Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 73–82 | Cite as

Defining roles for logistics during routine and radical technological innovation

  • Patricia W. Meyers
  • Frances Gaither Tucker
Special Section


Technological innovation has become increasingly important to new product development in American industry because of the potential competitive advantage it offers. In this study extensive observation and interviewing over more than two years in one prominent Frtune 500 industrial manufacturer provides strong evidence that logistics can and does play important—and sometimes surprising—roles in the development and launch of new technological products. This article describes logistics activities during the development and launch of technological innovations, identifies key roles played by logistics, relates lessons learned and proposes directions for future research.


Product Development Technological Innovation Spare Part Radical Innovation Logistics Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abemathy, William J. and James M. Utterback. 1978. “Patterns of Industrial Innovation.”Technology Review 80 (June/July): 41–47.Google Scholar
  2. Ansoff, H. Igor. 1957. “Strategies for Diversification.”Harward Business Review (September/October): 113–124.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, Michael, ed. 1976.Marketing in Adversity. London: The MacMillan Press, Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Bonoma, Thomas V. 1985. “Case Research in Marketing: Opportunities, Problems, and a Process.”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (May): 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowersox, Donald J., David J. Closs, and Omar K. Helferich. 1986.Logistical Management. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  6. Brinberg, David and Elizabeth C. Hirschman. 1986. “Multiple Orientations for the Conduct of Marketing Research: An Analysis of the Academic/Practitioner Distinction.”Journal of Marketing 50 (October): 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgelman, Robert A. 1985. “Managing the New Venture Dision: Research Findings and Implications for Strategic Management.”Strategic Management Journal 6:1 (Jan./Mar.): 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burns, T. and G. M. Stalker. 1961.The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  9. Calder, Bobby J.. 1977. “Focus Groups and the Nature of Qualitative Marketing Research.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (August): 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, Donald T.. 1975. “Degrees of Freedom and the Case Study.”Comparative Political Studies 8, 179–193.Google Scholar
  11. Capon, Noel and Rashi Glazer. 1987. “Marketing and Technology: A Strategic Coalignment.”Journal of Marketing 51: 3 (July): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cavinato, Joseph. 1987. “Product Life Cycle: Logistics Rides the Roller Coaster.”Distribution (September): 12–19.Google Scholar
  13. Crawford, C. Merle. 1987. “New Products Management, 2nd ed., Homewood, Ill: Irwin.Google Scholar
  14. Dewar, Robert D. and Jane E. Dutton. 1986. “The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Emperical Analysis.”Management Science 32: 11 (Nov.): 1422–1433.Google Scholar
  15. Drucker, Peter F. 1985.Innovation and Entrepreneurship Practice and Principles. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  16. Duncan, R.. 1976. “The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation.” in R.H. Kilmann, L.R. Pondy, and D.P. Sleving (eds.),The Management of Organization Design. New York: North-Holland 1: 167–188.Google Scholar
  17. Ettlie, J.E., W.P. Bridges, and R.D. O’Keefe. 1984. “Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical vs. Incremental Innovation.”Management Science 30: 682–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ford, David and Chris Ryan. 1977. “The Marketing of Technology”.European Journal of Marketing 11: 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. —. 1981. “Taking Technology to Market.”Harvard Business Review 59 (March–April): 117–126.Google Scholar
  20. Foster, Richard. 1986.Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage. New York: Summit Books/Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  21. Foxall, Gordon R.. 1984.Corporate Innovation: Marketing and Strategy. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  22. Freeman, Christopher. 1974.The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  23. Gerwin, D.. 1981. “Relationships between Structure and Technology.” In P.C. Nystrom and W.H. Starbuck, eds.,Handbook of Organizational Design: Vol. 2,Remodeling Organizations and Their Environments. New York: Oxford University Press: 3–38.Google Scholar
  24. Grossman, Joel B. 1970. “The Supreme Court and Social Change.”American Behavioral Scientist 13: 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gupta, Ashok K., S.P. Raj, and David L. Wilemon. 1986. “A Model for Studying the R&D Marketing Interface in the Product Innovation Process.”Journal of Marketing 50: 2 (April): 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hage, Jerald and M. Aiken. 1967. “Program Change and Organizational Properties: A Comparative Analysis.”American Journal of Sociology 72:503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayes, Robert H. and William J. Abemathy. 1980. “Managing Our Way to Economic Decline.”Harvard Business Review 58: 4 (July/August): 67–77.Google Scholar
  28. Kolter, Philip, Liam Fahey, and S. Jatusripitak. 1985. “The New Competition: What Theory Z Didn’t Tell You about Marketing. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Nord, Walter R. and Sharon Tucker. 1987.Implementing Routine and Radical innovations. Lexington, Mass: Lexington/D.C. HeathGoogle Scholar
  30. Normann, R.. 1971 “Organizational Innovativeness: Product Variation and Reorientation.”Administrative Science Quarterly 16: 2. 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pessemier, Edgar A. 1977.Product Management: Strategy and Organization. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Porter, Michael E. 1985:Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  33. Roberts, Edward B. 1980. “New Ventures for Corporate Growth.”Harvard Business Review 80 (July–August): 134–142.Google Scholar
  34. Robertson, Thomas S. 1971.Innovative Behavior and Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  35. Rogers, Everett M., 1983:Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd. ed., New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rothwell, Roy, C. Freeman, A. Horsley, V.T.P. Jervis, A.B. Robertson, and J. Townsend. 1974. “SAPPHO Updated—Project SAPPHO Phase II.”Research Policy 3: 258–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shanklin, William L. and John K. Ryans, Jr. 1984.Marketing High Technology. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books/D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  38. Souder, William E. 1987.Managing New Product Innovations. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington/D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  39. — and Alok K. Chakrabarti.1980. “Managing the Coordination of Marketing and R&D in the Innovation Process.” in Burton V. Dean and Joel L. Goldhar, eds.,TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences. New York: North Holland 135–150.Google Scholar
  40. Stein, Barry A. and Rosabeth M. Kanter. 1980. “Building the Parallel Organization: Creating Mechanisms for Permanent Quality of Work Life.”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 16:371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Urban, Glen L. and John R. Hauser. 1980.Design and Marketing of New Products. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  42. von Hipple, Eric. 1978 “Successful Industrial Products from Customer Ideas.”Journal of Marketing 42: 1 (January).: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zaltman, Gerald, Robert Duncan and Jonny Holbek. 1973.Innovations and Organizations, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. —, Christian R.A. Pinson, and Reinhard Angelmar. 1973.Metatheory and Consumer Research, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  45. —, Karen LeMasters, and Michael Heffring., 1982.Theory Construction in Marketing. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia W. Meyers
    • 1
  • Frances Gaither Tucker
    • 1
  1. 1.Syracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations