, Volume 24, Issue 1–2, pp 97–119 | Cite as

Modelling and parameter estimation for fly-by-wire aircraft/control systems

Advances In Mathematical Modelling And Simulation


This paper covers in detail the issues related to parameter estimation of open loop dynamics of fly-by-wire aircraft/control systems from closed loop data. System identifiability aspects in the closed loop and the effect of various feedback types on the parameterisation of the system matrices are reviewed. The methods commonly employed for the detection of collinearity in the data are discussed. A brief discussion of the common methods used for analysis of unstable/augmented aircraft are given. Also, controller information based identification method (CIBIM), which utilises knowledge of the controller in the analysis, is presented. The discussion is followed by numerical results of application of the techniques to simulated data.


Fly-by-wire aircraft control systems open loop dynamics parameter estimation filtering regression 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Belsley D A, Kuh E, Welsh R E 1980Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity (New York: John Wiley & Sons)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bierman G J 1977Factorisation methods for discrete sequential estimation. (London: Academic Press)Google Scholar
  3. Girija G, Jategaonkar R V 1991 Some results of ATTAS flight data analysis using maximum likelihood parameter estimation method. DLR-FB-9104, IFM, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  4. Girija G, Raol J R 1993 PC based flight path reconstruction using UD factorisation filtering algorithm.Defence Sci. J. 43: 429–447Google Scholar
  5. Girija G, Raol J R 1995a Controller information based identification methods. InProc. 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, USA AIAA paper no. 96-0900Google Scholar
  6. Girija G, Raol J R 1995b Estimation of parameters of unstable and augmented aircraft system using recursive mixed estimation technique.J. Inst. Eng. (Aerosp. Div.) 76: 15–22Google Scholar
  7. Jategaonkar R V, Plaetchke E 1983 Maximum likelihood parameter estimation from flight test data. DFVLR-FB 83-14, IFM, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  8. Jategaonkar R V, Plaetschke E 1989 Algorithms for aircraft parameter estimation accounting for process and measurement noise.J. Aircraft 26: 360–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein V 1989 Estimation of aircraft aerodynamic parameters from flight data.Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 26: 1–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koehler R, Wilhelm K 1979 Closed loop aspects of aircraft identification. AGARD LS-104, pp 10–1 to 10–25Google Scholar
  11. Maine R E, Iliff K W 1986 Application of parameter estimation to aircraft stability and control — the output error approach. NASA RP 1168Google Scholar
  12. Maine R E, Murray J E 1988 Application of parameter estimation to highly unstable aircraft.J. Guidance, Control Dynamics 11: 213–219Google Scholar
  13. Mereau P, Abu El Ata-Doss S 1985 Parameter estimation of aircraft with fly-by-wire control systems.IFAC Proceedings on identification and system parameter estimation (Pergamon)Google Scholar
  14. Plaetschke E, Weiss S, Rohlf D 1993 Identification at high angles of attack applied to X-31A flight test data. InProc. NAL DLR Symposium on System Identification, DLR-Mitt. 93-14, DLR, GermanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© the Indian Academy of Sciences 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.System Identification Laboratory, Flight Mechanics and Control DivisionNational Aerospace LaboratoriesBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations