Abstract
The connections between inductive definability and models of comprehension are studied. Let = 〈A, R l, ...,R n 〉 be an infinite structure and letI φ be a set inductively defined by a formulaφ of the second order language. We prove that if is a model of Δ 11 -Comprehension relativized toφ, andφ is-absolute, then for everyη smaller than the height of (h()),I φ is in. If is aβ-structure which satisfies Σ 11 -Comprehension relativized toφ and WF(X), and φ is-absolute, thenI φ is in and ‖φ| <h (). These results imply that Barwise-Grilliot theorem is false in the case of uncountable acceptable structures. We also study the notion of invariant definability over models1 of Δ 11 -Comprehension.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K. R. Apt,ω-models in analytical hierarchy, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci.20 (1972), 901–904.
Y. N. Moschovakis,Elementary Induction on Abstract Structures, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974.
Y. N. Moschovakis,On monotone inductive definability, Fund. Math.82 (1974), 39–83.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is registered as Report ZW 69/76 of the Mathematical Centre.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Apt, K.R. Inductive definitions, models of comprehension and invariant definability. Israel J. Math. 29, 221–238 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02762011
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02762011