Skip to main content
Log in

Vocal-auditory functions in the chimpanzee: Vowel perception

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The perception of vowels was studied in chimpanzees and humans, using a reaction time task in which reaction times for discrimination of vowels were taken as an index of similarity between vowels. Vowels used were five synthetic and natural Japanese vowels and eight natural French vowels. The chimpanzees required long reaction times for discrimination of synthetic [i] from [u] and [e] from [o], that is, they need long latencies for discrimination between vowels based on differences in frequency of the second formant. A similar tendency was observed for discrimination of natural [i] from [u]. The human subject required long reaction times for discrimination between vowels along the first formant axis. These differences can be explained by differences in auditory sensitivity between the two species and the motor theory of speech perception. A vowel, which is pronounced by different speakers, has different acoustic properties. However, humans can perceive these speech sounds as the same vowel. The phenomenon of perceptual constancy in speech perception was studied in chimpanzees using natural vowels and a synthetic [o]- [a] continuum. The chimpanzees ignored the difference in the sex of the speakers and showed a capacity for vocal tract normalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chiba, T., and Kajiyama, M. (1941).The Vowel: Its Nature and Structure, Tokyo-Kaiseikan, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, J. H. (1934). Auditory acuity of chimpanzee.J. Comp. Psychol. 17: 157–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, J. H. (1935). The upper limit of hearing in chimpanzee.Am. J. Physiol. 112: 109–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrer, D. M., and Prim, N. M. (1965). A preliminary report on auditory frequency threshold comparisons of humans and pre-adolescent chimpanzees. Technical Report No. 65-6, 6571st Aeromedical Research Laboratory, Holloman Air Force Base, N.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki, H., and Kawashima, T. (1968). The roles of pitch and higher formats in the perception of vowels.IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. AU-16: 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda, Y., Sakamoto, Y., and Kuroki, S. (1976). Promotive effect of residual hearing upon speech reading.J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. 32: 271–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. A., and Gardner, B. T. (1969). Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee.Science 165: 664–672.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, D. H. (1980). Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67: 971–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, S. (1986). Hearing, voice perception and vocal behavior in the chimpanzee.Transactions of the Committee on Speech Research/Hearing Research, Acoustical Society of Japan, S85-88/H-86-14.

  • Kojima, S. (1987). Hearing in a chimpanzee.Ann. Bull. RILP. 21: 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, S. (1988). Audition, speech perception and phonation of the chimpanzee: A search for the origin of human speech.Primate Res. 4: 44–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, S. (1989). A comparison of auditory functions in the chimpanzee and human.Folia primatol. (in press).

  • Kuhl, P. (1979). Speech perception in early infancy: perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66: 1668–1679.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, A., Cooper, F., Shankweiler, D., and Studdert-Kenedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code.Psychol. Rev. 74: 431–461.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. (1968). Primate vocalizations and human linguistic ability.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44: 1574–1584.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. (1975).On the Origins of Language: An Introduction to the Evolution of Human Speech, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. (1984).The Biology and Evolution of Language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. (1986). Some aspects of dimorphism and human speech.Hum. Evol. 1: 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marler, P., and Tenaza, R. C. (1977). Signalling behaviour of apes with special reference to vocalizations. In Sebeok, T. E. (ed.),How Animals Communicate, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 965–1033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, B., and Wang, W. S.-Y. (1968). Perceptual distance and the specification of phonological features.Phonetica 18: 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G. E., and Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 24: 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D. (1976).Intelligence in Ape and Man, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J..

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, D. (1977).Language Learning by a Chimpanzee, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon, C. T., Brown, C. H., and Petersen, M. R. (1982).Primate Communication, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kojima, S., Kiritani, S. Vocal-auditory functions in the chimpanzee: Vowel perception. Int J Primatol 10, 199–213 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735200

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735200

Key words

Navigation