Advertisement

Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 171–188 | Cite as

Antiproton-proton elastic and inelastic total cross-sections between 57 and 178 MeV

  • U. Amaldi
  • B. Conforto
  • G. Fidecaro
  • H. Steiner
  • G. Baroni
  • R. Bizzarri
  • P. Guidoni
  • V. Rossi
  • G. Brautti
  • E. Castelli
  • M. Ceschia
  • L. Chersovani
  • M. Sessa
Article

Summary

About 25 000 interactions of antiprotons of kinetic energy between 57 and 178 MeV have been measured in a hydrogen bubble chamber. Elastic and inelastic total cross-sections have been determined at 15 values of the antiproton energy. The results are compared with theoretical predictions.

Keywords

Beam Momentum Imaginary Potential Beam Track Vacuum Tank Charged Meson 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Полные поперечные сечения упругого и неупругого антипротон-протнного рассеяния при энергиях от до 178 MεB.

Резюме

Были проведены измерения около 25000взаимодействий антипротонов с кинетической энергией от 57 до 178 MεB в водородной пузырьковой камере. Были определены полные попечные сечения упругого и неупругого рассеяния для 15 величин энергии антипротонов. Эти резулятаты сравнивают◹я с теоретическими предсказаниями.

Riassunto

Circa 25 000 interazioni di antiprotoni di energia cinetica tra 57 e 178 MeV sono state misurate in una camera a bolle a idrogeno. Si sono determinate le sezioni d'urto totali elastica ed inelastica per 15 valori dell'energia dell'antiprotone. I risultati sono confrontati con le previsioni teoriche.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    C. A. Coombes, B. Cork, W. Galbraith, G. R. Lambertson andW. A. Wenzel:Phys. Rev.,112, 1303 (1958).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    U. Amaldi, T. Fazzini, G. Fidecaro, C. Ghesquière, M. Legros andH. Steiner:Nuovo Cimento,34, 825 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    L. E. Agnew, T. Elioff, W. B. Fowler, R. L. Lander, W. M. Powell, E. Segrè, H. M. Steiner, H. S. White, C. Weigand andT. Ypsilantis:Phys. Rev.,118, 1371 (1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    B. Cork, O. I. Dahe, D. H. Miller, A. G. Tenner andC. L. Wang:Nuovo Cimento,25, 497 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    J. Loken andM. Derrick:Phys. Lett.,3, 334 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    G. Goldhaber, T. Kalogeropulos andR. Silberberg:Phys. Rev.,110, 1474 (1958);G. Baroni, G. Bellettini, C. Castagnoli, M. Ferro-Luzzi andA. Manfredini:Nuovo Cimento,12, 564 (1959);A. G. Ekspong andB. E. Ronne:Nuovo Cimento,13, 27 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    A. Hossain andM. A. Shaukat:Nuovo Cimento,38, 737 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    U. Amaldi jr.,B. Conforto, G. Fidecaro, H. Steiner, R. Tosi-Torelli, G. Baroni, R. Bizzarri, P. Guidoni, F. Marcelja, V. Rossi, A. Stajano, G. Brautti, E. Castelli, M. Ceschia, L. Chersovani andM. Sessa:Proceedings of the Sienna International Conference on Elementary Particles, vol1 (1963), p. 243.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    U. Amaldi, T. Fazzini, G. Fidecaro, C. Ghesquière, M. Legros andH. Steiner:Nuovo Cimento,30, 973 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    The separators have been kindly put at our disposal by the Separator Group of the Padua Section of INFN.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    At the time the experiment has been performed the PS maximum intensity was 2·1011 protons/burst.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    CERN, école Polytechnique and Oxford, Padua collaborations. We have used only a small fraction of the film obtained in this exposure.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    R. Armenteros: private communication.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    W. Rarita andP. Schwed:Phys. Rev.,112, 271 (1958).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    G. B. Chadwick, W. T. Davies, M. Derrick, J. H. Mulvey, D. Radojičić, C. A. Wilkinson, M. Cresti, S. Limentani, A. Loria andR. Santangelo:Proc. of the Aix-en-Provence Int. Conf. on Elementary Particles, vol.1 (1961), p. 269.ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    B. R. Desai:Phys. Rev.,119, 1390 (1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Z. Koba andG. Takeda:Progr. Theor. Phys.,19, 269 (1958).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    J. S. Ball andJ. F. Chew:Phys. Rev.,109, 1385 (1958).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    M. Ceschia andA. Perlmutter:Nuovo Cimento,33, 578 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    M. S. Spergel: University of Rochester report UR-875-24. After this work was submitted for publication, we have received a pre-print by Dr.M. Spergel (to be published onNuovo Cimento), where the calculations are extended to different values of the core radius.Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    P. E. Nemirowskii andYu. F. Strokov:Žurn. Ėksp. Teor. Fiz.,46, 1379 (1964); translated inSov. Phys. JETP,19, 932 (1964). See alsoJu. P. Elagin, P. E. Nemirovskii andJu. F. Strokov:Phys Lett. 7, 352 (1963).Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    R. A. Bryan andR. J. N. Phillips:Bull. Am. Phys. Soc.,10, 737 (1965) and private communications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Amaldi
    • 1
  • B. Conforto
    • 1
  • G. Fidecaro
    • 1
  • H. Steiner
    • 1
  • G. Baroni
    • 2
    • 3
  • R. Bizzarri
    • 2
    • 3
  • P. Guidoni
    • 2
    • 3
  • V. Rossi
    • 2
    • 3
  • G. Brautti
    • 4
    • 5
  • E. Castelli
    • 4
    • 5
  • M. Ceschia
    • 4
    • 5
  • L. Chersovani
    • 4
    • 5
  • M. Sessa
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.CERNGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Istituto di Fisica dell’UniversitàRomaItaly
  3. 3.Sezione di RomaIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareRomaItaly
  4. 4.Istituto di Fisica dell’UniversitàTriesteItaly
  5. 5.Sezione di TriesteIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations