Skip to main content
Log in

Spin-zero pole dominance in the weak and electromagnetic interactions of the K-meson

Доминантность полюса с нулевым спином в слабых и злектромагнитных вэаимодействиях К меэона

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

Summary

The assumption of π, η and σ dominance of the weak and electromagnetic decays of the K-meson is examined using the hard-meson current algebra amplitudes for the strong-interaction factors. The K → 3π decay spectrum, the K 0 L → 2γ decay and the K 0 L -K 0 S mass difference are calculated and compared with experiment.

Riassunto

Si esamina l’ipotesi della predominanza di π, η e σ nei decadimenti deboli ed elettromagnetici del mesone K facendo uso delle ampiezze dell’algebra delle correnti del mesone duro per i fattori dell’interazione forte. Si calcolano lo spettro del decadimento K → 3π, il decadimento K 0 L → 2γ e la differenza di massa K 0 L -K 0 S e li si confrontano con i dati sperimentali.

Реэюме

Испольэуя амплитуды алгебры токов жестких меэонов для факторов сильных вэаимодействий, исследуется предположение π, η и σ доминантности в слабых и злектромагнитных распадах К меэона. Вычисляются и сравниваются с зкспериментом спектр распада К → 3π, распад К 0 L → 2γ и раэность масс К 0 L -К{S/0}.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. C. Lovelace:Phys. Lett.,28 B, 265 (1968).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. A. B. Bég andP. C. DeCelles:Phys. Rev. Lett.,8, 46 (1962);G. Barton andS. P. Rosen:Phys. Rev. Lett.,8, 414 (1962);K. C. Wali:Phys. Rev. Lett.,9, 120 (1962);C. Kacser:Phys. Rev.,130, 355 (1963);S. Oneda andJ. C. Pati:Phys. Rev.,155, 1618, 1621 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Arnowitt, M. H. Friedman andP. Nath:Phys. Rev. Lett.,19, 1085 (1967);H. Schnitzer andS. Weinberg:Phys. Rev.,164, 1828 (1967);S. G. Brown andG. B. West:Phys. Rev. Lett.,19, 812 (1967);D. A. Geffen:Phys. Rev. Lett.,19, 770 (1967);T. Das, V. Mathur andS. Okubo:Phys. Rev. Lett.,19, 900 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Arnowitt, M. H. Friedman, P. Nath andR. Suitor:Phys. Rev. Lett.,20, 475 (1968);Phys. Rev.,175, 1820 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Arnowitt, M. H. Friedman andP. Nath:Phys. Lett.,27 B, 657 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. As is well known, agreement with decay spectra can only be achieved by suppressing the second class of diagrams. See, for example,M. Jacob, C. H. Llewellyn Smith andS. Pokorski:Nuovo Cimento,63 A, 574 (1969).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. I. S. Gerstein, B. W. Lee, H. T. Nieh andH. J. Schnitzer:Phys. Rev. Lett.,19, 1064 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Weinberg:Phys. Rev. Lett.,17, 616 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A detailed comparison of the hard-meson ππ predictions with experiment can be found in the survey byR. Arnowitt:Proceedings of the Conference on ππ and Kπ Interactions (Argonne, Ill., 1969), p. 619.

  10. Particle Data Group:Rev. Mod. Phys.,42, 87 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. The spectra for K0→3π0 are approximately flat. The K→2ππ+ decay spectrum is shown in ref. (10).

  12. Particle Data Group:Rev. Mod. Phys.,42, 87 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. This is in contrast with other models that have proposed rapidly varying off-shell dependence,e.g.,Riazuddin andA. Q. Sarker:Phys. Rev. Lett.,20, 1455 (1968);S. Brown andG. W. West:Phys. Rev.,174, 1777 (1968). This off-shell variation is not needed by other data.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. E. Marshak, Riazuddin andC. P. Ryan:Theory of Weak Interactions in Particle Physics (New York, 1969), p. 622.

  15. K. Nishijima:Phys. Rev. Lett.,12, 39 (1964);R. Rockmore andT. Yao:Phys. Rev. Lett.,18, 503 (1967);K. Kang andD. Land:Phys. Rev. Lett.,18, 503 (1967);P. W. Coulter:Phys. Rev. D,2, 2725 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cf. talks byE. Malamud, P. Schlein andL. J. Gutay:Proceedings of the Conference on ππandInteractions (Argonne, Ill., 1969).

  17. Note, however, that the current algebra constraints forbid (4) λ1=0, so no singularity can occur in eq. (12).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Recently,R. Rockmore:Phys. Rev. D,2, 2693 (1970) has calculatedΔ s and obtained a result that is about twice as large as the text value. This is due mainly to the fact that a different model of ππ interactions has been used. In Rockmore’s model, it is not possible to fit a down-up or up-up phase-shift solution (as required by the present π+π scattering data) but only an up-down solution.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

To speed up publication, the authors of this paper have agreed to not receive the proofs for correction.

Research supported in part by the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnowitt, R., Friedman, M.H., Nath, P. et al. Spin-zero pole dominance in the weak and electromagnetic interactions of the K-meson. Nuov Cim A 4, 765–772 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02731518

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02731518

Navigation