Abstract
Purpose
Our purpose was to survey recipients in an ovum donation program and report on their expectations while waiting for their potential donor recipient match.
Methods
Accepted or rejected anonymous ovum donor matches (n = 80) from January 1996 to May 1997 were evaluated. Patients generated a “wish list” of desired traits and physical characteristics. From an approved donor pool of medically and psychologically screened women, candidates were drawn upon as potential matches and presented to the potential recipient, who decided whether to accept the donor. Reasons for accepting or rejecting the donor were tallied and were compared to the patient’s wish list.
Results
Medical history and race were ranked by 33 and 23% of recipient couples as the two most important characteristics, while 74 and 54% stated that these were among the three most important factors in a potential donor compared with other traits. Fiftyseven (71%) recipients accepted, while 23 (29%) rejected, the first donor presented to them. Eleven were subsequently given a second choice within 6 months, with 10 (91%) accepting the next presented match. Recipients waiting for a donor were just as likely to accept or reject a potential candidate whether waiting < 3 months (33%; 15/46), 3–6 months (25%; 4/16), or >6 months (22%; 4/18) (P > 0.05; NS). In all but five recipients, the reason for rejection was consistent with their top three priorities reported in their wish list.
Conclusions
Phenotypic, ethnic, educational, and other interests are important in the selection of an ovum donor. Recipients are proactive in their decision process, making educated and well considered decisions in spite of the limited pool and the extended time frame in waiting for an appropriate ovum donor.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wright J, Alert M, Lacers A: Psychosocial distress and infertility: A review of controlled research. Int J Fertil 1989:34:126–142
Sable MM: To everything there is a season. Contemp Ob/ Gyn 1992:37:153
Facchinetti F, Matteo ML, Artini GP, Volpe A, Genazzani AR: An increased vulnerability to stress is associated with a poor outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer treatment. Fertil Steril 1997;67(2):309–314
Lindheim SR, Legro RS, Morris RS, Vijod MA, Lobo RA, Paulson RJ, Sauer MV: Altered stress responses to stress in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization and recipients of oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1995:10:320–323
Berger DM: Impotence following the discovery of azospermia. Fertil Steril 1980:34:154–156
Berger DM: Couples’ reactions to male infertility and donor insemination. Am J Psychiatry 1980:137:1047–1049
Sauer MV, Ary BR, Paulson RJ: The demographic characterization of women participating in oocyte donation: A review of 300 consecutively performed cycles. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1994:45:147–151
Brill M, Levin S: Psychological screening and counseling for ovum donation.In Gamete Donation, MM Sable, S Crockin (eds). Boston, Jones and Bartlett, 1995
Sable MM, Kiessling A: More on compensating egg donors. N Engl J Med 1993:329:278–279
Purdie A, Peek JC, Irwin R, Ellis J, Graham FM, Fisher PR: Identifiable semen donors—Attitudes of donors and recipient couples. NZ Med J 1992:5:27–28
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindheim, S.R., Sauer, M.V. Expectations of recipient couples awaiting an anonymous oocyte donor match. J Assist Reprod Genet 15, 444–446 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744939
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744939