Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 454–478 | Cite as

Profiling environmentally responsible consumer-citizens

  • Lewis R. Tucker
  • Ira J. Dolich
  • David Wilson


This paper examines differences between proven environmentally responsible individuals and the general public on six variables. An experimental choice situation of environmentally responsible decisions was combined with self report measures to test the hypotheses. The generalized social responsibility correlates of internal-external control and social class were proven to be significant univariate as well as multivariate predictors of environmental responsibility. The most significant implication for marketers is that environmentally responsible target markets may be substantial enough to warrant the use of environmentally oriented marketing programs.


Social Responsibility Social Class Behavioral Measure Laundry Detergent Attitudinal Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Almond, G.A. and S. VerbaThe Civic Culture (Princeton University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, W. T. and H. Cunningham “The Socially Conscious Consumer,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 36, (July, 1972) 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berkowtiz, L. “A Laboratory Investigation of Social Class and National Differences in Helping Behavior,”International Journal of Psychology Vol. 1 (1966) 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berkowitz, L. and W. H. Conner, “Succes, Failure and Social Responsibility,”Journal of Personality and Social psychology, Vol. 4, (1966) 664–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berkowitz, L. and L. Daniels “Responsibility and Dependency,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology Vol. 66 (1963) 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berkowitz, L. and P. Friedman “Some Social Class Differences in Helping Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 5, (1967), 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berkowitz, L. and K. G. Lutterman “The Traditional Socially Responsible Personality,”Public Opinion Quarterly Vol. 32 (1968) 1969–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bilkey, W. J. “A Psychological Approach to Consumer Behavior Analysis,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 18, (July, 1953), 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buttel, F. H. and W. L. Flinn “The Structure of Support for the Environmental Movement, 1908–1970”,Rural Sociology, Vol. 39, (September, 1974) 56–59.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    1970 Census of the Population “General Population Characteristics: Pennsylvania,” U.S. Department of Commerce, Burau of the Census, 1973.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Constantini, E. and K. Hanf “Environmental Concern and Lake Tahoe: A Study of Elite Perceptions, Backgrounds and Attitudes,”Environment and Behavior, 4, New York, Free Press, 1969, 209–242.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dixon, W. J.BMD: Biomedical Computer Programs Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dubin, R., Theory Building.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dunlap, R. E. and R. B. Heffernan, “Outdoor Recreation and Environmental Concern: A Empirical Investigation,”Rural Sociology, Vol. 40 (Spring, 1975), 18–30.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dunlap, R. E. “Impact of Policital Orientation of Environmental Attitudes and Actions,”Environment and Behavior, Vol. 7 (December, 1975) 428–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    “Earth Day Is No Longer A Street Scene,”Chemical Week, 116 (April 23, 1975) 37–39.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Engel, J.F., D.T. Kollat, and R.D. BlackwellConsumer Behavior, (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Enis, B. M., “Deepening the Concept of Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 37 (October, 1973) 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fisk, G.,Marketing and The Ecological Crisis, (New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, 1974).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gore, P. and J. B. Rotter “A Personality Correlate of Social Action,”Journal of Personality, Vol. 31 (1963) 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gough, H. G., H. McCloskey and P. E. Meehl “A Personality Scale for Social Responsibility,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 47, (1952) 3–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grossman, G. M. and H. R. Potter, “Trend Analysis of Competing Models of Environmental Concern” Paper presented at the 1977 Annual Meeting of the North Central Sociological Association, Pittsburgh 1977.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harris, D. B. “A Scale for Measuring Attitudes of Social Responsibility in Children,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 55, (1957), 322–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harry, J., R. Gale and J. Hendee “Conservation: An Upper-Middle Class Social Movement,”Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 3 (1969) 246–254.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heberlein, J. A. and J. S. Black, “The Land Ethic in Action: Personal Norms Beliefs and the Purchase of Lead Free Gasolilne,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociological Society, Montreal, Canada 1974.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hendee, J. C., W. R. Catton, Jr., L. D. Marlow, and C. F. Brockman, “Wilderness Users in the Pacific Northwest—their characteristics, Values and Management Preferences,” USDA Forest Service Research Paper PNW—61, Portland, Oregon, 1968.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Henion, K. E., “The Effect of Ecological Relevant Information on Detergent Sales,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 9, (February, 1972) 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hill, Gladwin, H. “Ecologists Fear Peril To Nature,”New York Times, June 8, 1975) 35.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hollingshead, A. B. and F. C. Redlich,Social Class and Mental Illness, New York: John Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hornstein, H. A. “Social Models and Interpersonal Helping,” in J. Macaulay and L. Berkowitz (eds.),Altruism and Helping Behavior, New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hornstein, H. A., E. Fisch and M. Homlmes, “The Influence of a Model's Feelings About His Behavior and His Relevance as a Comparison of Other on an Observer's Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 10, (1968) 222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jacoby, J. “Towards Defining Consumer Psychology: One Psychologist's Views,” Paper presented at the American Psychological Association 77th Annual Convention, Washington, D.C., 1969.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kinnear, T. and J.R. Taylor “The Effect of Ecological Concern on Brand Perceptions,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol 10, (May, 1973) 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kinnear, T., J. R. Taylor and S. Ahmed, “Ecological Concerned Consumers: Who Are They?”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38, (April, 1973) 2–24.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Koenic, D. J. “Additional Research on Environmental Activism,”Environment and Behavior, Vol. 7, (December, 1975) 472–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Krebs, D. L. “Altruism: An Examination of the Concept and a Review of the Literature,”Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 73, (1959) 258–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Krech, D., R. S. Crutchfield and E. L. Ballachey,Individual in Society (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1962).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kruskal, W. H. and L. A. Goodman “Measures of Association for Cross Classifications,”Journal of American Statistical Society, 49, (1954) 723–64.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    London, P. and B. M. Hemphill, “The Motivations of Blood Donors,”Transfusion, Vol. 5, (1965)559–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    McGrath, P. S. Managing Corporate External Relations: Changing Perspectives Report No. 679 (New York: The Conference Board, 1976).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Maloney, M. P. and M. P. Ward “Ecology: Lets Hear From the People—An Objective Scale for the Measurement of Ecological Attitudes and Knowledge,”American Pychologists, Vol. 28, (July, 1973) 583–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mildarsky, E. “Aiding Responses: An Analysis and Review,”Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, Vol. 14 (1968) 229–260.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mildarsky E., “Some Antecedents of Aiding Under Stress,”Proceedings of 76th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association Vol. 3 (1968b) 385–386.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mildarsky, E. and J. Bryan, “Training Charity in Children,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 5, (1967), 408–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Morrison, D. J. “On the Interpretation of Discriminant Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research Vol. 11, May, 1969, 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Muir, D. and E. Weinstein, “The Social Debt: An Investigation of Lower Class and Middle Class Norms of Social Obligation,”American Sociological Review, Vol. 27, (1962) 532–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Meyers, J. H., “Finding Determinant Buying Attitudes,”Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 35, (1971) 102–108.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Novic, K. and P. M. Sandman “How Use of Mass Media Affects Views on Solutions to Environmental Problems,”Journalism Quarterly, Vol. 51 (1974) 622–630.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Outdoor Recreation Resources Review CommissionOutdoor Recreation for America—The Report of the Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission to President and the Congress, Vol. 1–27, 1962.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Peters, W. H., “Who Cooperates In Voluntary Recycling Efforts?”American Marketing Association Combined Conference Proceedings, AMA: Chicago Spring & Fall, 1973, 505–508.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rotter, J. B., “Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcements,”Psychological Monographs, Vol. 80, (1966) (1, Whole No. 609).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sawyer, J., “The Altruism Scale: A Measure of Cooperative, Individualistic, and Competitive Interpersonal Orientation,”American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 71, (1966) 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shimkunas, A. and R. G. Kime, “Personality Correlates of Student Commitment to Social Action,”Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 35, (1972) 561–568.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Stallings, R. A., “Patterns of Belief in Social Movements: Clarification from an Analysis of Environmental Groups,”Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 14, (1973) 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Strickland, B., “The Prediction of Social Action From a Dimension of Internal-External Control,”Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 66, (1965) 353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tognacci, L. N., R. H. Weigel, M. F. Wideen, and D. T. A. Vernon, “Environmental Quality: How Universal is Public Concern,”Environment and Behavior, Vol. 4, (1972), 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tomeh, A. K., “Formal Voluntary Organizations: Participation, Correlates and Interrelationships,”Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 43, (1973) 89–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Webster, F., Jr., “Determining the Characteristics of the Socially Conscious Consumer,”Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 2, (December, 1975) 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Winters, L. C., “Measuring Attitudes and Behaviors Toward Ecologically Significant Products,”Psychological Reports, Vol. 29, (1971) 893–894.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lewis R. Tucker
    • 1
  • Ira J. Dolich
    • 2
  • David Wilson
    • 3
  1. 1.University of ConnecticutUSA
  2. 2.University of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  3. 3.Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations