Summary
Numerous forest surveys are conducted annually on a worldwide basis. These surveys have multiple purposes which may include estimates of forest growth and productivity, community structure, biodiversity appraisals and/or forest condition (health) appraisals as examples. Many of these surveys are then utilized by others in developing reports of a more generalized nature. Hence, data collected without attention to detail may become lost in averages and the data itself can more easily become susceptible to accidental or directed misinterpretations and manipulations. Such may very well be the case in surveys previously conducted to determine forest condition (health) and subsequent misinterpretations about generalized symptoms being ascribed to air pollutants as their sole etiological agents. Terms such as forest decline and ‘Waldsterben’ and ‘neuartige Waldschäden’ have become erroneously associated with air pollutants (acid rain) as the primary etiological agent.
Zusammenfassung
Zahlreiche Waldbestandsaufnahmen werden jährlich weltweit durchgeführt. Sie dienen vielseitigen Zwecken, so z. B. Waldzuwachs- und-ertragsschätzungen, Feststellung von Struktur und Artenreichtum der Lebensgemeinschaft Wald, und/oder Wald- (Gesundheits-)zustandserhebung. Viele dieser Bestandsaufnahmen werden dann von Dritten bei der Erstellung mehr allgemeiner Berichte praktisch ausgewertet. Damit können Daten, die ohne Beachtung von Einzelheiten erhoben wurden, in Durchschnittswerten verloren gehen und die einzelnen Daten selbst leicht Gegenstand zufälliger oder gezielter Fehlauslegung und Zweckentfremdung werden. Das kann durchaus der Fall sein bei früheren Wald- (gesundheits-)zustandserhebungen und nachfolgenden Fehleinschätzungen verallgemeinerter Symptome, die ausschließlich der Luftverschmutzung zugeschrieben wurden. Ausdrücke wie Rückgang der Gesundheit des Waldes, “Waldsterben” und “neuartige Waldschäden” wurden fälschlich mit Luftverschmutzung (saurer Regen) als Hauptursache in Verbindung gebracht.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anon., 1992: Earth Almanac: Even in spring, leaves fall—some forever. Nat'l Geog.,181, 4, 140.
Anthony, T., 1992: Mona Lisa of forests dying? Johnstown Tribune-Democrat. Oct.11, p. E3.
Barnard, J. E; Lucier, A. A.; Johnson, A. H.; Brooks, R. T.; Karnosky, D. F.; Dunn, P. H. 1989: Changes in forest health and productivity in the United States of America. NAPAP SOS/T 16. Wash., D.C.
Bruck, R. I.;Robarge, W. P.;McDaniel, A., 1989: Forest decline in the boreal montane ecosystems of the southern Appalachian mountains. J. Water, Air, Soil Pollut.48, 161–180.
Chamberlin, T. C., 1897; Studies for students: The method of multiple working hypothesis. J. of Geology V, 837–848.
Dull, C. W.; Ward, J. D.; Brown, H. D.; Ryan, G. W.; Clerke, W. H.; Uhler, R. J., 1988: Evaluation of spruce and fir mortality in the southern Appalachian Mountains. USDA-For. Serv. Prat. Rept. R-8-PR-13. Atlanta, GA.
Egerter, D. E., 1989: Ghost moths and dead spruce. Amer. For. July–Aug. 54–57.
Grehan, J. R.;Parker, B. L.;Wagner, D. L.;Rosvsky, J.;Aleong, J., 1992: Root damage by the conifer swift moth: A mortality factor in montane red spruce regeneration. For. Sci.38, 611–622.
Hall, J. P., 1990: ARNEWS Annual Report 1990. For. Can. Int. Report ST-X-1.
Innes, J. L.;Boswell, R. C., 1987: Monitoring of forest condition in Great Britain. Forestry Commission Bull. 98. Farnham Surrey, ENG.
Jacobson, J. S.;Heller, L. I.;Yamada, K. E.;Osmeloski, J. F.;Bethard, T., 1989: Foliar injury and growth response of red spruce to sulfate and nitrate acid mist. Can. J. For. Res.20, 58–65.
Joslin, J. D.;Wolfe, M. H., 1988: Responses of red spruce seedlings to changes in soil aluminum in six amended forest soil horizons. Can. J. For. Res.18, 1614–1672.
Kandler, O., 1992: Historical declines and diebacks of central European forests and present conditions. J. Env. Tox. and Chem.11, 1077–1093.
Leonard, G. L.;Tobi, D. R.;Parker, B. L., 1991: Spatial and temporal distribution ofKorscheltellus gracilis larvae (Lepidoptera:Hepialidae) in the Green Mountains, Vermont. Env. Entom.20, 371–376.
Lucaschewski, von I.;Mettendorf, B., 1988: Waldschadensituation 1988 in Baden-Württemberg, Nr. 20, 506–510.
Lynch, J. A., 1990. Spatial and temporal variability in atmospheric deposition overview: A Pennsylvania prospectus. Proc., Atmospheric Deposition in Pennsylvania: A Critical Assessment. Environmental Resources Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. September 11–14, 1989, 50–62.
Magasi, L. P., 1988: Acid Rain National Warning System: manual on plot establishment and monitoring. Can. For. Serv. Int. Rep. DPC-X-25. Ottowa.
Miller-Weeks, M; Millers, I.; Cooke, R., 1988: Description of crown symptoms on red spruce (Picea rubens, Sarg.) and balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) in the NE U.S. Proc. Symp. Effects of Atmos. Pollut. on Spruce and Fir. For. in the Eastern U.S. and the FRG. USDA-For. Serv. Gen. Techn. Rep. NE-120.
Millers, I.; Allen, D. C.; La Chance, D., 1992: Sugar maple crown conditions improve between 1988 and 1990. U.S. Dept. Agric. For. Serv. NA-TP-03-92.
Millers, I.; La Chance, D.; Burkman, W. G.; Allen, D. C., 1990: North American sugar maple decline project: organization and field methods. U.S. Dept. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Techn. Rep. NE-154.
Ministry of Ag., CR., 1991: Forestry of the Czech Republic. Branch of Forestry, Prague.
Nash, B. L.;Davis, D. D.;Skelly, J. M., 1992: Forest health along a wet sulfate/pH deposition gradient in northcentral Pennsylvania. J. Env. Tox. and Chem.11, 1095–1104.
Quebec Ministry Agriculture, 1986. Maple Decline. Conseil des Productions Vegetales du Quebec, AGDEX 300/637. Quebec City, CAN.
Rykowski, K., (Undated) Will the forest survive? Ministry of Env. Prot. Natural Resources and Forestry, Lomianki, ul. Baczynskiego, Pol.
Rykowski, K., 1991. The state of forests in Poland, 1991. Ministry of Env. Protection, For. Res. Inst., Lomianki, ul. Baczynskiego, Pol.
Saxena, V. K.;Stogner, R. D.;Hendler, A. H.;DeFelice, T. P.;Yeh, R. J.-Y.;Lin, N. H., 1988: Monitoring the chemical climate of Mt. Mitchell State Park for evaluation of its impact on forest decline. Tellus 41B, 92–109.
Schopfer, W.;Hradetzky, J., 1984: Circumstantial evidence: Air pollution is the determinative factor causing forest decline. Forstw. Cbl.103, 231–247.
Schutt, P.;Cowling, E. B. 1985: Waldsterben, a general decline of forests in central Europe: Symptoms, development and possible causes. Plant Disease69, 548–558.
Siccama, T. G.;Bliss, M.;Vogelmann, H. W., 1982: Decline of red spruce in the Green Mountains of Vermont. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club109, 162–168.
Simini, M. J.;Skelly, J. M.;Davis, D. D., 1989: Ozone concentrations monitored in remote and forested areas of northcentral Pennsylvania. Phytopathology79, 1220.
Skelly, J. M., 1989: Forest decline versus tree decline—the pathological considerations. Env. Mon. and Assess.12, 23–27.
—, 1991: A closer look at forest decline in Europe: A need for more accurate diagnostics. pp. 223–241 in:Majumdar, S. K., et al., ed. Air Pollution: Environmental Issues and Health Effects. PA. Acad. Sci., Easton, PA.
Skelly, J. M., 1992: A closer look at forest decline: A need for more accurate diagnostics in:Manion, P. D.; LaChance, D., Forest Decline Concepts. Amer. Phytopathological Society Press (In press).
—, 1992: Global perspective on forest health issues: An attempt to discern fact from fiction. J. Env. Tox. and Chem.11, 1049–1050.
Tobi, D. R.;Leonard, J. G.;Parker, B. L.;Wallner, W. E., 1992: Survey methods, distribution, and seasonality ofKorscheltellus gracilis (Lepidoptera:Hepialidae) in: the Green Mountains, Vermont. Env. Entom.21, 447–452.
Wagner, D. L.;Parker, B. L.;Wallner, W., 1987: Red spruce decline in New England: Are swift moths the culprits? Vermont Sci.11, 1 and 4.
Wagner, D. L.;Tobi, D. R.;Parker, B. L.;Wallner, W. E.;Leonard, J. G., 1989: Immature stages and natural enemies ofKorscheltellus gracilis (Lepidoptera:Hepialidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer.82, 717–724.
Wagner, D. L.;Tobi, D. R.;Wallner, W. E.;Parker, B. L., 1991:Korscheltellus gracilis (Grote): A pest of red spruce and balsam fir roots (Lepidoptera:Hepialidae). Can. Ent.123, 255–263.
Wallner, W. E.; Wagner, R. L.; Parker, B. L., Tobi, D. R., 1991: Bioecology of the conifer swift moth,Korscheltellus gracilis, a root feeder associated with spruce-fir decline, pp. 199–204 inBaranchikov, Y. N., et al., eds. Forst Insect Guilds Patterns of interactions with host trees. U.S. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Techn. Rep. NE-153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skelly, J.M. Diagnostics and air pollution damage appraisals: Are we being sufficiently careful in appraising our forest health?. Forstw Cbl 112, 12–20 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02742124
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02742124