Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

, Volume 107, Issue 11, pp 2657–2671 | Cite as

HADRON ’93: Theory



A review is presented of today’s theoretical status of hadronic physics. It is shown that the Generally Accepted QCD (GAQCD) is faulty in both its theoretical foundations, and its comparisons with some recent experiments. A viable alternative to GAQCD, Anisotropic Chromo Dynamics (ACD), is shown to arise from QCD, when a study of its likely true ground state is carried out. Results and perspectives of this approach are presented and compared with the theoretical lines «en vogue».


PACS 12.00 Specific theories and interaction models particle systematics PACS 01.30.Cc Conference proceedings 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    See, for instance,G. Preparata:Why are quark (and gluons) confined? MITH 93/18, Milano, June 1993, Preprint, to appear in theProceedings of the VIII Winter School on «Hadronic Physics» — Folgaria, 1–6 February 1993.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    G. K. Savvidy:Phys. Lett. B,71, 133 (1977).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    G. Preparata:Nuovo Cimento A,96, 366 (1986).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    E142Collaboration P. L. Anthony (et al.):Determination of the neutron structure function, SLAC-PUB-6101 (1993), preprint.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    SMCCollaboration (B. Adeva et al.):Phys. Lett. B,302, 533 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. G. Petratos: these proceedings, p. 2197.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Lowe: these proceedings, p. 2183.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. G. Ratcliffe: these proceedings, p. 2211.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    EMCCollaboration (J. Ashman et al.):Phys. Lett. B,206, 364 (1988).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. D. Bjorken:Phys. Rev.,148, 1467 (1966);J. D. Bjorken:Phys. Rev. D,1, 376 (1970).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. Creutz: these proceedings, p. 2595.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    L. Gamberale: these proceedings, p. 2603.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    L. F. Abbot:Nucl. Phys. B,185, 169 (1981).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    H. Nielsen andP. Olesen:Nucl. Phys. B,106, 380 (1979).MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Consoli andG. Preparata:Phys. Lett. B,154, 411 (1985).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    S.-S. Xue: these proceedings, p. 2645; see alsoL. Cosmai andG. Preparata:Phys. Rev. Lett.,57, 2613 (1986);L. Gamberale, G. Preparata andS.-S. Xue:Nuovo Cimento A,105, 309 (1992);L. Gamberale, G. Preparata andS.-S. Xue:Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.),17, 731 (1990).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    H. D. Trottier andR. M. Woloshin:Phys. Rev. Lett.,70, 2053 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    L. Gamberale, G. Preparata andS.-S. Xue:Comment on «Savvidy Ferromagnetic vacuum’ in three-dimensional lattice gauge theory, MITH 93/10, Milano, April 1993, to appear inPhys. Rev. Lett. Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    L. Maiani, G. Martinelli, G. C. Rossi andM. Testa:Nucl. Phys. B,273, 275 (1986).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    G. Preparata:Nuovo Cimento A,96, 394 (1986).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    P. Castorina andM. Consoli:Phys. Lett. B,213, 493 (1988).MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    A. Giannelli, L. Nitti, G. Preparata andP. Sforza:Phys. Lett. B,150, 214 (1985).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    G. Preparata:Phys. Lett. B,102, 327 (1981).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    For a discussion of these theoretical aspects, as well as a formulation of a general strategy to solve ACD, seeG. Preparata:Nuovo Cimento A,103, 1073 (1990).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    P. Cea, G. Nardulli andG. Preparata:Z. Phys. C,16, 135 (1982).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    G. Preparata:Phys. Rev. D,7, 2973 (1973).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    G. Preparata:Nucl. Phys. B,122, 29 (1977).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    E. De Rafael: these proceedings, p. 2573.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    M. Olsson: these proceedings, p. 2541.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Yu. A. Simonov: these proceedings, p. 2629.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    M. Scorletti: these proceedings, p. 2617, 2623.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    G. ’t Hooft:Phys. Rev. Lett.,37, 8 (1976);G.’t Hooft:Phys. Rev. D,14, 3432 (1976).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    S. Marchi: these proceedings, p. 2609; see alsoL. Gamberale, S. Marchi andG. Preparata:A calculation of the masses and mixing angle of the η and η′ mesons, MITH 93/1, Milano, January, preprint.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    M. Verpelli: these proceedings, p. 2553.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    F. Low:Phys. Rev. D,12, 163 (1975);S. Nussinov:Phys. Rev. Lett.,34, 1286 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Fisica dell’UniversitàMilano
  2. 2.Sezione di MilanoINFNMilano

Personalised recommendations