Advertisement

Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985)

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 113–116 | Cite as

Experimental evidence of the einstein paradox

  • O. Costa de Beauregard
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    S. J. Freedman andJ. F. Clauser:Phys. Rev. Lett.,28, 938 (1972);J. F. Clauser:Phys. Rev. Lett.,36, 1223 (1976);E. Fry andR. C. Thomson:Phys. Rev. Lett.,37, 465 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    A. Einstein, inRapports et Discussions du V Conseil Solvay (Paris, 1928), p. 253.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky andN. Rosen:Phys. Rev.,47, 777 (1935).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    A. Einstein: inEinstein Philosopher Scientist, edited byP. A. Schilp (Evanston, Ill., 1949), p. 85, 683.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    E. Schrödinger:Naturwiss.,23, 807, 823, 844 (1935). See, p. 845.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    L. de Broglie:Une tentative d’interprétation causale et non linéaire de la mécanique ondulatoire (Paris, 1956), p. 73.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    M. Renninger:Physik,158, 417 (1970);Phys. Zeits.,136, 251 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (9).
    O. Costa de Beauregard:Phys. Lett. (in press). See also,Compt. Rend. Google Scholar
  9. (10).
    O. Costa de Beauregard:Rev. Intern. Philos.,61–62, 1 (1962);Dialectica,19, 1 (1962);19, 280 (1965); inProceedings of the International Conference on Thermodynamics, edited byP. T. Landsberg (London, 1970), p. 540;Found. Phys.,6, 539 (1976).Google Scholar
  10. (11).
    H. P. Stapp:Nuovo Cimento,29 B, 270 (1975);J. S.Bell:Epist. Lett.,9, 11 (1976);W. C. Davidon: preprint.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (12).
    A. Garuccio andF. Selleri: preprint.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Costa de Beauregard
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Physique ThéoriqueInstitut Henry PoincaréParis

Personalised recommendations