Skip to main content
Log in

The third step: Freud, the feminists, and postmodernism

  • Published:
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Benjamin, J. (1988).The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1992). Discussion of Jordan’s “The relational self: A new perspective for understanding women’s development.”Contemporary Psychotherapy Review 7:82–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boris, H. N. (1986). Bion revisited.Contemporary Psychoanalysis 22:159–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasseguet-Smirgel, J. (1976). Freud and female sexuality.International Journal of Psycho-analysis 57:275–286.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. J. (1978).The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. J. (1994).Femininities, Masculinities, Sexualities. Lexington, KY: The University of Kentucky Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. J. (1995). Gender as a personal and social construction.Signs 20:516–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimen, M. (1991). Deconstructing difference: Gender, splitting, and transitional space.Psychoanalytic Dialogues 1:335–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimen, M. (1994). Money, love, and hate: Contradiction and paradox in psychoanalysis.Psychoanalytic Dialogues 4:69–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fast, I. (1984).Gender Identity: A Differentiation Model. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, J. (1990).Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fliegel, Z. (1986). Women’s development in analytic theory: Six decades of controversy. In J. L. Alpert, ed.,Psychoanalysis and Women: Contemporary Reappraisals. Hillsdale, N.J.: The Analytic Press, pp. 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality.Standard Edition 7:125–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1924). The dissolution of the Oedipus complex.Standard Edition 19:173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1925). Some psychical consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes.Standard Edition 19:241–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1931). Female sexuality.Standard Edition 21:221–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1933). On femininity.Standard Edition 22:112–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982).In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldner, V. (1991). Toward a critical relational theory of gender.Psychoanalytic Dialogues 1:249–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M., ed. (1964).Interpersonal Psychoanalysis: The Selected Papers of Clara Thompson. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. 1967 (1923).Feminine Psychology, Harold Kelman (ed.). New York: Norton, pp. 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. V., Kaplan, A. G., Miller, J. B., Stiver, I. P., and Surrey, J. L. (1991).Women’s Growth in Connection: Writings from the Stone Center. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. N. (1990). The invention of heterosexuality.Socialist Review 20(1):7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. (1986). Concerning a psychoanalytic view of maleness.Psychoanalytic Review 73:179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1976).Toward a New Psychology of Women. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1991). The construction of anger in women and men. In J. V. Jordan et al.,Women’s Growth in Connection: Writings from the Stone Center. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J., and Rose, J., eds. (1982).Feminine Sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the École Freudienne, J. Rose, trans. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, K. (1994).Reasonable Creatures. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, M. (1989). Linking the psychological and the social: Feminism, poststructuralism, and multiple personality.Dissociation 2(1):24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (1988). Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or, the uses of post-structuralist theory for feminism.Feminist Studies 14:33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Sue A. (1988). Personal communication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dimen, M. The third step: Freud, the feminists, and postmodernism. Am J Psychoanal 55, 303–319 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02741980

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02741980

Navigation