Advertisement

Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 39–42 | Cite as

Effects of differences in forest floor and canopy vegetation on ectomycorrhizas ofBetula platyphylla var.japonica: A test using seedlings planted into soils taken from various sites

  • Yasushi Hashimoto
  • Mitsuro Hyakumachi
Short Communication

Abstract

Effects of different forest floor vegetation types in secondary forest and of conversion to plantation on the quality and quantity of ectomycorrhizas are mostly unknown.Betula platyphylla var.japonica seedlings were used for bioassays of ectomycorrhizal fungal inoculum using soils from four 50-year-oldB. platyphylla var.japonica forests that had different types of forest floor vegetation: two with shrub types, one with aSasa type, and one with a grass type. Seedlings were also grown in soil from a nearby monospecific plantation ofChamaecyparis obtusa. Ectomycorrhizas formed 13 to 26% of root length of seedlings grown in soil from the five different sites. The maximum percentage of ectomycorrhizal formation was obtained from the grass-type forest. The dominant type of ectomycorrhiza in the two shrub-type forest soils was the same as that in theSasa-type forest soil. The dominant types of ectomycorrhizas in the grass-type forest soil and in theC. obtusa plantation soil were different from that in the two shrub-type forest soils and in theSasa-type forest soil. The results of this investigation suggest that the type of forest floor vegetation, accompanied with changes in thickness of the A0 horizon, might affect the ectomycorrhizal fungi in the soils ofB. platyphylla var.japonica forests. Establishment of artificial plantations ofC. obtusa might change the ectomycorrhizal fungi that could associate withB. platyphylla var.japonica seedlings in soil.

Key words

Betula platyphylla var.japonica ectomycorrhizas forest floor vegetation plantation Sasa senanensis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Alexander, I.J. and Fairley, R.I. (1983) Effects of N fertilization on populations of fine roots and mycorrhizas in spruce humus. Plant Soil 71: 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amaranthus, M.P. and Perry, D.A. (1994) The functioning of ectomycorrhizal fungi in the field: Linkages in space and time. Plant Soil 159: 133–140.Google Scholar
  3. Dighton, J. and Mason, P.A. (1985) Mycorrhizal dynamics during forest tree development.In Developmental biology of higher fungi. Moore, D., Casselton, L.A., Wood, D.A., and Frankland, J.C. (eds.), 615pp, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 117–139.Google Scholar
  4. Frankland, J.C. and Harrison, A.F. (1985) Mycorrhizal infection ofBetula pendula andAcer pseudoplatanus: Relationships with seedling growth and soil factors. New Phytol. 101: 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hashimoto, Y. and Hyakumachi, M. (1998a) Effects of vegetation change and soil disturbance on ectomycorrhizas ofBetula platyphylla var.japonica: A test using seedlings planted into soils taken from various sites. Mycoscience 39: 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hashimoto, Y. and Hyakumachi, M. (1998b) Distribution of ectomycorrhizas and ectomycorrhizal fungal inoculum with soil depth in a birch forest. J. For. Res. 3: 243–245.Google Scholar
  7. Ingleby, K., Mason, P. A., Last, F. T., and Fleming, L. V. (1990) Identification of ectomycorrhizas. 112pp, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  8. Last, F.T., Dighton, J., and Mason, P.A. (1987) Succession of sheathing mycorrhizal fungi. Trees 2: 157–161.Google Scholar
  9. Meyer, F.H. (1973) Distribution of ectomycorrhizae in native and manmade forests.In Ectomycorrhizae: their ecology and physiology. Marks, G.C. and Kozlowsky, T.T. (eds.), Academic Press, New York, 79–105.Google Scholar
  10. Newton, A.C. (1991) Mineral nutrition and mycorrhizal infection of seedling oak and birch III. Epidemiological aspects of ectomycorrhizal infection, and the relationship to seedling growth. New Phytol. 117: 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Newton, A.C. and Pigott, C.D. (1991a) Mineral nutrition and mycorrhizal infection of seedling oak and birch I. Nutrient uptake and the development of mycorrhizal infection during seedling establishment. New Phytol. 117: 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Newton, A.C. and Pigott, C.D. (1991b) Mineral nutrition and mycorrhizal infection of seedling oak and birch II. The effect of fertilizers on growth, nutrient uptake and ectomycorrhizal infection. New Phytol. 117: 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Suzuki, S. (1961) Ecology of the bambusaseous generaSasa andSasamorpha in Kanto and Tohoku districts of Japan, with special reference to their geographical distribution. Ecol. Rev. 15: 131–147.Google Scholar
  14. Tennant, D. (1975) A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J. Ecol. 63: 995–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vogt, K.A., Edmons, R.L., and Grier, C.C. (1981) Seasonal changes in biomass and vertical distribution of mycorrhizal and fibroustextured conifer fine roots in 23- and 180-year-old subalpineAbies mabilis stands. Can. J. For. Res. 11: 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasushi Hashimoto
    • 1
  • Mitsuro Hyakumachi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Plant Disease Science, Faculty of AgricultureGifu UniversityGifuJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Genetic EcologyTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations