Advertisement

ECTJ

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 97–102 | Cite as

Interaction between attention directing and cogntiive style

  • Anthony A. Greco
  • Chris McClung
Articles
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Certain instructional techniques are more effective than others in teaching students who have a particular cognitive style. Analytic (field independent) and global (field dependent) styles of learning in 96 sixth graders were tested using two instructional design techniques. One slide/tape presentation was attentiondirecting; the other used supplementary sound. Both covered the same information. A factor analysis of variance of test scores was made using cognitive style and audio treatment as variables.

Keywords

Cognitive Style Instructional Material Global Subject Group Embed Figure Test Audio Narration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, W. H. Intellectual abilities and instructional media design.AV Communication Review, 1975, 23, 139–170.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, W. H., Cooney, S. M., & Weintraub, R.Audio implementation of still and motion pictures (Final Report, Project No. 5-0741, Grant No. OE-7-14-1490-261). Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1968.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, R. E. Adapting aptitude-treatment interaction methodology to instructional media research.AV Communication Review, 1975,23, 133–137.Google Scholar
  5. Coop, R. H., & Brown, L. D. Effects of cognitive style and teaching method on categories of achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970,61, 400–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Vesta, F. J. Trait-treatment interactions, cognitive processes and research on communication media.AV Communication Review, 1975,23, 185–196.Google Scholar
  7. Elliot, C. A.The effects of instructional designs matched to individual differences in cognitive styles on concept learning in geometry: A traittreatment interaction study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. Gagné, R. M., & Rohwer, W. D., Jr. Instructional psychology.Annual Review of Psychology, 1969,20, 381–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodenough, D. R. The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory.Psychology Bulletin, 1976,83, 675–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grieve, T. D., & Davis, J. K. The relationship of cognitive style to performance in ninth grade geography.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971,53, 110–118.Google Scholar
  11. Grippin, P. C., & Ohmacht, F. W.Field independence and dogmatism as mediators of performance on a programmed learning task with and without strong prompts (American Educational Research Association paper and symposia abstract). Washington, D.C.: AERA, 1974.Google Scholar
  12. Kelley, T. L. The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1939,30, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maginn, M. D.The effects of cognitive style on criterion test performance of high school students after instruction by audio tape treatments differing in rate and difficulty level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1975.Google Scholar
  14. May, M. A.Enhancements and simplifications of motivational and stimulus variables in audiovisual instructional materials. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, 1965.Google Scholar
  15. McClung, C.J. The effects of cognitive style on type of practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1976.Google Scholar
  16. Tukey, J. W. Comparing individual means in analysis of variance.Biometrics, 1949,5, 99–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Witkin, H. A., Dyke, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A.Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley and Sons, 1962.Google Scholar
  18. Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. Educational implications of cognitive style.Review of Educational Research, 1977,47, 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony A. Greco
    • 1
  • Chris McClung
    • 2
  1. 1.American Medical International, Inc.Beverly Hills
  2. 2.Tratec, Inc.Los Angeles

Personalised recommendations