Advertisement

Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985)

, Volume 41, Issue 17, pp 571–576 | Cite as

The nonlocal folding model and its relations with the Perey-Buck potential

  • S. Ali
  • G. Schiffrer
Article
  • 24 Downloads

Summary

A separable projectile-nucleon interaction is used in the single-folding model to generate a nonlocal projectile-nucleus potential. The latter is found to be of the Perey-Buck type, provided onlys-waves are considered for the projectile-nucleon interaction. The Perey-Buck potential is also used as an input in the nonlocal folding model, in which case the angular-momentum algebra is greatly simplified. Gaussian form factors are used both for potentials and densities.

PACS

24.10 Nuclear reactions and scattering models and methods 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    P. E. Hodgson:Lecture Notes in Physics,55 (Berlin, Heidelberg and New York, N. Y. 1976), and also H. V. von Geramb (ed.):Microscopic optical potential, inProceedings of Hamburg Conference, 1978 (Berlin, 1979).Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Z. Majka, A. Budzanowski, K. Grotowski andA. Strzałkowski:Phys. Rev. C,18, 114 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    M. B. Golin andS. Kubono:Phys. Rev. C,20, 1347 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    F. J. Viñas, M. Lozano andG. Madurga:Phys. Rev. C,23, 780 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    A. M. Kobos, B. A. Brown, P. E. Hodgson, G. R. Satchler andA. Budzanowski:Nucl, Phys. A,384, 65 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    G. Cattapan, G. Pisent andV. Vanzani:Nucl. Phys. A,241, 204 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    A. A. Z. Ahmad, S. Ali, N. Ferdous andM. Ahmed:Nuovo Cimento A,30, 385 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    M. Rahman, D. Husain andS. Ali:Phys. Rev. C,10, 1 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    S. Ali:Proceedings of the Physics Symposium held at Dhaka (Bangladesh), January 17–20, 1979, published by Bangladesh Physical Society (Dhaka, 1981).Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    C. L. Lee andD. Robson:Nucl. Phys, A,379, 1 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Proceedings of the Physics Symposium held at Dhaka (Bangladesh), January 17–20, 1979, published by Bangladesh Physical Society (Dhaka, 1981).Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    F. Perey andB. Buok:Nucl. Phys.,32, 353 (1962).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    D. K. Srivastava andN. K. Ganguly:Proceedings of the Physics Symposium held at Dhaka (Bangladesh), January 17–20, 1979, published by Bangladesh Physical Society (Dhaka, 1981).Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    A. K. Kerman, H. McManus andR. M. Thaler:Ann. Phys. (N. T.),8, 551 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    V. R. Pandharipande:Nucl. Phys. A,166, 317 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    I. Sick:Nucl. Phys. A,208, 557 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    M. Abramowitz andI. A. Stegun:Handbook of Mathematical Functions (New York, N. Y., 1968).Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    M. Moshinsky:Nucl. Phys.,13, 104 (1959).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    U. Fano andG. Racah:Irreducible Tensorial Sets (New York, N. Y., 1959).Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    W. Gröbner andN. Hofreiter:Integraltafel II (Wien, 1966).Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    G. Schiffrer:Proceedings of the Physics Symposium held at Dhaka (Bangladesh), January 17–20 1979, published by Bangladesh Physical Society (Dhaka, 1981).Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    M. M. Giannini andG. Ricco:Lecture Notes in Physics,55 (Berlin, Heidelberg and New York, N. Y., 1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Ali
    • 1
  • G. Schiffrer
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Fisica dell’ UniversitàFerraraItalia

Personalised recommendations