Advertisement

Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 1301–1304 | Cite as

The excited hyperon and pion-hyperon resonances

  • S. F. Tuan
Lettere Alla Redazione

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. (1).
    R. H. Dalitz andS. F. Tuan:Ann. Phys.,8, 100 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    R. H. Dalitz andS. F. Tuan:Phys. Rev. Lett.,2, 425 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    R. H. Dalitz andS. F. Tuan:Ann. Phys.,10, 307 (1960).MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    M. Alston et al.:Proc. of the Intern. Rochester Conference on High-Energy Physics (1960, to be published). Also private communication from Prof.Good.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Rodberg andThaler [Phys. Rev., Lett.,4, 372 (1960)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    P. T. Matthews:Proc. of the Intern. Conference on High-Energy Physics (1960, to be published).Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    L. W. Alvarez:Proc. of the Intern. Kiev Conference on High-Energy Physics (1959, to be published).Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    J. D. Jackson andH. W. Wyld:Phys Rev. Lett.,2, 355 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    We wish to emphasize again that « attraction » and « repulsion » in our terminology imply nothing further than that the real part of the forward scattering amplitude is positive (or negative), corresponding to constructive (or destructive) Coulomb-nuclear interference. The question whether a « repulsive » interaction is true repulsion or strong attraction can be decided only by higher energy behaviour. See in this connection,Karplus et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett.,2, 510 (1959)].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    P. T. Matthews andA. Salam:Phys. Rev. Lett.,2, 266 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    S. F. Tuan: EFINS-59-40 (1959), unpublished.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    M. Gell-Mann:Phys. Rev.,106, 1296 (1957).MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    J. J. Sakurai:Ann. Phys.,11, 1 (1960).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (15).
    J. Bowcock, W. N. Cottingham andD. Lurié:Phys. Rev. Lett.,5, 386 (1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (16).
    F. Ferrari, G. Frye andM. Pusterla:Phys. Rev. Rev.,4, 615 (1960).ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. (17).
    I would like to thank Dr.R. C. Hwa for an interesting discussion. A detailed study by Dr.Hwa is in progress.Google Scholar
  17. (18).
    Preliminary data suggest thatJ=3/2 is somewhat more likely (private communication from Prof.H. K. Ticho). In view of its importance to theoretical understanding, we would like to encourage a very accurate determination for this spin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. F. Tuan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsBrown UniversityProvidence

Personalised recommendations