Bulletin of Materials Science

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 295–312 | Cite as

Processing of low grade tungsten ore concentrates by hydrometallurgical route with particular reference to India

  • Premchand
Special Section on “Utilization of Tungsten Resources In India: Present Status And Future Prospects”


Tungsten, because of its high strength and high melting point occupies a prime position amongst metals. With depletion of high grade resources considerable R and D work is still being carried out in tungsten producing countries around the world for the processing of low grade and secondary resources. The paper gives a brief review of the hydrometallurgical processes developed to recover tungsten from low grade concentrates.

The R and D work carried out on purification and recovery of tungsten as tungstic oxide/ammonium paratungstate (APT) from a number of off-grade products such as table concentrate (WO3=66%, SiO2=2·2%, S=1·8%), middlings (18–20% WO3, and 28–30% S) and jig concentrate (4·6% WO3) are discussed in this paper. It has been found that more than 75% of silica and 90% of sulphur could be removed from the table concentrate by curing with hydrofluoric acid and subsequent roasting of the desilicated product at 650°C. In the case of middlings, it was possible to recover over 90% of tungsten as tungstic oxide by an oxidative roast followed by pressure leaching with soda.

A detailed study on the low grade jig concentrate to recover tungsten as APT, showed that over 90% extraction was possible by adopting the pressure leaching-solvent extraction route. Effect of parameters such as soda concentration, time, temperature and pressure during leaching; as well as extraction and stripping behaviour of tungsten from leach solution at different pH and aqueous to organic ratio during solvent extraction with Alamine-336, were studied and a flow-sheet was developed for processing of jig concentrate analysing 4·6% WO3.


Low grade concentrate pressure leaching purification of concentrate and leach solution solvent extraction APT crystallization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bhat T R and Gokhale Y W 1966 BARC Report No. A.E.E.T/251Google Scholar
  2. Bhosale S N, Mookherjee S and Pardeshi R M 1990High Temp. Mater. & Processes 9 147Google Scholar
  3. Churchward P E and Bridges D W 1966 US Bureau of Mines, Report of Investigation, p. 6845Google Scholar
  4. Coca J, Diez F V and Moris M A 1990Hydrometallurgy 25 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Drobnik J L and Lewis C J 1962 US Patent 3, 052, 516Google Scholar
  6. Gokhale Y W and Gupta S S 1968 Report No. BARC, p. 380Google Scholar
  7. Guedes De Carvalho R A and Sampaio M N M 1991Hydrometallurgy 26 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamilton E M 1918 US Patent 1, 261, 383Google Scholar
  9. Honggui Li, Maosheng Liu and Yunjiao Li 1987 W-Ti-Re-Sb 88,Proc. of the 1st international conference on metallurgy and material science, 2, p. 192Google Scholar
  10. Hughes M A and Hanson C 1983Proc. symp. hydrometallurgy — research, development and plant practice (eds) Osseo-Asare and Miller (TMS/AIME), pp 491–501Google Scholar
  11. John E Litz 1981Extractive metallurgy of refractory metals, Proc. symp. (eds) H Y Sohn, Norman Carlson and J Thomas Smith (TMS/AIME), pp 69–81Google Scholar
  12. Ke J J, Yue L D and Liu W D 1986Hydrometallurgy 16 325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Konishi Y, Katada H and Asai S 1986Metall. Trans. B18 331Google Scholar
  14. Lassner E 1982Proc. of second international tungsten symposium, San Francisco, p. 71Google Scholar
  15. Li K C 1962J. Metals 14 413Google Scholar
  16. Li K C and Wang Chung Yu 1956Tungsten (New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation), 3rd ed. p. 166Google Scholar
  17. MacInnis M B and Kim T K 1983Handbook of solvent extraction (eds) T C Lo, M H I Baird and C Hanson (New York: John Wiley), p. 689Google Scholar
  18. Marshall R E 1983Proc. Aust. Inst. Min. Metall. 325Google Scholar
  19. Maslenitsky N N and Perlov P M 1960 Ch. inInternational mineral processing congress 1959 (London: Institution of Mining and Metallurgy), p. 839Google Scholar
  20. Qixiu Z, Bofan G, Welzhuang H and Shaoying H 1988 Research Institute of Non-ferrous Metallurgy, Central-South University of Technology, Changsha, PRC, p. 97Google Scholar
  21. Queneau P and Cooke S R B 1969TMS-AIME Trans. 254 2541Google Scholar
  22. Queneau P B, Huggins D K and Beckstead L W 1981Extractive metallurgy of refractory metals, Proc. of symp. of the metallurgical society of AIME, p. 237Google Scholar
  23. Shamsuddin M and Sohn H Y 1981Extractive metallurgy of refractory metals, Proc. symp. TMS/AIME (eds) Sohn, Carlson and Smith, p. 205Google Scholar
  24. Subramanian C, Suri A K and Gupta C K 1992Trans. The Indian Institute of Metals 45 207Google Scholar
  25. Yih S W H and Wang C T 1979Tungsten (New York: Plenum Press) 1st ed., p. 89Google Scholar
  26. Zhou Ju-Qin and Xue Jian 1990Proc. of fifth international tungsten symposium, Budapest, p. 79Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Academy of Sciences 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Premchand
    • 1
  1. 1.Non-ferrous Process DivisionNational Metallurgical LaboratoryJamshedpurIndia

Personalised recommendations