Skip to main content
Log in

Correlative study on MRI morphologic features, pathology, and molecular biology of breast cancer

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the correlation among MRI morphologic features, pathology, and molecular biology of breast cancer.

Methords

MRI was used to analyze the morphologic features of breast cancers of 78 patients before operation. The mastectomy specimens of the breast neoplasms were immunohistochemically stained, and the expression of the estrogen (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), C—erbB—2, P53, and the distribution of microvessel density (MVD) measured. The pathologic results were compared with the MRI features.

Results

Among the 80 breast cancers, ER positive expression was positively correlated with the spicular contour of breast cancers (P<0.01 ), while showing a significant inverse correlation with the T—stage (P<0.05). C—erbB —2 and P53 positive expression were positively correlated with the necrotic center of the cancers (P<0.05). The expression of. PR was not significantly correlated with the spicular contour, obscure margin, necrotic center, and T—stage of these cancers (P>0.05). Among 41 breast cancers examined with dynamic contrast enhanced MR, there was a positive correlation between the spatial distribution of the contrast agent and MVD (P<0.01).

Conclusion

To a certain extent there is some correlation among the MRI morphologic features, pathology, and molecular biological factors in breast cancer. The biological behavior and prognosis of breast cancer can be assessed based on MRI features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pan P, Liu AL, Song QW, et al. Correlation of MR imaging characterizations and histologic microvessel density in hepatocellular carcinoma. Chin J Radiol. 2002; 36:420–424.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peng XB, Lin YQ, Luo YH, et al. The correlation between CT appearance and the structure and abnormal expression of P53 gene in peripheral lung cancer. Chin J Med Imaging. 2000; 8:210–212.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu JK, Zeng. JZH, Zhou JH. Study on the correlation between CT appearance and DNA conients in peripheral lung adenocarcinomas and squamous —cell carcinomas. Chin J Radiol. 1996; 30:15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sobin LH, Hemanek P, Hutter RV. TNM classification of malignant tumors. A comparison between the new (1987) and the old editions. Cancer. 1988; 61:2310–2314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fizgibbons PL, Page DL, Weaver D, et al. Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000; 124:966–978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paradiso A, Mangia A, Barletta A, et al. Mammography and morphobiologic characteristics of human breast cancer. Tumori. 1993; 79:422–426.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lamb PM, Perry NM, Vinnicombe SJ, et al. Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Clin Radio. 2000; 55:40–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tan PH, Ho JT, Ng EH, et al. Pathologic —radiologie correlations in screen—detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: findings of the Singapore breast screening project. Int J Cancer. 2000; 90:231–236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sardanelli F, Rescinito G, Giordano CD, et al. MR dynamic enhancement of breast lesions: high temporal resolution during the first —minute versus eight —minute study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000; 24:724–731.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Esseman L, Hylton N, George T, et al. Contrast—enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to assess tumor histopathology and angiogenesis in breast carcirioma. Breast J. 1999; 5:13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu PF, Bao RX, Niu Y, et al. Angiogenesis and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of benign and malignant breast lesions: preliminary results. Chin J Radiol. 2002; 36:967–972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayma S, et al. Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologie features and tumor angiogenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997; 21:421–430.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayma S, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histologie findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology. 1996;200:639–649.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Dijke CF, Brasch RC, Roberts TP, et al. Mammary carcinoma model: correlation of macromolecular contrast-enhanced MR imaging characterizations of tumor microvasculature and histologie capillary density. Radiology, 1996; 198:813–818.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Edakuni G, et al. Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast — enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologie features and expression of growth factors. Radiology. 2000; 217:841–848.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiig H, Tveit E, Hultborn R, et al. Interstitial fluid pressure in DMBA —induced rat mammary tumors. Scand J Clin Invest, 1982; 42:159–164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, R., Gong, S., Zhang, W. et al. Correlative study on MRI morphologic features, pathology, and molecular biology of breast cancer. Chin. J. Clin. Oncol. 2, 521–528 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02739744

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02739744

Keywords

Navigation