Capital rationing: The general case and a better criterion for ranking
- 117 Downloads
The definition of net present value implies that the reinvestment rate of return on the intermediate cash flows is equal to the risk-adjusted discount rate of the project. However, in many situations, the two rates are different. Therefore, in capital rationing, the ranking of projects based on net present value is incorrect in those situations. Another problem is that financial managers would prefer to use internal rate of return for ranking, although ranking by net present value is theoretically superior. This paper solves both problems by developing a new ranking criterion.
KeywordsCash Flow Good Criterion Liquid Asset Terminal Wealth Ranking Criterion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brigham, Eugene F., and Louis C. Gapenski. 1993.Intermediate Financial Management. 4th ed. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
- Emery, Douglas R., and John D. Finnerty. 1993.Principles of Finance with Corporate Applications. New York: West Publishing.Google Scholar
- Gitman, Lawrence J. 1995.Foundations of Managerial Finance. 4th ed. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Pinches, George E. 1994.Financial Management. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, Alan C. 1996.Modern Corporate Finance. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Weston, J. Fred, and Thomas E. Copeland. 1992.Managerial Finance. 4th ed. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar