The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 71, Issue 1, pp 15–18 | Cite as

Heterophile antibody positive infectious mononucleosis

  • Baijayantimala Mishra
  • Balvinder Mohan
  • R. K. Ratho
Original Article


Objective: The present study has been carried out to analyse the trend of heterophile antibody positive infectious mononucleosis cases.Methods: A total of 1741 cases of clinically suspected infectious mononucleosis from various age groups were investigated during the period January, 1986 to December, 2000 and were analysed for infectious mononucleosis (IM) specific heterophile antibody by Paul-Bunnel-Davidsohn (PBD) test. Forty seven heterophile antibody negative samples were also tested simultaneously for the presence of the IgG antibody to viral capsid antigen (VCA) and Epstein Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA) to detect the exposure to Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) infection.Results : The overall percentage of EBV specific heterophile (Paul-Bunnel) antibody positivity was found to be 11.1 % (194/1741). The average Paul-Bunnel antibody positivity between 1986 to 1990 was 20.5% which declined drastically to 5.7% during 1991-2000. Males comprised of 55.2% of the serologically proven IM cases. Of the 47 heterophile antibody negative cases, 38 (80.9%) and 33 (70.2%) were found to be positive for anti-VCA IgG and anti-EBNA IgG antibodies respectively. Paul Bunnel antibody positivity was found to be higher in > 14 year5 age group patients than those below 14 years.Conclusion : These findings suggest that the EBV infection still continues to be endemic in this part of the country, however, a declining trend in IM cases was observed during the last decade.

Key words

Infectious mononucleosis Heterophile antibody Epstein Barr Virus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chesseman SH. Infectious mononucleosis.Semin Hematol 1998; 25:261–268.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Linde AJ. Diagnosis and pathogenesis of infectious mononucleosis and other Epstein Barr virus-associated disease.Reu Med Microbiol 1992; 3: 43–51.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wiedbrauk DL, Bassin S. Evaluation of five enzyme immunoassays for detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus viral capsid antigens.J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31:1339–1341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jenson HB. Epstein-Barr virus. Nelson WE, ed.Nelson textbook of Pediatrics. 15th edn, Philadelphia; W.B. Saunders Company, 1996; 897–900.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Latif ZA, Fletcher MA. Immunochemical studies of infectious mononucleosis. XI. Comparison of heterophile antibody inhibitors from the erythrocyte membranes of four mammalian species.Mol Immunol 1983; 20:1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davidsohn I, Lee CL. Serologic diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis.Am J Clin Path 1964; 41: 115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    John TJ. Seroepidemiology of Herpes virus in Vellore.Virus Information Exchange News Letter for South East Asia and the Western Pacific 1984; 1: 36.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pal SR, Choudhury S, Kulkarni S and Das KC. Paul-Bunnell antibody positive infectious mononucleosis cases.Indian J Med Res 1981; 74: 332–336.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Naleshik MA. Epstein-Barr virus. Lennette EH, ed.Laboratory Diagnosis of Viral Infection. 3rd edn, New York; Marcel Dekker Inc., 1999; 385–408.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buescher EL. Miscellaneous viral diseases. Lenette EH, Schmidt JA, ed.Diagnostic Procedures for Viral and Rickettsial Diseases. 3rd ed. American Public Health Association, New York, 1964; 734.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evans AS, Paul JR. Infectious mononucleosis. Horsfall FL, Jr. and Tamm I, eds.Viral and Rickettsial Disease Infection of Man. 4th edition, Philadelphia; J.B. Lippincott Company, 1966: 998–99.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rickinson AB. Epstein-Barr Virus. David MK, ed.Fields Virology. Vol. 2, 4th edition, Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2001; 2575–2628.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maeda M, Sairenjo T, Hinuma Y. Reactivity of Paul-Bunnel type heterophile antibody in sera from infectious mononucleosis patients with the surface of lymphoid cells carrying Epstein-Barr virus genomes.Microbiol Immunol 1979; 23:1189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Godshall SE, Kirchner JT. Infectious mononucleosis: complexities of a common syndrome.Postgrad Med 2000; 107: 175–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Evans AS. Infectious mononucleosis. Observations from a public health laboratory.Yale J Biol Med 1961–1962; 34:261–276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dunnet WN. Infectious mononucleosis.Br Med J 1963; 1: 1187–1191.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Henke CE, Kurland LT, Elveback LR. Infectious mononucleosis in Rochester, Minnesota, 1960 through 1969.Am J Epidemiol 1973; 98(6): 483–490.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baijayantimala Mishra
    • 1
  • Balvinder Mohan
    • 1
  • R. K. Ratho
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of VirologyPGIMERChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations