Advertisement

Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 448–450 | Cite as

A remark on the paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen

  • R. Kawabe
Lettere Alla Redazione
  • 23 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    D. Bohm:Quantum Theory (New York, 1951), chap. XXII.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    H. S. Green:Nuovo Cimento,9, 880 (1958).M. Taketani had also suggested the same idea from a philosophical view point. SeeProblems of Dialectics (in Japanese, Rigakusha, Tokyo, 1945), p. 35.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky andN. Rosen:Phys. Rev.,47, 777 (1935); hereafter referred to as EPR.ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    N. Bohr:Phys. Rev.,48, 696 (1935);W. H. Furry:Phys. Rev.,49, 393, 176 (1936);D. Bohm: reference (1).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    D. Bohm andY. Aharonov:Phys. Rev.,108, 1070 (1957).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (7).
    D. Bohm:Causality and Chance in Modern Physics (London, 1957), chap. IV and alsoObservation and Interpretation (London, 1957), p. 33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1959

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Kawabe
    • 1
  1. 1.Physical InstituteNagoya UniversityNagoya

Personalised recommendations