Remaining life assessment of high temperature components using threshold stress concept
- 65 Downloads
The paper first presents global experience, including that of our laboratory, mainly with power plant components to show that it is possible to extend the life of some critical components 2–3 fold over the design life. Different approaches for remaining life assessment are also briefly discussed.
It appears that the main creep damage in so far as Cr-Mo and Cr-Mo-V steels are concerned, is an accumulation of creep strain. Hence, this paper suggests a new approach for creep life prediction based on threshold stress concept and stress-strain rate relationship. The approach is based on the analysis of creep and hot tensile data generated on a popular 1 Cr-0·3 Mo-0·25 V steel in the service exposed and the virgin states and also on samples with a wide range of microstructures prepared from the virgin states. A summary of the main finding leading to development of a new approach has been given.
KeywordsCreep resistant steels creep strain damage threshold stress remaining life
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Auerkan 1983 Remanent creep life estimation of old power plant steam piping systemsInt. Conf. on Adv. in Life Prediction Methods (eds) D A Woodford, J R Whitehead (New York: ASME) pp. 353–356Google Scholar
- Blum W, Reppich B 1985 Creep behaviour of crystalline solids.Progress in creep and fracture (eds) B Wilshire, R W Evans (Swansea: Univ. College) vol. 3Google Scholar
- Cane B J, Townsend R D 1983 Production of remaining life in low-alloy steelsFlow and fracture at elevated temperatures (ed) R Raj (Metals Park, OH: ASME) pp. 279–316Google Scholar
- Cheruvu N S 1989 Degradation of mechanical properties of Cr-Mo-V and 2·25 Cr-1 Mo steel components after long-term service at elevated temperatures.Metall. Trans. A20: 87–97Google Scholar
- Dooley B (ed.) 1987Conf. Proceeding: Life extension and assessment of fossil power plants (Palo Alto, CA: EPRI)Google Scholar
- Foldina V, Jakobove A, Prinka T, Sabotk J, 1973 Influence of microstructure on creep properties of low-alloy ferritic Cr-Mo-V steels.Proc. Conf. on creep strength in steels and alloys, (London: The Met. Soc.) pp. 230–236Google Scholar
- Nakashiro M, Kihara S, Kishimoto F, Fujimori T 1990 Evaluation of long-term creep strength of 2·25 Cr-1 Mo heat transfer tube in actual service stress level range.Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. Int. 30: 823–828Google Scholar
- Neubauer B, Wadel U 1983 Rest life estimation of creeping components by means of replicas.Int. Conf. Adv. in Life Prediction Methods (eds) D A Woodford, J R Whitehead (New York: ASME) pp. 307–313Google Scholar
- Russel R, Jeneson R R, Tien J K 1985 Temperature and strain dependence of stress-strain behaviour in a Ni-base superalloys.Metall. Trans. A16: 1049–1068Google Scholar
- Senior B A 1988 A critical review of precipitation behaviour in 1 Cr-Mo-V rotor steels.Mater. Sci. Eng. A103: 263–271Google Scholar
- Singh R 1993 Assessment of fracture and failure.Familarisation programme on power plant metallurgy. NTPC, Vindhyachal Super Power Project organised by NML, Jamshedpur (ed) R Singh, pp. R1–R12Google Scholar
- Viswanathan R 1989 Damage mechanism and life assessment of high temperature components. (Metals Park, OH: ASME)Google Scholar
- Weber H 1983 Report No. 35-V, Mannesman, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- Weber H, Wellnitz G 1993 Assessment of creep affected materials to determine remaining service life.Proc. Int. Workshop on Power Plant Remaining Life Evaluation, Prediction, Extension and Optionization (Calcutta: ASME — Indian Chapter)Google Scholar
- Wolf H 1990Kriechender Legierungen NiCr22Co12Mo und 10CrMo910 BEI Konstanter und zyklischer Beanspruching. PhD thesis, Univ. of Erlangen, Nurnberg, Germany.Google Scholar
- Woodford D A, Whitehead J R (eds) 1983Int. Conf. Adv. in Life Prediction Methods (New York: ASME)Google Scholar
- Wufee V 1983 A study of life prediction techniques for main steam pipes made of pearlitic steels in power plants in China.Int. Conf. Adv. in Life Prediction Methods (eds) D A Woodford, J R Whitehead (New York: ASME) pp. 347–351Google Scholar