Advertisement

International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 479–495 | Cite as

Strategic responses of male samango monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) to a decline in the number of receptive females

  • S. P. Henzi
  • M. Lawes
Article

Abstract

Observations on a habituated troop of samango monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis)revealed that lone males did not achieve significant mating opportunities during a breeding season in which few females were sexually receptive. This stood in contrast to the previous year and was associated with the maintenance of shorter resident male-female distances, confirming suggestions that the reproductive benefits of residency are associated primarily with low numbers of simultaneously receptive females. At the same time, lone males made no attempt to challenge the resident male physically in order to gain access to females. Given the presence of a stable bachelor group and the absence of other, transient, males, these data are used to argue for male mating strategies that are sensitive to regional and temporal variability in the availability of receptive females.

Key words

Cercopithecus mitis samango guenon mating strategy males receptive females 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andelman, S. J. (1986). Ecological and social determinants of cercopithecine mating patterns. In Rubenstein, D. I., and Wrangham, R. W. (eds.),Ecological Aspects of Vertebrate Social Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., pp. 201–216.Google Scholar
  2. Butynski, T. M. (1982). Harem male replacement and infanticide in the blue monkey (Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmannt) in the Kibale Forest, Uganda.Am. J. Primatol. 3: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butynski, T. M. (1988). Comparative ecology of blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) in high and low density subpopulations (in press).Google Scholar
  4. Chism, J. B., and Rowell, T. E. (1986). Mating and residence patterns of male patas monkeys.Ethology 72: 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cords, M. (1984). Mating patterns and social structure in redtail monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius).Z. Tierpsychol. 64: 313–329.Google Scholar
  6. Cords, M. (1986). Forest guenons and patas monkeys: Male-male competition in one-male groups. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.),Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 98–111.Google Scholar
  7. Cords, M. (1988). Mating systems of forest guenons: A preliminary review. In Gautier-Hion, A., Bourliere, F., Gautier, J.-P., and Kingdon, J. (eds.),A Primate Radiation: Evolutionary Biology of the African Guenons, Cambrdige University Press, Cambridge pp. 323–339.Google Scholar
  8. Cords, M., and Rowell, T. E. (1986). Group fission in blue monkeys of the Kakamega Forest, Kenya.Folia Primatol. 46: 70–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cords, M., and Rowell, T. E. (1987). Birth intervals of cercopithecus monkeys of the Kakamega Forest, Kenya.Primates 28: 277–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cords, M., Mitchell, B. J., Tsingalia, H. M., and Rowell, T. E. (1986). Promiscuous mating among blue monkeys in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya.Etology 72: 214–226.Google Scholar
  11. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1982). Intraspecific variations in mating strategy. In Bateson, P. P. G., and Klopfer, P. H. (eds.), Perspectives in Ethology, Plenum Press, New York, Vol. 5, pp. 385–431.Google Scholar
  12. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1988).Primate Social Systems, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  13. Else, J. G., Eley, R. M., Suleman, M. A., and Lequin, R. M. (1985). Reproductive biology of Sykes and blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis).Am. J. primatol. 9: 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems.Science 197: 215–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall, K. R. L. (1965). Behaviour and ecology of the wild patas monkey,Erylhrocebus paras, in Uganda.J. Zool. (London) 148: 15–87.Google Scholar
  16. Harding, R. S. O., and Olson, D. K. (1986). Patterns of mating among male patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas). In Kenya.Am. J. Primatol. 11: 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Henzi, S. P., and Lawes, M. (1987). Breeding season influxes and the behaviour of adult male samango monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis albogularis).Folia primatol. 48: 125–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hogg, J. T. (1984). Mating in bighorn sheep: multiple creative male strategies.Science 225: 526–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laws, J. W., and Vonder Haar Laws, J. (1984). Social-interactions’among male langurs (Presbytis entellus) at Rajaji Wildlife Sanctuary.Int. J. Primatol. 5: 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moore, J. (1985).Demography and Sociality in Primates, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Rajpurohit, L. S., and Mohnot, S. M. (1988). Fate of ousted male residents of one-male bisexual troops of hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) at Jodhpur, Rajasthan (India).Hum. Evol. (in press).Google Scholar
  22. Rowell, T. E. (1988). Beyond the one-male group.Behaviour 104: 189–201.Google Scholar
  23. Rubenstein, D. I. (1980). On the evolution of alternative mating strategies. In Staddon, J. E. R. (ed.),Limits to Action, Academic Press, London, pp. 65–100.Google Scholar
  24. Rudran, R. (1978). Socioecology of the blue monkey (Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni) of the Kibale Forest, Uganda.Smithsonian Contrib. Zool. 249.Google Scholar
  25. Smuts, B. B. (1985).Sex and Friendship in Baboons, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. Sommer, V. (1988). Male competition and coalition in langurs (Presbytis entellus) at Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.Hum. Evol. (in press).Google Scholar
  27. Struhsaker, T. T. (1969). Correlates of ecology and social organization among African cercopithecines.Folia primatol. 11: 80–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Struhsaker, T. T., and Leland, L. (1979). Socioecology of five sympatric monkey species in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. In Rosenblatt, J. S., Hinde, R. A., Beer, C., and Busnel, M.-C. (Eds.),Advances in the Study of Behavior, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 9, pp. 159–228.Google Scholar
  29. Strum, S. C. (1982). Agonistic dominance in male baboons: An alternative view.Int. J. Primatol. 3: 175–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsingalia, H. M., and Rowell, T. E. (1984). The behavior of adult male blue monkeys.Z. Tierpsychol. 64: 253–268.Google Scholar
  31. Wittenberger, J. F. (1980). Group size and polygamy in social mammals.Am. Nat. 115: 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wrangham, R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups.Behaviour 75: 262–300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. P. Henzi
    • 1
  • M. Lawes
    • 2
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of NatalDurbanSouth Africa
  2. 2.Zoology DepartmentUniversity of NatalPietermaritzburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations