Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 129–144 | Cite as

Management of the belgian coast: Opinions and solutions

  • Ruyck An M. C. De 
  • Ampe Carole 
  • Langohr Roger 


Since the beginning of the 20th century the Belgian coast has undergone important changes of which an overview is presented here. To determine the view of the Belgian public on the Belgian coast and in order to obtain their opinions and solutions to the problems along the Belgian coast, a questionnaire survey was conducted with a total of 100 respondents divided into five groups, all active in the coastal zone. The five groups included (1) politicians on various levels of authority, (2) coastal entrepreneurs and business people, (3) naturalists and scientists, (4) coastal residents and (5) tourists. Coastal zone problems, as perceived by the different groups, and their solutions are discussed. Former municipalities, in particular, were held responsible for the current coastal problems. Most respondents were skeptic about the application of recent juridical instruments (e.g. the Dune Decree), the structural plans and their power to protect the remaining natural areas. The root of the problems seems to lie in lack of coordination and communication between different authorities responsible for the coastal zone.


Coastal stakeholder participation Coordination Overdevelopment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anon. 1991.Zeewerende duinen—niet alleen zeewering. A report by the Coastal Harbours Service of the Department of the Environment and Infrastructure, Vlaams Gewest, Brussels.Google Scholar
  2. Anon. 1992a.Structuurplan, Kustzone. Deel I: Analyse van de bestaande toestand en evolutie. WES, Brugge.Google Scholar
  3. Anon. 1992b.Structuurplan, Kustzone. Deel II: Knelpunten, prognoses en behoeftebepaling. WES, Brugge.Google Scholar
  4. Anon. 1992c.Structuurplan, Kustzone. Samenvattend Rapport. WES, Brugge.Google Scholar
  5. Anon. 1992d.Annual report 26. Westtoerisme, Brugge.Google Scholar
  6. Anon. (Administratie Waterinfrastructuur en Zeewezen). 1993a.Kust 2002, Deel 1. De Zeewerende funktie van de kust. Stand van zaken. Preliminary report of the Flemish Community, Dept. of Environment and Infrastructure, Brussels.Google Scholar
  7. Anon. 1993b.Statistica for Windows. Release 4.2. Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK.Google Scholar
  8. Anon. 1993c.Coastal zone management: Integrated Policies. OECD Publication Services, Paris.Google Scholar
  9. Anon. (Natuurreservaten vzw & WWF) 1994, 1999.Tien punten-programma voor integraal kustzonebeheer in België. Paper presented at the symposium ‘Kustdag— Tussen Land en Zee’ at De Haan, June 1994.Google Scholar
  10. Anon. 1995.Toerisme Vlaanderen: visie op toerisme in Vlaanderen 1995–2000. Toerisme Vlaanderen, Brussels.Google Scholar
  11. Anon. (European Commission) 1997.Better management of coastal resources. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  12. Anon. 1999.Lessons from the European Commission’s demonstration programme on integrated coastal zone management. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  13. Baeteman, C. 1995. De conflictsituatie tussen natuur en toerisme in het kustgebied.De Aardrijkskunde 3: 5–20.Google Scholar
  14. Ballinger, R.C., Havard, M., Pettit, S. & Smith, H.D. 1996. Towards a more integrated management approach for the Welsh coastal zone. In: Jones, P.S., Healy, M.G. & Williams, A.T. (eds.),Studies in European coastal management, pp. 35–44. Samara Publishing, Cardigan.Google Scholar
  15. Boldyrev, V.L., Ryabkova, O.I. & Shelkov, I.A. 1996. The role of SNPO Baltberegozashita in coastal protection along the Baltic sea coast of the Kalingrad Region. In: Jones, P.S., Healy, M.G. & Williams, A.T. (eds.)Studies in European coastal management, pp. 101–103. Samara Publishing, Cardigan.Google Scholar
  16. Bossu, P. 1991. Het ruimtelijk wanbeleid aan de Vlaamse Kust.Panda (WWF) 41: 20–21.Google Scholar
  17. Burbridge, P. & Humphrey, S. 1999. On the integration of science and management in coastal management research.J. Coastal Conserv. 5: 103–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carter, R.W.G. 1988.Coastal environments: an introduction to the physical, ecological and cultural systems of coast-lines. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  19. Chan, G.L. 1970.Analysis of the effects of public and educational school field trips on a marine environment Duxbury Reef. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  20. DePue, E., Lavrysen, L. & Stryckers, P. 2000.Milieuzakboekje 2000—Leidraad voor de milieuwetgeving in Vlaanderen. Kluwer, Antwerpen.Google Scholar
  21. de Ruig, J.H.M. 1998. Coastline management in The Netherlands: human versus natural dynamics.J. Coastal Conserv. 4: 127–134.Google Scholar
  22. De Ruyck, A.M.C., Soares, A.G. & McLachlan, A. 1995. Factors influencing human’s beach choice on three South African sandy beaches: a multivariate analysis.Geojournal 36: 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Ruyck, A.M.C., Soares, A.G. & McLachlan, A. 1997. Human recreation patterns on beaches with different levels of development.Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 52: 257–276.Google Scholar
  24. Dronkers, J. & de Vries, I. 1999. Integrated coastal management: the challenge of transdisciplinarity.J. Coastal Conserv. 5: 97–102.Google Scholar
  25. Fabbri, P. 1990.Recreational uses of coastal areas. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  26. Goeldner, L. 1999. The German Wadden sea coast: reclamation and environmental protection.J. Coastal Conserv. 5: 23–30.Google Scholar
  27. Granja, H.M. 1996. Some examples of inappropriate coastal zone management in Northwest Portugal. In: Jones, P.S., Healy, M.G. & Williams, A.T. (eds),Studies in European coastal management, pp. 121–128. Samara Publishing, Cardigan.Google Scholar
  28. Gubbay, S. 1994. Recommendations for a European Union coastal strategy.Coastline 1994 (3): 16–29.Google Scholar
  29. Hawkins, R. 1996. Green Globe: a new approach to environmentally responsible tourism. In: Jones, P.S., Healy, M.G. & Williams, A.T. (eds)Studies in European coastal management, pp. 75–80. Samara Publishing, Cardigan.Google Scholar
  30. Herrier, J.-L. 1994.Het Duinendecreet en de ruimtelijke ordening aan de kust. Paper delivered at the symposium ‘Kustdag—Tussen land en zee’ at De Haan, June 1994.Google Scholar
  31. Herrier, J.-L. 1998. Anecosystem-perspective for the Flemish coast.Coastline 1998 (3): 27–29.Google Scholar
  32. Herrier, J.-L. & Killemaes, I. 1998. Acquisition and protection of the coastal dunes of Flanders.Coastline 1998 (4): 10–15.Google Scholar
  33. Herrier, J.-L. & Thomas, K. 1995. The Belgian coast: first steps towards an integrated coastal zone management. In: Healy, M.G. & Doody, J.P. (eds.)Directions in European coastal management, pp. 375–382. Samara Publishing, Cardigan.Google Scholar
  34. Houghton, D.S. 1989. Some aspects of beach use in the Perth metropolitan area.Austr. Geograph. 20(2): 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, S. 1996. A comparative analysis of coastal zone management plans in England and the Netherlands. In: Jones, P.S., Healy, M.G. & Williams, A.T. (eds)Studies in European coastal management, pp. 45–56. Samara Publishing, Cardigan.Google Scholar
  36. Kay, R. & Alder, J. 1995. Recent initiatives in coastal planning and management in Australia. In: Healy, M.G. & Doody, J.P. (eds)Directions in European coastal management, pp. 415–424. Samara Publishing, Cardigan.Google Scholar
  37. Kelchtermans, T. 1990.Gemeenschapsminister van Leefinilieu, Natuurbehoud en Landinrichting. Milieubeleidsplan en Natuurontwikkelingsplan voor Vlaanderen voor 1990–1995. Ministry of the Flemish Community, Brussels.Google Scholar
  38. Maes, F. & Cliquet, A. 1996.Het Belgisch beleid inzake de bescherming van de Noordzee. Department of International Public Law, University of Ghent, Ghent.Google Scholar
  39. Maes, F. & Cliquet, A. 1997.Het internationaal en nationaal recht inzake de bescherming van de Noordzee, pp. 83–157. Kluwer Rechtswetenschappen, Antwerpen.Google Scholar
  40. Meur-Ferec, C. 1995. The role of territorial departments in the conservation of French coastal sites. In: Healy, M.G. & Doody, J.P. (eds.)Directions in European coastal management, pp. 383–390. Samara Publishing, Cardigan.Google Scholar
  41. Miller, M.L. & Auyong, J. 1991. Coastal zone tourism—a potent force affecting environment and society.Marine Policy March 1991: 75–99.Google Scholar
  42. Moffett, M. & De Ruyck, A. 1995.Beaches as recreational outlets—a national questionnaire survey. SAB Institute for Coastal Research Report 37, University of Port Elizabeth, Port Elizabeth.Google Scholar
  43. Morgan, C.I., King, G.A.D. & Evans, S.B. 1996. Environmental management in Milford Haven: anintegrated approach. In: Jones, P.S., Healy, M.G. & Williams, A.T. (eds)Studies in European coastal management, pp. 281–292. Samara Publishing, Cardigan.Google Scholar
  44. Provoost, S. & Hoffmann, M. 1996.Ecosysteemvisie voor de Vlaamse Kust. II Natuurontwikkeling. Report by AMINAL: section Nature, Brussels. University of Ghent and Institute voor Natuurbehoud, Brussels.Google Scholar
  45. Seys, J., Meire, P., Devos, K. & Kuijken, E. 1993.De Kust-en Vlaamse Banken: ecologisch belang, raakvlakken met andere functies en beheersuggesties. Conceptrapport. Institute for Nature Conservation, Hasselt.Google Scholar
  46. Sidaway, R. 1995. Recreation and tourism on the coast: managing impacts and resolving conflicts. In: Healy, M.G. & Doody, J.P. (eds)Directions in European coastal management, pp. 71–78. Samara Publishing, Cardigan.Google Scholar
  47. Siegel, S. & Castellan, N.J. 1988.Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, Singapore.Google Scholar
  48. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995.Biometry. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  49. Zar, J.H. 1984.Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EUCC; Opulus Press Uppsala 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruyck An M. C. De 
    • 1
  • Ampe Carole 
    • 2
  • Langohr Roger 
    • 2
  1. 1.HeverleeBelgium
  2. 2.Laboratory of Soil ScienceGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations