Advertisement

Russian Journal of Marine Biology

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 241–249 | Cite as

Factors determining the spatial structure of benthic communities of a shallow bay

  • A. V. Ozolin'sh
Biocenology

Abstract

The species composition and the spatial structure of benthos were studied along a transect running at a depth of 1–18 m on the soft bottom substrates of Zapadnaya Bight of Furugelm Island (Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan). This area has been proposed as a major site for long-term monitoring of the Far Eastern State Marine Reserve. Hydrobiological samples of different sizes (16 cm2, 0.025, and 1 m2) were taken by a diving method at 5-m intervals from the shore. Benthic communities were distinguished using principal component analysis (PCA), Sørensen's similarity indices, and similarity dendrograms. The grain size composition of bottom sediment was determined. Three benthic communities at depths of 1–3, 4–8, and 14–18 m and two transitional zones were distinguished in Zapadnaya Bight. The benthic communities are characterized by a relative constancy of species composition within their boundaries, and by stable ratios of quantitative characteristics of other species from different ecological groups. The transitional zones, which are comparable in extension with the communities themselves, are characterized by changes in species composition and the presence of characteristic species; here, the substrate type changes and sediment grain sorting is decreased.

Key words

spatial structure communities benthos monitoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aleksandrov, D.A., On the Structure of Shallow-Water Benthos of the White Sea in Connection with Charting Problems,Problemy okhrany prirody v basseine Belogo morya (Problems of Nature Protection in the Basin of the White Sea), Murmansk, 1984, pp. 98–106.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burkovskii, I.V., Azovskii, A.I., Stolyarov, A.P., and Obridko, S.V., Structure of Intertidal Macrobenthos of the White Sea along a Pronounced Environmental Gradient,Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1995, no. 6, pp. 59–70.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vorobyev, V.P., Benthos of the Azov Sea,Tr. AzCherNIRO, Simferopol: Krymizdat, 1949, issue 13.Google Scholar
  4. 14.
    Nesis, K.N., General Ecological Concepts as Applied to Marine Communities. Community as a Continuum,Okeanologiya. Biologiya okeana (Oceanology. Biology of the Ocean), Moscow: Nauka, 1977, pt. 2, pp. 5–13.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Odum, E.,Basic Ecology, Philadelphia: Saunders, 1983, Translated under the titleEkologiya, Moscow: Mir, 1986.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ozolin'sh, A.V., Some Methodological Aspects of the Study of Spatial Structure of Bottom Fauna As Illustrated by Porya Inlet in the White Sea,Biol. Morya, 1987, no. 1, pp. 62–68.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ozolin'sh, A.V., Effect of Bottom Sediments on the Distribution of Polychaetes in the Far Eastern State Marine Reserve,Rasprostranenie i ekologiya sovremennykh i iskopaemykh morskikh organizmov (Distribution and Ecology of Recent and Fossil Marine Organisms), Vladivostok: Dalnev. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1990a, pp. 12–21.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozolin'sh, A.V., Distribution of Polychaetes on Soft Bottom Substrates in the Far Eastern State Marine Reserve (Sea of Japan): Structural Analysis,Zool. Zh., 1990b, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 25–36.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ozolin'sh, A.V., Structure of Polychaete Assemblages of the Far Eastern State Marine Reserve in Peter the Great Bay,Issled. fauny morei (Explorations of the Fauna of the Seas), 1992, issue 43 (51), pp. 157–165.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ozolin'sh, A.V. and Klimova, V.L., Soft Bottom Communities of the Far Eastern State Marine Reserve,Ekosistemnye issledovaniya pribrezhnykh soobshchestv zaliva Petra Velikogo (Near-Shore Ecosystem Studies in Peter the Great Bay), Vladivostok: Dalnev. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1991, pp. 40–58.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pesenko, Yu.A.,Printsipy i metody kolichestvennogo analiza v faunisticheskikh issledovaniyakh (Principles and Methods of Quantitative Analysis in Faunal Research), Moscow: Nauka, 1982.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pogrebov, V.B., Intertidal Brackish-Water Environment of a Semi-Enclosed Bay in the White Sea. III. Ordination of Species and Gradient Analysis,Vestn. L'vov. Gos. Univ., 1988, ser. 3, no. 4, pp. 8–17.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pogrebov, V.B. and Goryanina, O.O., Intertidal Brackish-Water Environment of a Semi-Enclosed Bay in the White Sea. II. Numerical Classification of the Biota,Vestn. L'vov. Gos. Univ., 1988, ser. 3, no. 3, pp. 21–28.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Archambault, P. and Bourget, E., Scales of Coastal Heterogeneity and Benthic Intertidal Species Richness, Diversity and Abundance,Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 1996, vol. 136, nos. 1–3, pp. 111–121.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ballesteros, E. and Romero, J., Zonation Patterns in Tideless Environments (Northwestern Mediterranean): Looking for Discontinuities in Species Distributions,Invest. Resq., 1988, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 595–616.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bellan-Santini, D., The Mediterranean Benthos: Reflections and Problems Raised by a Classification of the Benthic Assemblages,Mediterranean Marine Ecosystems (Proc. NATO ARW Mediterranean Mar. Ecosyst., Heraklion, Crete, Sept. 23–27, 1983), New York, 1985, pp. 19–48.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Butman, C.A. and Grassle, J.P., Active Habitat Selection byCapitella sp. 1 larvae. 1. Two-Choice Experiments in Still Water and Flume Flows,J. Exp. Mar. Res., 1992, vol. 50, pp. 669–715.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fager, E.W., Communities of Organisms,In the Sea, Interscience Publ., 1963, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 415–437.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gray, J.S., Animal-Sediment Relationships,Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev., 1974, no. 12, pp. 223–261.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grehen, A.J., Temporal Sediment Variability at a Shallow Bottom Muddy Site in Galway Bay, on the West Coast of Ireland: Some Implications for Larval Recruitment,Oceanis, 1990, vol. 16, pp. 149–161.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ishikawa, K., Relationship between Bottom Characteristics and Benthic Organisms in the Shallow Water of Oppa Bay, Miyagi,Mar. Biol., 1989, vol. 102, pp. 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jansson, B.O., The Significance of Grain Size and Pore Water Content for the Intersitial Fauna of Sandy Beaches,Oikos, 1967, vol. 18, pp. 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jumars, P.A. and Nowell, A.R.M., Fluid and Sediment Dynamic Effects on Marine Benthic Community Structure,Am. Zool., 1984, vol. 24, pp. 45–55.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miller, D.C., Bock, M.J., and Turner, E.J., Deposit and Suspension Feeding in Oscillatory Flows and Sediment Fluxes,J. Mar. Res., 1992, vol. 50, pp. 489–520.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mills, E.L., The Community Concept in Marine Zoology, with Comments on Continua and Instability in Some Marine Communities: A Review,J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 1969, vol. 26, pp. 1415–1428.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nichols, F.H., Benthic Polychaete Assemblages and Their Relationship to the Sediment in Port Madison, Washington,Mar. Biol., 1970, vol. 6, pp. 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nowell, A.R.M., Jumars, P.A., Self, R.F.L., and Southard, J.B., The Effects of Sediment Transport and Deposition on Infauna: Results Obtained in a Specially Designated Flume,Ecology of Marine Deposit Feeders, Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies, New York: Springer, 1989, no. 31, pp. 247–268.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Palmer, M.A. and Molloy, R.M., Water Flow and the Vertical Distribution of Meiofauna: A Flume Experiment,Estuaries, 1986, vol. 9, pp. 225–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Plante, C.J., Jumars P.A., and Baross, J.A., Digestive Associations between Marine Detrivores and Bacteria,Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1990, vol. 21, pp. 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Probert, P.K., Disturbance, Sediment Stability, and Trophic Structure of Soft-Bottom Communities,J. Mar. Res., 1984, vol. 42, pp. 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shelford, V.E.,The Ecology of North America, Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shelgrove, P.V.R. and Butman, C., Animal-Sediment Relationships Revisited: Cause Versus Effect,Oceanogr. Mar. Biol., 1994, vol. 32, pp. 111–177.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sørensen, T.A., A New Method of Establishing Groups of Equal Amplitude in Plant Sociology Based on Similarity of Species Content and Its Application to Analysis of the Vegetation on Danish Commons,Biol. Skr. K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk., 1948, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Thorson, G., Bottom Communities (Sublittoral of Shallow Shelf),Treat. Mar. Ecol. Paleoecol., vol. 1, Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem., 1957, vol. 1, no. 67, pp. 461–534.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Underwood, A.J., The Detection of Non-Random Pattern of Distribution of Species along a Gradient,Oecologia, 1978, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Van der Meer, J., Exploring Macrobenthos-Environment Relationship by Canonical Correlation Analysis,J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 1991, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 105–120.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ward, J.H., Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function,J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1963, vol. 58, no. 301, pp. 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Ozolin'sh
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Marine Biology, Far East DivisionRussian Academy of SciencesVladivostokRussia

Personalised recommendations