International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 509–519 | Cite as

Resource patch size and flexible foraging in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus)

  • Kim A. Phillips


White-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus)on Barro Colorado Island, Panama, have a flexible foraging strategy. Typically, foraging party size is small and individuals feed dispersed from one another. When seasonal fruiting of large volume trees occurs, the majority of the group forages simultaneously. As C. capucinusdo not display a rigorous dominance structure and there are few indications that individuals or coalitions monopolize food patches,individuals are expected to display scramble strategies instead of high frequencies of contest competition. I recorded foraging party size (simultaneous foragers), the total number of animals to feed successively, and the diameter at breast height (DBH) of fruit trees used in two habituated troops. Individuals in each group spent a substantial amount of time — 65 and 48% of foraging time for each group — foraging in party sizes of one. Monkeys predominantly foraged alone in small trees (0- to 20- cm DBH), successively in medium trees (21- to 60- cm DBH), and simultaneously in large trees (>61- cm DBH). They used small trees more frequently than all other tree classes. In medium-sized trees, although fruit was plentiful, space was limited. In these trees Cebusforaged successively. In large-volume trees, space and fruit were abundant and several individuals fed together. As the DBH of fruiting trees increased, the average foraging party size increased exponentially. Cebus capucinusat Barro Colorado Island modify their foraging party size to adapt to the seasonal patterns of fruit production.

Key words

Cebus patch use white-faced capuchins socioecology feeding ecology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, R. (1974). The evolution of social behavior.Annu. Rev. Ecol. System. 4: 325–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods.Behaviour 49: 227–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altmann, S. (1974). Baboons, space, time and energy.Am. Zool. 14: 221–248.Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury, J., and Vehrencamp, S. (1976). Social organization and foraging in emballonurid bats. II. A model for the determination of group size.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1: 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckley, J. S. (1983).The Feeding Behavior, Social Behavior, and Ecology of the White-Faced Monkey, Cebus capucinusat Trujillo, Northern Honduras, Central America, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.Google Scholar
  6. Chapman, C. A. (1990). Ecological constraints on group size in three species of Neotropical primates.Folia Primatol. 55: 1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fedigan, L. (1993). Sex differences and intersexual relations in adult white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus).Int. J. Primatol. 14: 853–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glander, K. E., Fedigan, L. M., Fedigan, L., and Chapman, C. (1991). Field methods for capture and measurement of three monkey species in Costa Rica.Folia Primatol. 57: 70–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hladik, A., and Hladik, C. M. (1969). Rapports trophiques entre vegetation et primates dans la foret de Barro Colorado, Panama.Terre Vie 1: 25–117.Google Scholar
  10. Leighton, M., and Leighton, D. R. (1982). The relationship of size of feeding aggregate to size of food patch: Howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) feeding inTrichilia cipo fruit trees on Barro Colorado Island.Biotropica 14: 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lehner, P. N. (1979).Handbook of Ethological Methods, Garland STPM Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Maxwell, S. E., and Delaney, H. D. (1990).Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data, Brooks/Cole, California.Google Scholar
  13. Mitchell, B. J. (1989).Resources, Group Behavior, and Infant Development in White-Faced Capuchin Monkeys, Cebus capucinus, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  14. Nicholson, A. J. (1954). An outline of the dynamics of animal populations.Austral J. Zool. 2: 9–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. O’Brien, T. G. (1991). Female-male social interactions in wedge-capped capuchin monkeys: Benefits and costs of group living.Anim. Behav. 41: 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Brien, T. G., and Robinson, J. G. (1991). Allomaternal care by female wedge-capped capuchin monkeys: Effects of age, rank and relatedness.Behaviour 119: 30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oppenheimer, J. R. (1968).Behavior and Ecology of the White-Faced Monkey, Cebus capucinuson Borro Colorado Island, Canal Zone, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
  18. Rose, L. M. (1994). Sex differences in diet and foraging behaviour in white-faced capuchins,Cebus capucinus.Int. J. Primatol. 15: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Strier, K. B. (1989). Effects of patch size on feeding associations in muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoïdes).Folia Primatol. 52: 70–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Symington, M. M. (1990). Fission-fusion social organizationin Ateles andPan.Int. J. Primatol. 11: 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Terborgh, J. (1983).Five New World Primates, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  22. Terborgh, Jr., and Janson, C. H. (1986). The socioecology of primate groups.Annu. Rev. Ecol. System. 17: 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Schaik, C. P. (1989). The ecology of social relationships amongst female primates. In Standen, V., and Foley, R. A. (eds.),Comparative Socioecology: The Behavioral Ecology of Humans and Other Mammals, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp. 195–218.Google Scholar
  24. van Schaik, C. P., and van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1983). On the ultimate causes of primate social systems.Behaviour 85: 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wrangham, R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups.Behaviour 75: 262–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim A. Phillips
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthens

Personalised recommendations