Advertisement

Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985)

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 149–154 | Cite as

Causal superluminal interpretation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

  • N. Cufaro Petroni
  • J. P. Vigier
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    J. P. Vigier:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,24, 258, 265 (1979); N. Cufabo Petroni and J. P. Vigie:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,25, 151 (1979).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    L de Broglie:La physique quantique restera-t-elle indeterministet (Paris, 1953).Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    D. Bohm:Phys. Rev.,85, 166, 180 (1952).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    D. Bohm and B. Hiley: inQuantum Mechanics a Half Century Later, edited by J. Leite-Lopes and M Paty (1975).Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    O. M. P. Bilaniuk, V. K. Deshpande and E. C. G. Sudarshan:Am. J. Phys.,30, 718 (1962); G. Feinberg:Phys. Rev.,159, 1089 (1967); E. Recami and R. Mignani:Riv. Nuovo Cimento,4, 209, 398 (1974); E. Recami:Found. Phys.,8, 329 (1978).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    P. M. A. Dirac:Nature (London),168, 906 (1951).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    F. Guerra and P. Ruggiero:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,23, 529 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    N. Cufaro Petroni and J. P. Vigier:A Markov process at the velocity of light: the Klein-Gordon statistic, preprint Inst. H. Poincaré, Paris (June 1979).Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    J. Andrade e Silva:La théorie des systémes de particles dans l’interprétation causale de la méca- nique ondulatoire (Paris, 1960).Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    A. Garuccio and F. Selleri:Action at distance in quantum mechanics, inCommunication at Kinstein’s Centenary Commemoration (Paris, June 1979); N. Cufaro Petroxi, A. Garxjccio, F. Sel- leri and J. P. Vigier:Sur la contradiction d Einstein-Bell entre les théories de la mésure quantique et la théorie locale de la rélativité restreinte, preprint Inst. H. Poincaré (June 1979).Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    It. P. Feynman:Phys. Rev,76, 749, 769 (1949).MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    R. Hakim:Lett. Nuovo Cimento,25, 108 (1979).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    D. Bohm and J. P. Vigier:Phys. Rev.,109, 1882 (1958); D. Gutkowski, M. Moles and J. P. Vigier:Nuovo Cimento B,39, 193 (1977); F. Halbwachs:Théorie retativiste des fluides γ spin (Paris, 1960).MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    O. Costa de Beauregard:Phys. Lett. A,67, 171 (1978);Ann. Fond, de Broglie,2, 231 (1977)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Cufaro Petroni
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. P. Vigier
    • 3
  1. 1.Istituto di Fisica dell’ UniversitàBariItalia
  2. 2.Sezione di BariIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareItalia
  3. 3.Institut Henri PoincaréParisFrance

Personalised recommendations