Advertisement

Journal of Genetics

, Volume 85, Issue 1, pp 25–30 | Cite as

Introgressive hybridization and evolution of a novel protein phenotype: Glue protein profiles in thenasuta-albomicans complex ofDrosophila

  • S. Aruna
  • H. A. Ranganath
Research Article

Abstract

Glue proteins are tissue-specific proteins synthesized by larval salivary gland cells ofDrosophila. InDrosophila nasuta nasuta andD. n. albomicans of thenasuta subgroup, the genes that encode the major glue protein fractions are X-linked. In the present study, these X-linked markers have been employed to trace the pattern of introgression ofD. n. nasuta andD. n. albomicans genomes with respect to the major glue protein fractions in their interracial hybrids, called cytoraces. These cytoraces have inherited the chromosomes of both parents and have been maintained in the laboratory for over 400–550 generations. The analysis has revealed that cytoraces withD. n. albomicans X chromosome show eitherD. n. nasuta pattern or a completely novel pattern of glue protein fractions. Further, quantitative analysis also shows lack of correlation between the chromosomal pattern of inheritance and overall quantity of the major glue protein fractions in the cytoraces. Thus, in cytoraces the parental chromosomes are not just differentially represented but there is evidence for introgression even at the gene level.

Keywords

hybridization introgression glue proteins novel proteins Drosophila 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aruna S. and Ranganath H. A. 2004 Isozymes and genetic divergence in thenasuta-albomicans complex ofDrosophila.Curr. Sci. 86, 1017–1023.Google Scholar
  2. Avise C. 1994Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Barton N. H. and Gale K. S. 1993 Genetic analysis of hybrid zones. InHybrid zones and the evolutionary process (ed. R. G. Harrison), pp. 13–45. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Harini B. P. and Ramachandra N. B. 1999a Does evolution reduce the body size? A study of the four members of newly evolvednasuta-albomicans complex ofDrosophila.Genetica 105, 1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harini B. P. and Ramachandra N. B. 1999b Racial divergence in sternopleural bristles among parental races and the newly evolved Cytoraces 1 and 2 of thenasuta-albomicans complex ofDrosophila.Curr. Sci. 76, 1017–1019.Google Scholar
  6. Harini B. P. and Ramachandra N. B. 2000 Racial divergence in body weight: a study of the four members of newly evolvednasuta-albomicans complex ofDrosophila.Curr. Sci. 78, 342–344.Google Scholar
  7. Korge G. 1977 Larval saliva inDrosophila melanogaster: production, composition and relationship to chromosome puffs.Dev. Biol. 58, 339–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kumar S., Tamura K., Jakobsen I. B. and Nei M. 2001 MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software.Bioinformatics 17, 1244–1245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Laemmli U. K. 1970 Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.Nature 227, 680–685.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lane N. I., Carter Y. R. and Ashburner M. 1972 Puffs and salivary gland function: the fine structure of the larval and prepupal salivary glands ofDrosophila melanogaster.Wilhelm Roux Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Org. 169, 216–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lehmann M. 1996Drosophila Sgs genes: stage and tissue specificity of hormone responsiveness.Bioessays 18, 47–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ramachandra N. B. and Ranganath H. A. 1986 The chromosomes of two racesDrosophila nasuta nasuta, Drosophila nasuta albomicana: TV. Hybridization karyotype repatterning.Chromosoma 93, 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ramachandra N. B. and Ranganath H. A. 1988 Estimation of population fitness of parental races (Drosophila nasuta nasuta, Drosophila nasuta albomicana) and of the newly evolved Cytoraces (I and II)—the products of parental interracial hybridization.Genome 30, 58–62.Google Scholar
  14. Ramachandra N. B. and Ranganath H. A. 1990 The chromosomes of twoDrosophila races:Drosophila nasuta nasuta, Drosophila nasuta albomicana: V. Introgression and the evolution of new karyotypes.Z Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch. 28, 62–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ramesh S. R. and Kaiisch W.-E. 1988 Comparative study of glue protein in theDrosophila nasuta subgroup.Biochem. Genet. 26, 527–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramesh S. R. and Kalisch W.-E. 1989a Taxonomic identification ofDrosophila nasuta subgroup strains by glue protein analysis.Genetica 78, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramesh S. R. and Kalisch W.-E. 1989b Comparative analysis of glue proteins inDrosophila nasuta subgroup.Biochem. Genet. 27, 507–519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ranganath H. A. 2002 Evolutionary biology ofDrosophila nasuta andDrosophila albomicans.Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. B68, 255–272.Google Scholar
  19. Ranganath H. A. and Aruna S. 2003 Hybridization, transgressive segregation and evolution of new genetic systems inDrosophila.J. Genet. 82, 163–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ravi Ram K. and Ramesh S. R. 2002 Synthesis of male accessory gland secretory proteins corresponds to gene dose: a study with the hybrids ofDrosophila nasuta subgroup.Entomon 27, 231–237.Google Scholar
  21. Riddiford L. M. 1993 Hormones andDrosophila development. InThe development of Drosophila melanogaster (ed. M. Bate and A. M. Arias), vol. 2, pp. 899–939. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.Google Scholar
  22. Strickberger M. W. 1985Genetics, 3rd edition. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Tanuja M. T., Ramachandra N. B. and Ranganath H. A. 1999a Evolution of a recent neo-Y sex chromosome in a laboratory population ofDrosophila.J. Genet. 78, 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tanuja M. T., Ramachandra N. B. and Ranganath H. A. 1999b Evolution of a new chromosomal lineage in a laboratory population ofDrosophila through centric fission.J. Biosci. 24, 421–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tanuja M. T., Ramachandra N. B. and Ranganath H. A. 2001a Incipient sexual isolation in thenasuta-albomicans complex ofDrosophila: no-choice experiments.J. Biosci. 26, 71–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tanuja M. T., Ramachandra N. B. and Ranganath H. A. 2001b Incipient sexual isolation in thenasuta-albomicans complex ofDrosophila: Mating preference in male-, female- and multiple-choice mating experiments.J. Biosci. 26, 365–371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Woodruff D. S. 1989 Genetic anomalies associated withCerion hybrid zones: the origin and maintenance of the new electromorphic variants called hybrizymes.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 36, 281–294.Google Scholar
  28. Zajonz M., Ramesh S. R. and Kalisch W.-E. 1996 Deglycosylation of larval secretion protein fractions in theDrosophila nasuta subgroup.Dros. Inf. Serv. 77, 76–78.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Drosophila Stock Center, Department of Studies in ZoologyUniversity of Mysore, ManasagangotriMysoreIndia

Personalised recommendations