, 47:10 | Cite as

Guiding elementary students to generate reading comprehension tests

  • Carol Brown
  • Carol A. Brown


Test Item Test Question Generative Learning Reading Passage TechTrends Volume 


  1. Dunlap, J. C. (1999). Rich environments for active learning on the Web: Guidelines and examples, In WebNet 99 World Conference on the WWW and Internet Proceedings, Honolulu, Hawaii. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED448709)Google Scholar
  2. Education Commission of the States (1999). : Accelerated Reader. Available: Education Commission of the States, 707 17th St., #2700, Denver, CO 80202–3427. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED447420)Google Scholar
  3. Houghton, R. S. (1994). Thinking Skill Levels-Adapted from Marzano for North Carolina Curriculum. Retrieved fromhttp-/ Houghton/Learner/Think94/ NCmarzanoThink.html Google Scholar
  4. Hyerle, D. (1996). Visual tools for constructing knowledge. Alexandria, VA:ASCDGoogle Scholar
  5. Hyerle, D. (2000). A field guide to using visual tools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  6. Marzano, Robert J. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: a framework for curriculum and instruction, Alexandria, Va. : ASCD.Google Scholar
  7. Marzano, Robert J. (1992). A different kind of classroom: teaching with dimensions of learning. Alexandria, VA:ASCD.Google Scholar
  8. Mathis, D. (1996). The effect of the Accelerated Reader program on reading comprehension. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 398555)Google Scholar
  9. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., and Kemp, J. E. (2001). Designing effective instruction, 3rd ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (1992-93). North Carolina End-of-Grade Testing Program. Available: Testing Section, Division of Accountability Services, NCDPI, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
  11. Popham, W. J., and Sirotnick, K. A. (1992). Understanding statistics in education. Itasca, ILL: E E. Peascock Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Turner, T. N. (1993). Improving reading comprehension achievement of sixth, seventh, and eighth grade underachievers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED372374)Google Scholar
  13. Volk, C., andRitchie, D. (1999). Comparison of generative learning strategies. In: Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service N. ED 436161)Google Scholar
  14. Wittrock, M. C. (1974). “Learning as a generative process”.Educational Psychologist, 11, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wittrock, M.C., and Alesandrini, K. (1990). “Generation of summaries and analogies and analytic and holistic abilities”.American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wittrock, M.C. (1991). “Generative teaching of comprehension”.The Elementary School Journal,92(2), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wittrock, M. C. (1992). “Generative learning processes of the brain”.Educational Psychologist, 27(4), 531–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol Brown
  • Carol A. Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Librarianship, Educational Technology, and Distance InstructionEast Carolina UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations