An epistemologically arrogant community of contending scholars: A pre-socratic perspective on the past, present, and future of the Pavlovian Society
- 29 Downloads
The paper begins with a statement of the Society’s purpose and its pre-Socratic roots. The Society differs from other contemporary scientific and scientific-professional societies in that it is thoroughly apolitical, unusually open to discussion and debate, and has had a restricted scholarly written impact. I then suggest and interpret six phases in the Society’s history: (1) the pre-Socratic roots; (2) Pavlov and the young Gantt; (3) the Society’s Gantt score of years; (4) the Joe McGuigan decade; (5) the Stewart Wolf era; (6) reforming the Society. I conclude with the hope that even if the content of the Society’s interests changes, it will preserve the pre-Socratic approach against the various forms of intellectual barbarism that continue to arise.
KeywordsPre-Socratics disinterested discussion conflict of ideas contending scholars Pavlovian procedures
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anderson, J. (1961).Studies in Empirical Philosophy, Sydney University Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
- Burnet, J. (1930).Early Greek Philosophy, London, A&C Black.Google Scholar
- Furedy, J.J. (1992b). Pavlov, Ivan. In:The Encyclopedia of Learning and Memory, L. Squire, (Ed.), pp. 513–516, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Girgorian, N.A. (1974). Pavlov, Ivan Petrovich.Dictionary of scientific biography, 10, 431–435, New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
- McGuigan, J. (1990). Letter to the March, 1990 extraordinary meeting of the society's executive committee chaired by S. Wolf at Bangor, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar