Advertisement

Improving marketing channel control through power and exchange

  • Mary Ann Lederhaus
Article

Abstract

Effective channel management control is necessary to marketing planning. The flow of power and exchange in distribution systems has received extensive attention in the literature in recent years, however, internal structuring patterns precipitating these interactions have received cursory attention. This paper presents an initial conceptualization of a social systems model which illustrates why power phenomena exist and how these phenomena flow through role interactions among members of a channel of distribution. Implications for managerial action are presented in which managers utilize sources of power which have the greatest possibility of achieving control.

Keywords

Market Research Channel Control Distribution Channel American Market Association Channel Member 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alderson, Wroe. 1967.Dynamic Marketing Behavior Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Alderson, Wroe. 1958.Marketing Behavior and Executive Action, Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Alderson, Wroe. 1954. “Factors Governing the Development of Marketing Channels,” inMarketing Channels for Manufactured Products by Richard M. Clewett (ed.), Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin as reprinted in Bruce E. Mallen 1967.The Marketing Channels: A Conceptual Viewpoint, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Artle, Roland and Sture Berglund. 1959. “A Note on Manufacturers’ Choice of Distribution Channel,”Management Science (July) 460–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates, Frederick L. and Clyde C. Harvey. 1975.The Structure of Social Systems, New York: Gardener Press Inc., A Division of John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Bates, Frederick L. and Lloyd Bacon. 1972. “The Community as a Social System,”Social Forces 50 (March) 271–79.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, James R. and Ralph L. Day. 1981. “Measures of Manifest Conflict in Distribution Channels,”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (August) 263–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, James R. and Gary L. Frazier. 1978. “The Application of Channel Power: Its Effects and Connotations,” inResearch Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, Educators’ Proceedings, American Marketing Association, 266–70.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, James R. and Sherman A. Timmins. 1981. “Substructural Dimensions of Interorganizational Relations in Marketing Channels,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 9 (Summer) 163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bucklin, Louis P. 1973. “A Theory of Channel Control,”Journal of Marketing 37 (January) 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bucklin, Louis P. 1965. “Postponement, Speculation, and the Structure of Distribution Channels,”Journal of Marketing Research 3 (February) 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. El Ansary, Adel I. and Robert A. Robicheaux. 1974. “A Theory of Channel Control: Revisited,”Journal of Marketing 38 (January) 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. El Ansary, Adel I. and Louis W. Stern. 1972. “Power Measurement in the Distribution Channel,”Journal of Marketing Research 9 (February) 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emerson, Richard M. 1962. “Power-Dependence Relations,”American Sociological Review 27 (February) 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Etgar, Michael. 1976. “Channel Domination and Countervailing Power in Distributive Channels,”Journal of Marketing Research 13 (August) 254–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. French, John R. P. and Bertram Raven. 1959. “The Bases of Social Power,” inStudies in Social Power by Dorwin Cartwright (ed.), Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 150–67.Google Scholar
  17. Galbraith, John K. 1967. “The Concept of Countervailing Power,” inThe Marketing Channel: A Conceptual Viewpoint by Bruce E. Mallen. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 119–23.Google Scholar
  18. Hawkins, E. R. 1967. “Vertical Price Relationships,” inThe Marketing Channel: A Conceptual Viewpoint by Bruce E. Mallen. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 140–47.Google Scholar
  19. Hunt, Shelby D. and John R. Nevin. 1974. “Power in a Channel of Distribution: Sources and Consequences,”Journal of Marketing Research 11 (May) 186–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levy, Michael and Dwight Grant. 1980. “Financial Terms of Sale and Control of Marketing Channel Conflict,”Journal of Marketing Research 17 (November) 524–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lusch, Robert F. 1976. “Channel Conflict, Its Impact on Retailer Operating Performances,”Journal of Retailing 52 (Summer) 3–12, 89–90.Google Scholar
  22. Lusch, Robert F. 1976. “Sources of Power: Their Impact on Intrachannel Conflict,”Journal of Marketing Research 13 (November) 382–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mack, Raymond W. and Richard C. Snyder. 1957. “The Analysis of Social Conflict-Toward an Overview and Synthesis,”Journal of Conflict Resolution 1 (June) 212–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mallen, Bruce E. 1967.The Marketing Channel: A Conceptual Viewpoint, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  25. McCammon, Bert C., Jr. and Robert W. Little. 1965. “Marketing Channels: Analytical Systems and Approaches,” in George Schwartz (ed.)Science in Marketing, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 321.Google Scholar
  26. Nix, Harold L., Paula L. Dressel, and Frederick L. Bates. 1977. “Changing Leaders and Leadership Structure: A Longitudinal Study,”Rural Sociology 42 (Spring) 22–41.Google Scholar
  27. Pearson, Michael M. 1981. “Ten Distribution Myths.”Business Horizons 24 (May/June) 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reve, Torger and Louis W. Stern. 1979. “Interorganizational Relations in Marketing Channels,”Academy of Management Review 4 (July) 405–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosenberg, Larry J. and Louis W. Stern. 1971. “Conflict and Measurement in the Distribution Channel,”Journal of Marketing Research 8 (November) 437–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenblatt, Jerry and Roger Calantone. 1981. “Using the Price/Quantity Model to Indicate Power in Marketing Channels,” inDevelopments in Marketing Science IV Proceedings, The Academy of Marketing Science, 14–19.Google Scholar
  31. Rosenbloom, Bert. 1973. “Conflict and Channel Efficiency: Some Conceptual Models for the Decision Maker,”Journal of Marketing 37 (July) 16–30.Google Scholar
  32. Schmidt, Stuart M. and Thomas A. Kochan. 1972. “Conflict: Toward Conceptual Clarity,”Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (September) 363–64.Google Scholar
  33. Shooshtari, Nader and Bruce Walker. 1980. “In Search of a Theory of Channel Behavior,”Theoretical Developments in Marketing, Proceedings, edited by Lamb and Dunne. Chicago, Illinois: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  34. Shuptrine, F. Kelly and J. Robert Foster. 1976. “Monitoring Channel Conflict with Evaluations from the Retail Level,”Journal of Retailing 52 (Spring) 55–74.Google Scholar
  35. Stern, Louis W. 1971. “The Interorganization Management of Distribution Channels: Prerequisites and Prescriptions,” inNew Essays in Marketing Theoryy by George Fiske (ed.), Boston, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 301–19.Google Scholar
  36. Stern, Louis W. and Jay W. Brown. 1969. “Distribution Channels: A Social Systems Approach,”Distribution Channels: Behavioral Dimensions by Louis W. Stern (ed.), Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton-Mifflin Book Company, 6–19.Google Scholar
  37. Stern, Louis W. and Adel I. El Ansary. 1977.Marketing Channels, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  38. Stern, Louis W. and Ronald H. Gorman. 1969. “Conflict in Distribution Channels: An Exploration,” inDistribution Channels: Behavioral Dimensions by Louis W. Stern (ed.), Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton-Mifflin Book Company, 156–175.Google Scholar
  39. Stern, Louis W. and Torger Reve. 1980. “Distribution Channels as Political Economics: A Framework for Comparative Analysis,”Journal of Marketing 44 (Summer) 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Teas, R. Kenneth and Stanley D. Sibley. 1980. “An Examination of the Moderating Effect of Channel Member Firm Size on Perception of Preferred Channel Linkages,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 8 (Summer) 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Ann Lederhaus
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North FloridaJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations