The American Journal of Psychoanalysis

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 323–338 | Cite as

The psychology of the shrew and shrew taming: An object relations perspective

  • Roger C. Sealy


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bradbrook, M. C. (1982). Dramatic role as social image: A study ofThe Taming of the Shrew. In M. C. Bradbrook,The Artist and Society in Shakespeare’s England: The Collected Papers of Muriel Bradbrook, vol. 1 (pp. 106–120). Towata, NJ: B & N Imports.Google Scholar
  2. Coleman, M. L. (1952). Externalization of the toxic introject: A treatment technique for borderline cases.Psychoanalytic Review 43: 235–242.Google Scholar
  3. Dougan, J. D. (1987). Reinforcement in the sixteenth century: Was the Bard a behaviorist?Behavior Analyst 10:189–196.Google Scholar
  4. Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952).An Object-Relations Theory of the Personality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Greer, G. (1971).The Female Eunuch (pp. 205–207). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Hamilton, N. G. (1988).Self and Others: Object Relations Theory in Practice. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.Google Scholar
  7. Hibbard, G. R. (1964).The Taming of the Shrew: A social comedy. In A. Thaler and N. Sanders (eds.),Shakespearean Essays (pp. 15–28). Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  8. Holland, N. N. (1966).Psychoanalysis and Shakespeare. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  9. Kernberg, O. F. (1975).Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  10. Kernberg, O. F. (1976).Object Relations Theory and Clinical Psycho-analysis. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  11. Kernberg, O. F. (1977). Structural change and its impediments. In P. Hartocollis (ed.),Borderline Personality Disorders: The Concept, the Syndrome, the Patient (pp. 275–306). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lindauer, M. S. (1969). Quantitative analyses of psychoanalytic studies of Shakespeare.Journal of Psychology 72: 3–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lindauer, M. S. (1974).The Psychological Study of Literature: Limitations, Possibilities and Accomplishments. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Masterson, J. F. (1985).The Real Self: A Developmental, Self, and Object Relations Approach. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  15. Masterson, J. F., and D. B. Rinsley (1975). The borderline syndrome: The role of the mother in the genesis and psychic structure of the borderline personality.International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 56: 163–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Morris, B. (ed.) (1981).The Taming of the Shrew (pp. 1–149). The Arden Shakespeare. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
  17. Nelson, M. C. (1962). Effect of paradigmatic techniques on the psychic economy of borderline patients.Psychiatry 25: 119–134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nevo, R. (1980). “Kate of Kate Hall.” In R. Nevo,Comic Transformations in Shakespeare (pp. 37–52). New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
  19. Novy, M. L. (1984). Patriarchy and play inThe Taming of the Shrew. In M. L. Novy,Love’s Argument: Gender Relations in Shakespeare (pp. 45–62). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ravich, R. A. (1964). A psychoanalytic study of Shakespeare’s early plays.Psychoanalytic Quarterly 33: 388–410.Google Scholar
  21. Saccio, P. (1985). Shrewd and kindly farce.Shakespeare Survey 37: 33–40.Google Scholar
  22. Searles, H. F. (1959). Integration and differentiation in schizophrenia.British Journal of Medical Psychology 32: 261–281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Segal, H. (1964).Introduction to the Work of Melanie Klein. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Spotnitz, H. (1987).Psychotherapy of Preoedipal Conditions (pp. 137–151). New York: Aronson.Google Scholar
  25. Thompson, A. (ed.) (1984).The Taming of the Shrew (pp. 25–41). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Willbern, D. (1978). William Shakespeare: A bibliography of psychoanalytic and psychological criticism, 1964–1975.International Review of Psycho-Analysis 5: 361–372.Google Scholar
  27. Willbern, D. (1980). A bibliography of psychoanalytic and psychological writings on Shakespeare: 1964–1978. In M. M. Schwartz and C. Kahn (eds.),Representing Shakespeare: New Psychoanalytic Essays (pp. 264–288). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger C. Sealy
    • 1
  1. 1.Havertown

Personalised recommendations