Advertisement

Statistical Papers

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 247–266 | Cite as

Bayesian decision criteria in the presence of noises under quadratic and absolute value loss functions

  • T. Pham-Gia
  • N. Turkhan
Article

Summary

Misclassifications, or noises, in the sampling stage of a Bayesian scheme can seriously affect the values of decision criteria such as the Bayes Risk and the Expected Value of Sample Information. This problem does not seem to be much addressed in the existing literature. In this article, using an approach based on hypergeometric functions and numerical computation, we study the effects of these noises under the two most important loss functions: the quadratic and the absolute value. A numerical example illustrates these effects in a representative case, using both loss functions, and provides additional insights into the general problem.

Keywords and Phrases

Noises Decision Beta distribution Square error loss Bayes risk Expected Value of Sample Information Hypergeometric functions Picard’s Theorem 

AMS Classification

62C10 62N10 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altman, D.G.,Practical Statistics for Medical research, Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. Exton, H.,Multiple Hypergeometric Functions and Applications, Chichester-Ellis Howard, London, 1976.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. French, S. and Rios Insua, D.,Statistical Decision Theory, Arnold, London, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. Gaba, A. and Winkler, R.L., Implications of Errors in Survey Data: a Bayesian Model,Management Science, 38, 1992, 913–925.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gaba, A. and Winkler, R.L., The Impact of Testing Errors on Value of Information: a Quality-Control Example,Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 10, 1995, 5–13.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hilton, R.W., The Determinants of Information Value: Synthesizing Some General Results,Management Science, 27, 1981, 57–64.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, N.J. and Kotz, S., Errors in Inspection and Grading: Distributional Aspects of Screening and Hierarchical Screening,Commun. in Stat-Theory-Meth, 1982, 1997–2016.Google Scholar
  8. Pham-Gia, T. and Turkhan, N., Sample Size Determination in Bayesian Analysis,The Statistician, 41, 389–398, 1992a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pham-Gia, T. and Turkhan, N., Information Loss in a Noisy Dichotomous Sampling Process,Commun. Statist.-Theory Meth., 21(7), 2000–2018, 1992b.Google Scholar
  10. Pham-Gia, T., Duong, Q. and Turkhan, N., Using the Mean Absolute Deviation to Determine the Prior Distribution.Stat. and Prob. Letters, 13, 373–381, 1992c.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pham-Gia, T. and Tranloc, H., The Mean Absolute Deviations.Mathl and Computer Modelling, 34, 2001, 921–936.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pham-Gia, T., Turkhan, N. and Bekker, A., An L1-Approach in the Bayesian Analysis of the mixing proportion,the Scandinavian Journ. of Stat., 2002, submitted.Google Scholar
  13. Rahali, B. and Foote, B.L., An Approach to Compensate for Uncertainty in Knowledge of Inspector Error,Journ. of Quality Technology, 14, 1982, 190–195.Google Scholar
  14. Rahme, E., Joseph, L. and Gyorkos, T.W., Bayesian Sample Size determination for Estimating Binomial Parameters from Data Subject to Misclassification.Appl. Statist., 49, 119–128, 2000.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Unnikhrishnan, N.K. and Kunte, S., Bayesian Analysis for Randomized Response Models.Sankhya: the Indian Journal of Statistics, 1999, 61, series B, 422–432.Google Scholar
  16. Winkler, R.L., Information Loss in Noisy and Dependent Processes, in: J.M. Bernardo, M.H. de Groot, D.V. Lindley and A.F.M. Smith (ed.),Bayesian Statistics 2, 559–570, Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, N.Y., 1985.Google Scholar
  17. Winkler, R.L. and Gaba, A., Inference with Imperfect Sampling from a Bernoulli Process, p. 303–317, inBayesian and Likelihood Methods in Statistics and Economics, S. Geisser, J.S. Hodges, S.J. Press and A. Zellner, Ed., Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1990, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Pham-Gia
    • 1
  • N. Turkhan
    • 1
  1. 1.Université de Moncton(Canada)

Personalised recommendations