Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985)

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 180–182 | Cite as

Evidence against diffractive factorization

  • M. Teper


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    R. M. Edelstein, R. A. Carrigan jr.,N. C. Hien, T. J. McMahon, I. Nadelhaft, E. W. Anderson, E. J. Bleser, G. B. Collins, T. Fujii, J. Menes andF. Turkot:Phys. Rev. D,5, 1073 (1972);J. V. Allaby, A. N. Diddens, R. W. Dobinson, A. Klovning, J. Litt, L. S. Rochester, K. Schlüpmann, A. M. Wetherell, U. Amaldi, R. Biancastelli, C. Bosio andG. Matthiae:Nucl. Phys.,52 B, 316 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Although this fact has not (to the author’s knowledge) been publicized before, it has apparently been noted by some diffractive phenomenologists:J. Kasman: private communication.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Reasonable variations ins 0, or the use of mass factors as appear in cos\(\theta \iota \), do not alter our conclusions significantly.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    For slopes for pp→p+M.M. at ISR see Fig. 3b) inM. G. Albrow, D. P. Barber, A. Bogaerts, B. Bošnjaković, J. R. Brooks, A. B. Clegg, F. C. Erné, C. N. P. Gee, A. D. Kanaris, D. H. Locke, F. K. Loebinger, P. G. Murphy, A. Rudge, J. C. Sens, K. Terwilliger andF. van der Veen:Nucl. Phys.,51 B, 388 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Societä Italiana di Fisica 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Teper
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsWestfield CollegeLondon

Personalised recommendations