Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

, Volume 102, Issue 1, pp 203–216 | Cite as

Hyperon-nucleon scattering

  • J. J. de Swart
  • T. A. Rijken
  • P. M. Maessen
  • R. G. E. Timmermans


The Nijmegen soft-core potential model is discussed in the context of modern views in strong interactions. TheNN version of this model is compared with some other, the so-called realisticNN potentials. A nice feature of this potential model is that it can easily be extended to the YN channels usingSU(3). It will be shown that the YN version of this model gives a high-quality fit to the existing experimental YN data. Not only the scattering data are described very well, but also the capture ratio at rest is very good, and theF/(F+D) ratioαPS for the PV-coupling of the pseudoscalar mesons used in this model, could be kept in perfect agreement with the value from the weak interactions. Finally the reaction\(\bar p\)p→\(\bar \Lambda \)Λ will be discussed.


21.80 - Hypernuclei 


13.75.Ev - Hyperon-nucleon interactions (energy⩽10 GeV) 


13.75.Cs - Nucleon-nucleon interactions, includings antinucleon, deuteron, etc. (energy⩽10 GeV) 

Гиперон-нуклонное рассеяние


Обсуждается модель потенциала Неймегена в контексте современного подхода к теории сильных вэаимодействий.NN-вариант зтой модели сравнивается с некоторыми другими, так наэываемыми реалистическимиNN-потенциалами. Наиболее важная характеристика зтой модели потенциала может быть легко обобшена на YN-каналы, испоьэуяSU(3). Покаэывается, что YN-вариант зтой модели качественно согласуется с сушествуюшими зкспериментальными YN-данными. Хорощо описываются не только данные по рассеянию, а также отнощение эахвата в покое является очень хорощим иF/(R +D) отнощение αps для PV-свяэи псевдоскалярных меэонов, испольэованных в зтой модели, хорощо согласуется с величиной, полученной иэ слабых вэаимодействий. В эаключение, обсуждается реакция\(\bar p\)p→\(\bar \Lambda \)Λ.


