Advertisement

Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 599–614 | Cite as

On a Lee model with a four-point coupling

  • R. B. Marr
  • Y. Shimamoto
Article

Summary

It is shown that a modified Lee model in which a four-point interaction involving the N and θ particles is appended to the original trilinear interaction is soluble and provides a convenient example for the discussion of CDD poles. The parameters of the model may be selected in such a way as to allow the existence ofa) two stable particles, orb) one stable and one unstable particle with the quantum numbers of a V-particle. The N-θ scattering amplitude is compared with that of a Lee model with two V-particles.

Riassunto

Si dimostra che un modello di Lee modificato, in cui una interazione a quattro punti che coinvolge la particella N e θ è aggiunta all’interazione trilineare originaria, è risolubile e fornisce un esempio conveniente per la discussione dei poli di CDD. Si possono scegliere i parametri del modello in modo da consentire l’esistenza dia) due particelle stabili, ob) una particella stabile ed una particella instabile con i numeri quantici di una particella V. Si confronta l’ampiezza dello scattering N-θ con quella di un modello di Lee con due particelle V.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    T. D. Lee:Phys. Rev.,95, 1329 (1954);G. Källén andW. Pauli:Dan. Math. Fys. Medd.,30, no. 7 (1955).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    V. Glaser andG. Källén:Nucl. Phys.,2, 706 (1956);M. Lévy:Nuovo Cimento,13, 115 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    H. Araki, Y. Munakata, M. Kawaguchi andT. Gotō:Prog. Theor. Phys. (Kyoto),17, 419 (1957);K. Naito:Prog. Theor. Phys. (Kyoto),18, 200 (1957);N. Nakanishi:Prog. Theor. Phys. (Kyoto),19, 607 (1958).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    L. Castillejo, R. Dalitz andF. Dyson:Phys. Rev.,101, 453 (1956).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    F. Dyson:Phys. Rev.,106, 157 (1957).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    M. T. Vaughn, R. Aaron andR. D. Amado:Phys. Rev.,124, 1258 (1961).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    P. K. Srivastava:Phys. Rev.,128, 2906 (1962).MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    A. Salam:Nuovo Cimento,25, 224 (1962); see alsoS. Weinberg:Phys. Rev.,130, 776 (1963).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    K. Nishijima:Prog. Theor. Phys. (Kyoto),17, 765 (1957);W. Zimmerman:Nuovo Cimento,4, 19 (1958).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    The conditionZ=0, whereZ is the renormalization constant, is proposed by many authors as a way of distinguishing a bound state from an elementary particle. See ref. (6) and alsoJ. C. Houard andB. Jouvet:Nuovo Cimento,18, 466 (1960).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    This interaction is equivalent to the separable potential mode discussed in ref. (6).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    M. Baker:Ann. Phys.,4, 271 (1958).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    H. Lehmann:Nuovo Cimento,11, 342 (1954).MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    M. L. Goldberger andS. Treiman:Phys. Rev.,113, 1663 (1959).MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. (16).
    G. F. Chew andS. C. Frautschi:Phys. Rev.,123, 1478 (1961);R. Blankenbecler andM. L. Goldberger:Phys. Rev.,126, 766 (1962).MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. B. Marr
    • 1
  • Y. Shimamoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Brookhaven National LaboratoryUpton, Long Island

Personalised recommendations