Advertisement

Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 638–647 | Cite as

Diffusione elastica di raggi γ di 1.25 MeV in piombo

  • G. Manuzio
  • S. Vitale
Article

Riassunto

È stato misurato il grado di polarizzazione trasversale della radiazione di 1.25 MeV del60Co diffusa elasticamente su piombo a diversi angoli. Per un accurato confronto della situazione teorica con i risultati sperimentali occorrerebbero calcoli dettagliati del contributo degli elettroni dell’orbitaL allo scattering Rayleigh.

Summary

The degree of transverse polarization of the radiation from a source of60Co, elastically scattered by a lead target, has been measured at various angles. Experimental results are shown in Table I: a comparison has been made between these and the theoretical predictions for the contribution of the Thomson and Rayleigh effects. Amplitudes calculated forK electrons byBrown andMayers (6) have been used. For an accurate test of the theoretical situation by means of the experimental results, refined calculations ofL-shell contribution to Rayleigh scattering are needed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    M. Delbrück:Zeits. f. Phys.,84, 144 (1933).Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    W. Franz:Zeits. f. Phys.,95, 652 (1935).CrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    W. Franz:Zeits. f. Phys.,98, 314 (1936).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    G. E. Brown, R. E. Peierls eJ. B. Woodward:Proc. Roy. Soc., A227, 51 (1955).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    S. Brenner, G. E. Brown eJ. B. Woodward:Proc. Roy. Soc., A227, 59 (1955).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    G. E. Brown eD. F. Mayers:Proc. Roy. Soc., A242, 89 (1957).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    F. Röhrlich:Phys. Rev.,108, 169 (1957).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    P. Kessler:Journ. Phys. et Rad.,19, 739 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    A. M. Bernstein eA. K. Mann:Phys. Rev.,110, 805 (1958).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    A. K. Mann:Phys. Rev.,101, 4 (1956).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    P. Eberhard, L. Goldzahl, E. Hara eJ. Mey:Journ. Phys. et Rad.,17, 573 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    R. R. Wilson:Phys. Rev.,80, 720 (1953).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    S. Messelt eA. Storruste:Proc. Phys. Soc., A69, 381 (1956).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    N. Cindro eK. Ilakovac:Nucl. Phys.,5, 647 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (*).
    Mentre questo lavoro era in corso sono state in realtà pubblicate due misure di polarizzazione (15,16).Google Scholar
  16. (15).
    B. S. Sood:Proc. Roy. Soc.,247, 375 (1958).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. (16).
    F. Fuschini, D. S. R. Murty eP. Veronesi:Nuovo Cimento,15, 847 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (17).
    H. Böbel eG. Passatore:Nuovo Cimento,15, 979 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (18).
    M. Deutsch eF. Metzger:Phys. Rev.,74, 1542 (1948).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1961

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Manuzio
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Vitale
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Istituto di Fisica dell’UniversitàGenova
  2. 2.Istituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareSezione di GenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations