Bulletin of Materials Science

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 141–146 | Cite as

Lanthanum oxide doping effect on dc electrical conductivity of ferroelectrics sodium vanadate and rubidium vanadate

  • D V Pawar
  • T S Magdum
  • S H Chavan


The temperature dependence of dc electrical conductivity was measured by two-probe technique in the vicinity of phase transition point for ferroelectrics sodium vanadate and rubidium vanadate doped with different concentrations of La2O3. These materials show a sharp change in conductivity at their phase transition temperatures. The results were found to obey the conventional exponential law and the activation energies were calculated for ferroelectric and paraelectric states. It was found that activation energy in ferroelectric phase is smaller than in the paraelectric phase. The activation energy increases slowly with increase in doping concentration of La2O3 up to 0·1 mol%, however, it decreases with further increase in doping concentration, in both ferro and para states. The dc electrical conductivity below the Curie temperature is of mixed type (ionic-electronic) while it is electronic type above the Curie temperature.


Ferroelectrics conductivity phase transition activation energy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chavan S H and Kulkarni A J 1993J. Phys. Status Solidi a35 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Feigelson R, Martin G and Johnson B J 1972Crystal Growth (Germany) 13/14 686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gaur K and Lal H B 1985J. Mater. Sci. (Poland) 20 3167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gaur K and Lal H B 1986J. Mater. Sci. (USA) 21 2289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gopala Krishnan R and Seshamma S 1991Bull. Mater. Sci. 14 1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grawford A E 1959Br. Commun. Electronics 6 516Google Scholar
  7. Guruvich V M and Rez I S 1960Sov. Phys. Solid State 2 624Google Scholar
  8. Hawthorne F and Calvo C 1977J. Solid State Chem. 22 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Patil V V, Kashid A P and Chavan S H 1989Bull. Mater. Sci. 12 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Patil N B, Patil R T and Chavan S H 1990Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 28 276Google Scholar
  11. Rasal S P, Magdum T S, Pawar D V and Chavan S H 1993Ferroelectrics 139 57Google Scholar
  12. Sawyer C B and Tower C H 1930Phys. Rev. 35 269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sakai T, Adachi G, Shiokawa J and Shinike T 1976Mater. Res. Bull. 11 1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tawfik A, Sekina M M A and El-Nimr M K 1978Indian J. Phys. A52 164Google Scholar
  15. Verma B and Lal H 1981Mater. Res. Bull. 16 1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Weston T B, Webster A H and McNamara N H 1969J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 52 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • D V Pawar
    • 1
  • T S Magdum
    • 1
  • S H Chavan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsShivaji UniversityKolhapurIndia

Personalised recommendations