Si discute il modello di potenziale di Nijmegen del soft core nell’ambito delle prospettive moderne nelle interazioni forti. La versioneNN di questo modello si confronta con altri cosiddetti potenziali realistici YNN. Una caratteristica piacevole di questo modello di potenziale è che questo si può estendere facilmente ai canali YN usandoSU(3). Si mostra che la versione di YN di questo modello fornisce un’approssimazione di alta qualità dei dati sperimentali disponibili YN. Non solo si descrivono i dati di scattering molto bene, ma anche il rapporto di cattura in quiete è molto buono, e il rapportoF/(F+D)αPS per l’accoppiamento PV dei mesoni pseudoscalari usato in questo modello si può prendere in perfetto accordo con il valore ottenuto dalle interazioni deboli. Infine si discute la reazione\(\bar p\)p→\(\bar \Lambda \)Λ.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    M. M. Nagels, T. A. Rijken andJ. J. de Swart:Phys. Rev. D,17, 768 (1978).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    J. J. de Swart, T. A. Rijken, P. M. M. Maessen, R. G. E. Timmermans andA. G. M. Verschuren:Proceedings of the 1986 International Symposium on «Hypernuclear Physics», August 1986, Tokyo, edited byH. Bando, O. Hashimoto andK. Ogawa, p. 303.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    J. J. de Swart, T. A. Rijken andR. G. E. Timmermans:Proceedings of the Conference Rockport Maine (1988);R. G. E. Timmermans, T. A. Rijken andJ. J. de Swart:Proceedings of the IX European Symposium on Proton-Antiproton Interactions and Fundamental Symmetries (Mainz, 1988).Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    J. R. Begervoet, P. C. van Campen, W. M. Derks, T. A. Rijken, W. A. van der Sanden, J. J. de Swart andP. H. Timmers: Quarks and theNN andNN interaction, inProceedings of the Conference on «Quarks and Nuclear Structure», Bad Honnef, p. 390;P. H. A. Timmers, R. G. E. Timmermans, T. A. Rijken andJ. J. de Swart:Few Body Systems, Supp. 2 (1987), p. 509 (Proceedings of the European Conference on Few-Body Physics, Fontevraud);R. G. E. Timmermans, T. A. Rijken andJ. J. de Swart:Pmatrix model for antibaryon-baryon reactions, inProceedings of the IV LEAR Workshop, Villars-sur-Ollon, p. 357;J. J. de Swart, T. A. Rijken andR. G. E. Timmermans:Proceedings Conference Rockport Main (1988).Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Particle Data Group:Phys. Lett. B,170, 1 (1986).Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    P. D. B. Collins andE. J. Squires:Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, Vol.45 (1968);P. D. B. Collins:Phys. Rep. C,1, 105 (1971).Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    V. Barger andM. Olsson:Phys. Rev.,148, 1428 (1966).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    F. E. Low:Phys. Rev. D,12, 163 (1975);S. Nussinov:Phys. Rev. Lett.,34, 1286 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    C. E. Jones: Lawrence Radiation Laboratory Report UCRL-10700 (1962, unpublished);N. N. Khuri:Phys. Rev.,130, 429 (1963).Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    G. F. Chew:Prog. Theor. Phys., Suppl., Commemoration Issue for the 30th Anniversary of the Meson Theory by Dr.H. Yukawa (1965), p. 118;Phys. Rev. B,140, 1427 (1965).Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    T. A. Rijken:One-boson-exchange models and Regge poles, Ph. D. Thesis University of Nijmegen (1975), unpblished;T. A. Rijken:OBE-models and Regge poles, inProceedings of the International Conference on Few Body Problems in Nuclear and Particle Physics (Quebec, 1974), p. 136.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    T. A. Rijken:Ann. Phys. (N.Y.),164, 1, 23 (1985).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    J. J. de Swart andM. M. Nagels:Fortschr. Phys.,28, 215 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    M. H. MacGregor, R. A. Arndt andR. M. Wright:Phys. Rev.,182, 1714 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    J. R. Bergervoet, P. C. van Campen, T. A. Rijken andJ. J. de Swart:Phys. Rev. C,38, 770 (1988).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    V. Stoks, R. Klomp, J.-L. de Kok, T. A. Rijken andJ. J. de Swart: in preparation.Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    T. Hamada andI. D. Johnston:Nucl. Phys.,34, 382 (1962);T. Hamada, Y. Nakamura andR. Tamagaki:Prog. Theor. Phys.,33, 769 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    R. V. Reid jr.:Ann. Phys. (N.Y.),50, 411 (1968);B. D. Day:Phys. Rev. C,24, 1203 (1981).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    M. Lacombe, B. Loiseau, J. M. Richard, R. Vinh Mau, J. Côté, P. Pires andR. de Tourreil:Phys. Rev. C,21, 861 (1980).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    R. B. Wiringa, R. A. Smith andT. L. Ainsworth:Phys. Rev. C,29, 1207 (1984).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    R. Machleidt, K. Holinde andCh. Elster:Phys. Rep.,149, 1 (1987).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    R. Klomp, J.-J. de Kok, V. Stoks, J. R. Bergervoet, P. C. van Campen, T. A. Rijken andJ. J. de Swart: in preparation.Google Scholar
  23. (23).
    J. R. Bergervoet, P. C. van Campen, R. Klomp, J.-L. de Kok, T. A. Rijken, V. Stoks andJ. J. de Swart: in preparation.Google Scholar
  24. (24).
    M. H. Macfarlane: private communications.Google Scholar
  25. (25).
    G. Veneziano:Nucl. Phys. B,117, 519 (1976);E. Witten,Nucl. Phys. B,160, 57 (1979).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    R. Dolen, D. Horn andC. Schmid:Phys. Rev.,166, 1768 (1968);H. Harari:Phys. Rev. Lett.,20, 1395 (1968);F. J. Gilman, H. Harari andY. Zarmi:Phys. Rev. Lett.,21, 323 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    See, for various reviews,Proceedings of the Lund International Conference on Elementary Particles, Lund, Sweden 1969, edited byG. von Dardel.Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    M. M. Nagels, T. A. Rijken andJ. J. de Swart:Phys. Rev. D,15, 2547 (1977);M. M. Nagels, T. A. Rijken andJ. J. de Swart:Phys. Rev. D,20, 1633 (1979).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    S. L. Adler:Phys. Rev. B,137, 1022 (1965);S. Weinberg:Phys. Rev. Lett.,17, 617 (1966).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    O. Dumbrajs, R. Koch, H. Pilkuhn, G. C. Oades, H. Behrens, J. J. de Swart andP. Kroll:Nucl. Phys. B,216, 277 (1983).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    J. J. Sakurai:Ann. Phys. (N.Y.),11, 1 (1960).MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    B. Sakita andK. C. Wali:Phys. Rev. B,139, 1355 (1965).MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    V. Hepp andH. Schleich:Z. Phys.,214, 71 (1968);D. Stephen: Ph. D. Thesis University of Massachusetts (1970), unpublished.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    G. Alexander, U. Karshon, A. Shapira, G. Yekutieli, R. Engelmann, H. Filthuth andW. Lughofer:Phys. Rev.,173, 1452 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    B. Sechi-Zorn, B. Kehoe, J. Twitty andR. A. Burnstein:Phys. Rev.,175, 1735 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    R. Engelmann, H. Filthuth, V. Hepp andE. Kluge:Phys. Lett.,21, 587 (1966).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. (37).
    F. Eisele, H. Filthuth, W. Fölisch, V. Hepp, E. Leitner andG. Zech:Nucl. Phys. B,37, 204 (1971).Google Scholar
  38. (38).
    J. Carlson andB. F. Gibson: private communications (September 1988).Google Scholar
  39. (39).
    F. Tabakin andR. A. Eisenstein:Phys. Rev. C,31, 1857 (1985);P. H. Timmers: Ph. D. Thesis University of Nijmegen (1985), unpublished;M. Kohno andW. Weise:Phys. Lett. B,179, 15 (1985);S. Furui andA. Faessler:Nucl. Phys. A,468, 669 (1987).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    R. G. Timmermans, T. A. Rijken andJ. J. de Swart:Nucl. Phys. A,479, 383 (1988); also see ref. (3).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    P. D. Barnes et al.: Threshold measurement of the reaction \(\bar p\)p→\(\bar \Lambda \)Λ at LEAR, inProceedings of the IV LEAR Workdhop, Villars-sur-Ollon, p. 347;R. von Frankenberg: private communications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. J. de Swart
    • 1
  • T. A. Rijken
    • 1
  • P. M. Maessen
    • 1
  • R. G. E. Timmermans
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations