Advertisement

Prospects

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 109–116 | Cite as

Institutional arrangements for evaluation

  • Ernest R. House
Open File: The Evaluation of Education Systems: The View at the end of the 1990s

Summary

Evaluations should be independent in terms of being able to arrive at impartial conclusions. They must be seen as being credible if they are to fulfil this function. Their impartiality is derived from using appropriate scientific methodology and by being protected from political interference. Within the government, evaluation offices should be lodged in independent agencies located close to decision makers, but not in the same office as the programme being evaluated. Scientific methods that protect against various forms of bias should be derived with assistance from the professional evaluation community.

Keywords

Government Agency Institutional Arrangement Private Firm Evaluation Expert Evaluation Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boston, J., et al. 1996.Public management: the New Zealand model, Oxford, U.K., Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Henkel, M. 1991.Government, evaluation and change. London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. House, E.R. 1997. Evaluation in the government marketplace.Evaluation practice (Greenwich, CT), vol. 18, no. 1, p. 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. — 1980.Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage Publications. [in Spanish:Evaluación, ética, poder. Madrid, Morata, 1994.]Google Scholar
  5. —; Haug, C.; Norris, N. 1996. Producing evaluations in large bureaucracies.Evaluation (London), vol. 2, no. 2, p. 135–150.Google Scholar
  6. Norris, N. 1995. Contracts, control, and evaluation.Journal of education policy (Basingstoke, UK), vol. 10, no. 3, p. 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Osborne, D.; Gaebler, T. 1992.Reinventing government. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  8. Wilson, J.Q. 1989.Bureaucracy. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© UNESCO 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ernest R. House

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations