Advertisement

Journal of Economics and Finance

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 413–421 | Cite as

Quantile-regression estimates of cigarette demand elasticities for the United States

  • Rajeev K. Goel
  • Rati Ram
Article

Abstract

Using a simple model and state-level cross-section U.S. data from 1993 to 1999, quantile-regression estimates of price elasticity and income elasticity for cigarette demand are obtained. It is noted that price elasticity shows a sizable variation across the high and low quantity-quartiles. There is a similar variability in the income elasticity, but most of these estimates lack statistical significance. Besides providing an indication of the variation in the price (and income) elasticity for different consumption levels, the exercise suggests some interpretative caution in regard to estimates from constant-elasticity models.

Keywords

Quantile Regression Price Elasticity Income Elasticity Bottom Quartile Extreme Quantile 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arias, Omar., K.F. Hallock, and W. Sosa-Escudero. 2001. “Individual Heterogeneity in the Returns to Schooling: Instrumental Variables Quantile Regression Using Twins Data.”Empirical Economics 26: 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltagi, Badi H., and D. Levin. 1986. “Estimating Dynamic Demand for Cigarettes Using Panel Data: The Effects of Bootlegging, Taxation and Advertising Reconsidered.”Review of Economics and Statistics 68: 148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltagi, Badi H., J.M. Griffin, and W. Xiong. 2000. “To Pool or Not to Pool: Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Estimators Applied to Cigarette Demand.”Review of Economics and Statistics 82: 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2000.Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar
  5. Chaloupka, Frank J., and K.E. Warner. 2000. “The Economics of Smoking.” InHandbook of Health Economics, Vol. 1, edited by A. Culyer and J. Newhouse: pp. 1539–1627. New York, NY: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamberlain, Gary. 1994. “Quantile Regression, Censoring, and the Structure of Wages.” InAdvances in Econometrics, Sixth World Congress Vol. 1, edited by C.A. Sims: pp. 171–209. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Deaton, Angus. 1997.The Analysis of Household Surveys. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeCicca, Phillip, D. Kenkel, and A. Mathios. 2002. “Putting Out the Fires: Will Higher Taxes Reduce the Onset of Youth Smoking?”Journal of Political Economy 110: 144–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallet, Craig A., and J.A. List. 2003. “Cigarette Demand: A Meta-Analysis of Elasticities.”Health Economics 12: 821–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leu, Robert E. 1984. “Anti-Smoking Publicity, Taxation, and the Demand for Cigarettes.”Journal of Health Economics 3: 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maier, Frank H. 1955. “Consumer Demand for Cigarettes Estimated from State Data.”Journal of Farm Economics 37: 690–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tobacco Institute. 1999.The Tax Burden on Tobacco: Historical Compilation. Vol. 34. Arlington, VA: Orzechowski and Walker.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Economics and Finance 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajeev K. Goel
    • 1
  • Rati Ram
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsIllinois State UniversityNormal

Personalised recommendations