Institutional arrangements for evaluation
- 31 Downloads
Evaluations should be independent in terms of being able to arrive at impartial conclusions. They must be seen as being credible if they are to fulfil this function. Their impartiality is derived from using appropriate scientific methodology and by being protected from political interference. Within the government, evaluation offices should be lodged in independent agencies located close to decision makers, but not in the same office as the programme being evaluated. Scientific methods that protect against various forms of bias should be derived with assistance from the professional evaluation community.
KeywordsGovernment Agency Institutional Arrangement Private Firm Evaluation Expert Evaluation Community
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Boston, J., et al. 1996.Public management: the New Zealand model, Oxford, U.K., Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Henkel, M. 1991.Government, evaluation and change. London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
- — 1980.Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage Publications. [in Spanish:Evaluación, ética, poder. Madrid, Morata, 1994.]Google Scholar
- —; Haug, C.; Norris, N. 1996. Producing evaluations in large bureaucracies.Evaluation (London), vol. 2, no. 2, p. 135–150.Google Scholar
- Osborne, D.; Gaebler, T. 1992.Reinventing government. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J.Q. 1989.Bureaucracy. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar