Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 247–256 | Cite as

The function of mate guarding in a field cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllidae;Teleogryllus natalensis otte and cade)

  • Leon R. Hockham
  • Karim Vahed


Three hypotheses relating to the function of postcopulatory mate guarding were tested for the cricketTeleogryllus natalensis. The hypothesis that guarding allows the male to remain with the female for repeated matings was rejected. This was because the mean intercopulatory interval for maleT. natalensis was found to be nearly twice as long as the mean duration of guarding. Nor do the results provide evidence to support the hypothesis that guarding functions to prevent copulation attempts by rival males (the rival exclusion hypothesis): the presence of a rival male was found to have no significant effect on the duration of spermatophore attachment for either guarded or unguarded females. The results do, however, support a third hypothesis, namely, that guarding functions to prevent the female from removing the spermatophore ampulla before complete sperm transfer. As predicted by this hypothesis, the presence of a guarding male was found to have a significant positive effect on the duration of spermatophore attachment. Further support for this hypothesis was provided by the fact that there was a significant positive correlation between the duration of mate guarding and the duration of spermatophore attachment.

Key words

mate guarding Gryllidae Teleogryllus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, R. D. (1961). Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behaviour in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae).Behaviour 17: 130–223.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, R. D., and Otte, D. (1967). The evolution of genitalia and mating behaviour in crickets (Gryllidae) and other Orthoptera.Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 133: 1–62.Google Scholar
  3. Alcock, J. (1994). Post-insemination associations between males and females in insects: The mate guarding hypothesis.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, R. (1974).The Neural and Endocrine Control of Mating Behaviour in the Male House Cricket Acheta domesticus, Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.Google Scholar
  5. Eberhard, W. G. (1991). Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in insects.Biol. Rev. 66: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans, A. R. (1988). Mating systems and reproductive strategies in three Australian gryllid crickets:Bobilla victoriae Otte,Balamara gidya Otte andTeleogryllus commodus Walker (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Nemobiinae; Trigonidiinae; Gryllinae).Ethology 78: 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankino, W. A., and Sakaluk, S. K. (1994). Post-copulatory mate guarding delays promiscuous mating by female decorated crickets.Anim. Behav. 48: 1479–1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huber, F. (1955). Sitz und Bedeutung nervöser Zentren für Instinkthandlungen beim Männchen vonGryllus campestris L.Z. Tierpsychol. 12: 12–48.Google Scholar
  9. Khalifa, A. (1950). Sexual behaviour inGryllus domesticus L.Behaviour 2: 264–274.Google Scholar
  10. Loher, W., and Dambach, M (1989). Reproductive behaviour. In Huber, F., Moore, T. E., and Loher, W. (eds.),Cricket Behaviour and Neurobiology, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp. 43–82.Google Scholar
  11. Loher, W., and Rence, B. (1978). The mating behaviour ofTeleogryllus commodus (Walker) and its central and peripheral control.Z. Tierpsychol. 46: 225–259.Google Scholar
  12. McCallum, A. S. (1992).Male Mating Behaviour in the Crickets Acheta domesticusL. and Gryllus bimaculatusDeGeer (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): The Role of the Cerci and Other Abdominal Receptors, Ph.D. thesis, University of Derby, Derby.Google Scholar
  13. Sakaluk, S. K. (1984). Male crickets feed females to ensure complete sperm transfer.Science 223: 609–610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sakaluk, S. K. (1985). Spermatophore size and its role in the reproductive behaviour of the cricket,Gryllodes sigillatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae).Can. J. Zool. 63: 1652–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sakaluk, S. K. (1991). Post-copulatory mate guarding in decorated crickets.Anim. Behav. 41: 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sakaluk, S. K., and Cade, W. H. (1980). Female mating frequency and progeny production in singly and doubly mated house and field crickets.Can. J. Zool. 58: 404–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Simmons, L. W. (1988). Male size, mating potential and lifetime reproductive success in the field cricket.Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer).Anim. Behav. 36: 372–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Simmons, L. W. (1990). Post-copulatory guarding, female choice and the levels of gregarine infection in the field cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 403–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Simmons, L. W. (1991). On the post-copulatory guarding behaviour of male field crickets.Anim. Behav. 42: 504–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983).The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  21. Vahed, K. (1995).The Evolution and Function of the Spermatophylax in Bushcrickets (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae), Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leon R. Hockham
    • 1
  • Karim Vahed
    • 1
  1. 1.Insect Reproduction Research Group, Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of DerbyDerbyU.K.

Personalised recommendations