, Volume 18, Issue 3–4, pp 477–529 | Cite as

New studies in vortex dynamics: Incompressible and compressible vortex reconnection, core dynamics, and coupling between large and small scales

  • Fazle Hussain
  • Davinder Virk
  • Mogens V Melander
Surveys In Fluid Mechanics — III


Coherent structure dynamics in turbulent flows are explored by direct numerical simulations of the Navier-Stokes equations for idealized vortex configurations. For this purpose, two dynamically significant coherent structure interactions are examined: (i) incompressible and compressible vortex reconnection and (ii) core dynamics (with and without superimposed small-scale turbulence). Reconnection is studied for two antiparallel vortex tubes at a Reynolds number (Re) of 103. Incompressible reconnection consists of three distinct phases: inviscid advection, bridging and threading. The key mechanism, bridging, involves the ‘cutting’ of vortex lines by viscous cross diffusion and their subsequent reconnection in front of the advancing vortex dipole. We conjecture that reconnection occurs in successive bursts and is a physical mechanism of cascade to smaller scales.

Compressible reconnection is seen to be significantly affected by the choice of pressure and density initial conditions. We propose a polytropic initial condition which is consistent with experimental results and low-Mach number asymptotic theories. We also explain how compressibility initiates an early reconnection due to shocklet formation, but slows down the circulation transfer at late times. Thus, the reconnection timescale increases with increasing Mach number.

Motivated by the important role of helical vortex lines in the reconnected vortices (bridges), we focus our attention on the dynamics of an axisymmetric vortex column with axial variation of core size. The resulting core dynamics is first explained via coupling between swirl and meridional flows. We then show that core dynamics can be better understood by applying a powerful analytical tool —helical wave decomposition — which extracts vorticity wave packets, thereby providing a simple explanation of the dynamics. The increase in core size variation with increasing Re in such a vortex demonstrates the limitation of the prevalent vortex filament models which assume constant core size. By studying the columnar vortex with superimposed small-scale, homogeneous, isotropic turbulence, we address the mutual interactions between large and small scales in turbulent flows. At its boundary the columnar vortex organizes the small scales, which, if Re is sufficiently high, induce bending waves on the vortex which further organize the small scales. Such backscatter from small scales cannot be modelled by an eddy viscosity. Based on the observation of such close coupling between large and small scales, we question the local isotropy assumption and conjecture a fractal vortex model for high Re turbulent flows.


Vortex dynamics vortex reconnection compressible vortex dynamics core dynamics helical wave decomposition coherent structures large-scale/small-scale interaction coherent structure/small-scale turbulence coupling 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ashurst W T, Meiburg E 1988 Three-dimensional shear layers via vortex dynamics.J. Fluid Mech. 189: 87–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batchelor G K 1967Introduction to fluid dynamics (Cambridge: University Press)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bridges J, Husain H, Hussain F 1989 Whither coherent structures? InWhither turbulence? Turbulence at the crossroads (ed.) J Lumley (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)Google Scholar
  4. Brown G L, Roshko A 1974 On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers.J. Fluid Mech. 64: 775–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crow S C 1970 Stability theory of a pair of trailing vortices.AIAA J. 8: 2172–2179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crow S C, Champagne F H 1971 Orderly structure in jet turbulence.J. Fluid Mech. 48: 547–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dosanjh D, Weeks T 1965 Interaction of a starting vortex as well as a vortex street with a travelling shock wave.AIAA J. 3: 216–223MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Erlebacher G, Hussaini M, Kreiss H, Sarkar S 1990 The analysis and simulation of compressible turbulence.icase Rep. No. 90–15Google Scholar
  9. Feiereisen W, Reynolds W, Ferziger J 1981 Numerical simulation of a compressible homogeneous, turbulent shear flow. Report, StandfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Greene J M 1990 Vortex nulls and magnetic nulls. InTopological fluid mechanics (eds) H K Moffatt, A Tsinober (Cambridge: University Press)Google Scholar
  11. Hussain F 1981 Role of coherent structures in turbulent shear flows.Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Eng. Sci.) 4: 129–175Google Scholar
  12. Hussain F 1983 Coherent structure—reality and myth.Phys. Fluids 26: 2816–2850MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hussain F 1984 Coherent structures and incoherent turbulence. InTurbulence and chaotic phenomena in fluids (ed.) T Tatsumi (Amsterdam: North-Holland)Google Scholar
  14. Hussain F 1986 Coherent structures and turbulence.J. Fluid Mech. 173: 303–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hussain F, Husain H 1989 Elliptic jets. Part I. Characteristics of unexcited and excited jets.J. Fluid Mech. 208: 257–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kerr R N, Hussain F 1989 Simulation of vortex reconnection.Physica D37: 474–484Google Scholar
  17. Kida S, Takaoka M 1990 Breakdown of frozen motion of vorticity field and vortex reconnection.J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60: 2184–2196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kline S J, Reynolds W D, Schraub F A, Runstadler P W 1967 The structure of turbulent boundary layers.J. Fluid Mech. 30: 741–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee S, Lele S, Moin P 1991 Eddy shocklets in decaying compressible turbulence.Phys. Fluids A3: 657–664Google Scholar
  20. Leonard A 1985 Computing three-dimensional incompressible flows with vortex elements.Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 17: 523–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lesieur M 1990Turbulence in fluids 2nd edn (London: Kluwer)MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Lundgren T S 1982 Strained spiral vortex model for turbulent fine structure.Phys. Fluids 25: 2193–2203MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lundgren T S, Ashurst W T 1989 Area-varying waves on curved vortex tubes with application to vortex breakdown.J. Fluid Mech. 200: 283–307MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Mandella M 1987Experimental and analytical studies of compressible vortices, Ph D thesis, Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  25. McWilliams J C 1984 The emergence of isolated vortices in turbulent flow.J. Fluid Mech. 146: 21–43MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meiron D I, Shelley M J, Ashurst W T, Orszag S A 1989 Numerical studies of vortex reconnection. InMathematical aspects of vortex dynamics (ed.) R Caflish (SIAM)Google Scholar
  27. Melander M V, Hussain F 1988 Cut-and-connect of two antiparallel vortex tubes. Report-S88, 257–286, Stanford University: also, 1989Phys. Fluids A1: 633–636Google Scholar
  28. Melander M V, Hussain F 1990 Topological aspects of vortex reconnection. InTopological fluid mechanics (eds) H K Moffatt, A Tsinober (Cambridge: University Press)Google Scholar
  29. Melander M V, Hussain F 1993a Topological vortex dynamics in axisymmetriv viscous flows.J. Fluid Mech. (in press)Google Scholar
  30. Melander M V, Hussain F 1993b Polarized vorticity dynamics on a vortex column.Phys. Fluids A5: 1992–2003MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. Melander M V, Hussain F, Basu A 1991 Breakdown of a circular jet into turbulence.Turbulent Shear Flows 8, Munich, pp. 15.5.1–15.5.6Google Scholar
  32. Melander M V, McWilliams J C, Zabusky N J 1987 Axisymmetrization and vorticity gradient intensification of an isolated two-dimensional vortex through filamentation.J. Fluid Mech. 178: 137–159MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Melander M V, Zabusky N J, McWilliams J C 1988 Symmetric vortex merger in two dimensions: causes and conditions.J. Fluid Mech. 195: 303–340MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. Moffatt H K 1969 The degree of knottedness of tangled vortex lines.J. Fluid Mech. 35: 117–129MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moffatt H K, Tsinober A (eds) 1990Topological fluid mechanics (Cambridge: University Press)MATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Moses H E 1971 Eigenfunctions of the curl operator, rotationarlly invariant Helmholtz theorem, and applications to electromagnetic theory and fluid mechanics.SIAM J. Appl. Math. 21: 114–144CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. Narasimha R 1989 The utility and drawbacks of traditional approaches. InWhither turbulence? Turbulence at the crossroads (ed.) J Lumley (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)Google Scholar
  38. Newcomb W A 1958 Motion of magnetic lines of force.Ann. Phys. 3: 347–385MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. Passot T, Pouquet A 1987 Numerical simulation of compressible homogeneous flows in turbulent regime.J. Fluid Mech. 181: 441–466MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwarz K 1985 Three-dimensional vortex dynamics in superfluid4He: Line-line and line-boundary interactions.Phys. Rev. B31: 5782–5803Google Scholar
  41. Shariff K, Leonard A, Zabusky N, Ferziger J 1988 Acoustics and dynamics of coaxial interacting vortex rings.Fluid Dyn. Res. 3: 337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Siggia E D 1985 Collapse and amplification of a vortex filament.Phys. Fluids 28: 794–805MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stanaway S, Shariff K, Hussain F 1988 Head-on collision of viscous vortex rings.NASA reportctr S-88, 287Google Scholar
  44. Takaki R, Hussain F 1985 Recombination of vortex filaments and its role in aerodynamic noise.Turbulent Shear Flows V, Cornell University, 3.19–3.25Google Scholar
  45. Truesdell C 1954The kinematics of vorticity, Indiana University Publications Science Series, No. 19Google Scholar
  46. Van Dyke M 1988An album of fluid motion (Stanford,CA: Parabolic Press)Google Scholar
  47. Zank G, Matthaeus W 1991 The equations of nearly incompressible fluids. I. Hydrodynamics, turbulence, and waves.Phys. Fluids A3: 69–82MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fazle Hussain
    • 1
  • Davinder Virk
    • 1
  • Mogens V Melander
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations