskarsson T, Conaghan J, Margara R, Winston RML: Beneficial effects of a 24 h delay in human chorionic gonadotropin administration during in-vitro fertilization treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 1991;6:944–946

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan SL, Balen A, El Hussein E, Mills C, Campbell S, Yovich J, Jacobs HS: A prospective randomize study of the optimum timing of the human chorionic gonadotropin administration after pituitary desensitization in in-vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1992;57:1259–1264

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dimitry ES, Bates SA, Oskarsson T, Margara R, Winston RML: Programming in vitro fertilization for a 5- or 3-day week. Fertil Steril 1991;55:934–938

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Veeck LL: Oocyte assessment and biological performance. Ann NY Acad Sci 1988;541:259–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schenker JG, Weinstein D: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A current survey. Fertil Steril 1978;30:255–268

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Smitz J, Devroey P, Braeckmans P, Camus M, Khan I, Staessen C, Van Waesberghel L, Wisanto A, Van Steirteghem AC: Management of failed cycles in an IVF/GIFT program with a combination of a GnRH-a and hMG. Hum Reprod 1987;2:309–314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Porter RN, Smith W, Craft IL, Abdulwalid NA, Jacobs HS: Induction of ovulation for in vitro fertilization using buserelin and gonadotropins. Lancet 1984;2:1284–1285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Loumay E: The control of endogenous secretion of LH by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists during ovarian hyperstimulation for in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1990;5:357–376

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rutherford AJ: Improvement of in vitro fertilization after treatment with busereline, an agonist of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone. Br Med J 1988;296:1765–1768

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zorn JR, Boyer P, Guichard A: Never on Sunday: programming for IVF-ET and GIFT. Lancet 1987;1:385–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Golan A, Ron-El R, Herman A, Weinraub Z, Soffer Y, Caspi E: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following D-Trp-6 luteinizing hormone releasing hormone microcapsules and menotropin for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988;50:912–916

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Amso NN, Shaw RW, Ahuja KK, Morris N: Prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril 1991;55:220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Amso NN, Ahuja KK, Morris N, Shaw RW: The management of predicted ovarian hyperstimulation involving gonadotropin releasing hormone analog with elective cryopreservation of all pre-embryos. Fertil Steril 1990;53:1087–1090

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Horne G, Ibrahim ZH, Matson PL, Buck P, Lieberman BA: Management of ovarian hyperstimulation following ovulation induction with buserelin and human menopausal gonadotropin. J Obstet Gynecol 1990;10:330–332

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wada I, Matson PL, Troup SA, Morrol DR, Hunt L, Lieberman BA: Does elective cryopreservation of all embryos from woman at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome reduce the incidence of the condition? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:265–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Chetrit, A., Senoz, S. & Greenblatt, E.M. In vitro fertilization programmed for weekday-only oocyte harvest: Analysis of outcome based on actual retrieval day. J Assist Reprod Genet 14, 26–31 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765748

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765748

Key words

Navigation