Advertisement

Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 1122–1128 | Cite as

Violation of conservation of strangeness-changing current

  • Riazuddin
Lettere Alla Redazione

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    Riazuddin:Phys. Rev.,134, B 235 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Y. Nambu andJ. Sakurai:Phys. Rev. Lett.,11, 42 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    N. Cabibbo:Phys. Rev. Lett.,10, 531 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    R. E. Marshak, C. Ryan, T. K. Radha andK. Raman:Phys. Rev. Lett.,11, 396 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    M. Gell-Mann:Proc. of the 1960 Intern. Conference on High-Energy Physics at Rochester, August 1960.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    J. Bernstein andS. Weinberg:Phys. Rev. Lett.,5, 481 (1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    H. Chew:Phys. Rev. Lett.,8, 297 (1962);S. W. McDowell:Theoretical Physics (p. 619), International Atomic Energy Agency (Vienna, 1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    G. Zweig:Phys. Rev.,130, 2419 (1963);N. Brene, L. Egardt, B. Quist andD. A. Geffen:Nucl. Phys.,30, 399 (1962);D. Horn:Nuovo Cimento,29, 571 (1963). These authors have obtained a rapidly varyingf + form factor. Such a behavior forf + seems to be excluded experimentally as discussed in ref. (12).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    P. Dennery andH. Primakoff:Phys. Rev.,131, 1334 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    J. M. Dobbs, K. Landa, A. K. Mann, K. Reibel, F. J. Sciulli, H. Uto, D. H. White andK. K. Young:Phys. Rev. Lett.,8, 295 (1962);A. M. Boyarski, E. C. Lah, L. Q. Niemela, D. M. Ritson, R. Weinstein andS. Ozaki:Phys. Rev.,128, 2398 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    D. Luers, I. S. Mittra, W. J. Willis andS. S. Yammamoto:Phys. Rev. Lett.,7, 255 (1961);B. P. Roe, D. Sinclair, J. L. Brown, D. A. Glaser, J. A. Kadyk andG. H. Trilling:Phys. Rev. Lett.,7, 346 (1961);J. L. Brown, J. A. Kadyk, G. H. Trilling, R. T. Van de Walle, B. P. Roe andD. Sinclair:Phys. Rev. Lett.,7, 423 (1961) and UCRL-10205 (unpublished).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    W. J. Willis:Weak Interaction Conference, Brookhaven (September 1963). Experimental situation regarding K13 decay is summarized in this paper.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    M. L. Goldberger andS. B. Treiman:Phys. Rev.,110, 1178 (1958).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (15).
    We have obtained this branching ratio by using formula (9) of ref. (9), in which we have put ξ=0.7, λ+ ≈ 0.32, λ ≈ 0.79 as given by our form factors.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (16).
    M. Gell-Mann:Lectures on Weak Interactions, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (Bombay, 1961).Google Scholar
  16. (17).
    N. Brene, L. Egardt andB. Quist:Nucl. Phys.,22, 553 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Proprietà Letteraria Riservata 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riazuddin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of RochesterRochester

Personalised recommendations