Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 115–124 | Cite as

Photoreactions as a probe for nuclear structure in deformed nuclei

  • P. Christillin
  • M. Rosa-Clot


The consequences of the anisotropy of the distribution of exchanged pions, which is opposite to the nuclear deformation, are examined in the treatment of photoreactions on medium-heavy deformed nuclei. A new relation is derived for the connection of the energy splitting of the giant-dipole resonance with nuclear deformation.

Фотореакции как метод исследования ядерной структуры в деформированных ядрах


Исследуется аниэотропия распределения обменных пионов в эависимости от деформации ядер при рассмотрении фотореакций на среднетяжелых деформированных ядрах. Выводится новое соотнощение для свяэи знергии расшепления гигантского дипольного реэонанса с деформацией ядра.


Si esaminano le conseguenze dell’anisotropia nella distribuzione dei pioni di scambio opposta alla deformazione nucleare nel trattamento delle fotoreazioni per nuclei deformi medio pesanti. Si deriva una nuova relazione per la connessione tra la separazione in energia della risonanza gigante di dipolo e la deformazione nucleare.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    H. A. Bethe andJ. S. Levinger:Phys. Rev.,78, 115 (1950).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    P. Christillin andM. Rosa-Clot:Phys. Lett.,51 B, 125 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    P. Christillin andM. Rosa-Clot:Nuovo Cimento,28 A, 29 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    E. Hayward:Photonuclear reactions, National Bureau of Standards, Monograph No. 118 (Washington D. C., 1970).Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    P. Christillin andM. Rosa-Clot:Nuovo Cimento,32 A, 217 (1976).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    R. V. Reid:Ann. of Phys.,50, 411 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    S. G. Nilsson:Kgl. Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk., No. 29 (1955).Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    A. M. Green:Nucl. Phys.,33, 218 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    M. Danos:Nucl. Phys.,5, 23 (1958);K. Okamoto:Phys. Rev.,110, 143 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    B. L. Berman andS. C. Fultz:Rev. Mod. Phys.,47, 713 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    K. E. G. Löbner, M. Vetter andV. Hönig:Nucl. Data Tables,7, 495 (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    E. Ambler, E. G. Fuller andH. Marshak:Phys. Rev.,138, B 117 (1965).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    M. A. Kelly, B. L. Berman, R. L. Bramblett andS. C. Fultz:Phys. Rev.,179, 1194 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    H. E. Jackson andK. J. Wetzel:Phys. Rev. Lett.,28, 513 (1972);H. E. Jackson, G. E. Thomas andK. J. Wetzel:Phys. Rev. C,9, 1153 (1974);11, 1664 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    F. Ehlotzky andG. C. Sheppey:Nuovo Cimento,33, 1185 (1964);P. Papatzakos andK. Mork:Phys. Rev. D,12, 206 (1975);B. de Tollis, M. Lusignoli andG. Pistoni:Nuovo Cimento,32 A, 227 (1976).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    T. Bar Noy andR. Moreh:Nucl. Phys.,229 A, 417 (1974).ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. (18).
    S. F. Semenko:Nucl. Phys.,37, 486 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (19).
    H. Arenhövel, M. Danos andW. Greiner:Phys. Rev.,157, 1109 (1967).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. (20).
    B. L. Berman, M. A. Kelly, R. L. Bramblett, J. T. Caldwell, H. A. Davis andS. C. Fultz:Phys. Rev.,185, 1976 (1968).Google Scholar
  20. (21).
    D. L. Hendrie, N. K. Glendenning, B. G. Harvey, O. N. Jarvis, H. H. Duhm, J. Saudinos andJ. Mahoney:Phys. Lett.,26 B, 127 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. (22).
    V. A. Madsen, V. R. Brown andJ. D. Anderson:Phys. Rev. Lett.,34, 1398 (1975);Phys. Rev. C,12, 1205 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Christillin
    • 1
  • M. Rosa-Clot
    • 2
  1. 1.The Niels Bohr InstituteUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.CERNGeneve

Personalised recommendations