Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 89–96 | Cite as

General tests of theΔI=1/2 andΔS=ΔQ rules in Kl3 decays

  • J. H. Field


A complete phenomenological description of Kl3 decays (relative decay rates, angular distributions, momentum spectra and polarizations) can be given in terms of 5 « reduced » form factor ratiosξ0,y ± 0 ,x ± 0 with respective isospin transformation propertiesI,I3=1/2, 1/2; 3/2, 1/2; 3/2, 3/2. Shortcomings of the well-known tests of the ΔI=1/2 rule for Kl3 decays are discussed, and a general test of the formy ± 0 =x ± 0 =0 is proposed. A method is described of extracting the reduced form factor ratios from experimental data. A relation betweeny ± 0 andx ± 0 is given for the case in which theI=3/2 currents have definiteSU3 transformation properties.

Обшая проверка правил ΔI = 1/2 и ΔS = ΔQ в К?3 распадах


Полное феноменологическое описание Кt3 распадов (относительные интенсивности распадов, угловые распределения, импульсные спектры и поляриэации) может быть дано в терминах 5 отнощений «приведенных» форм-факторов ξ0,y ± 0 ,x ± 0 с соответствуюшими свойствами иэоспиновых преобраэованийI,I3 =1/2, 1/2; 3/2, 1/2; 3/2, 3/2. Обсуждаются недостатки хорощо иэвестных проверок правила ΔI = 1/2 Для Кt3 распадов и предлагается обшая проверка формыу ± 0 =x ± 0 =0. Описывается метод иэвлечения отнощений приведенных форм-факторов иэ зкспериментальных данных. Приводится соотнощение междуу ± 0 иу ± 0 для случая, в котором токиI = 3/2 имеют определенные свойстваSU3 преобраэований.


Si può dare una descrizione fenomenologica completa del decadimento Kl3 (rapporti di decadimento relativi, spettri degli impulsi e polarizzazioni) in termini di 5 rapporti « ridotti » dei fattori di formaξ0,y ± 0 ,x ± 0 con le rispettive proprietà di trasformazione di isospinI,I3=1/2, 1/2; 3/2, 1/2; 3/2, 3/2: Si discutono alcuni aspetti non soddisfacenti delle ben note verifiche della regola ΔI=1/2 per il decadimento Kl3, e si propone una verifica generale della formay ± 0 =x ± 0 =0. Si descrive un metodo per estrarre i rapporti ridotti dei fattori di forma dai dati sperimentali. Si dà una relazione fray ± 0 ex ± 0 per il caso in cui le correntiI=3/2 hanno ben definite proprietà di trasformazione secondoSU3.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Seee.g. T. D. Lee andC. S. Wu:Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci.,16, 483 (1966).Google Scholar
  2. (3).
    Reference (1), p. 572.Google Scholar
  3. (4).
    J. H. Field:Nuovo Cimento,64 A, 184 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. (5).
    As in ref. (4) we define |K L0〉∼(|K 0〉−|K- 0〉)/√2 and assume |x +,−|≫|ɛ|, whereɛ is the conventionalCP-violation parameter.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. (6).
    The corresponding ratioR μ forπμν decays gives no additional information as it is related toR e,ξ(KL0),ξ(K+) by a relation of the formR e/C e=(R μ/C μF(ξ(KL0),ξ(K+)), whereF is a known kinematical function. See, for example,B. G. Kenney:Phys. Rev. Lett.,20, 1217 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. (7).
    E. S. Ginsberg:Phys. Rev.,142, 1035 (1966);162, 1570 (1967);171, 1675 (1968);174, 2169 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. (8).
    G. Benfatto, F. Nicolò andC. Rossi:Nuovo Cimento,62 A, 631 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. (9).
    C. Rubbia:Proceedings of the CERN Topical Conference on Weak Interactions (Geneva, 1969), p. 250.Google Scholar
  9. (10).
    J. H. Field:Nuovo Cimento,61 A, 532 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. (11).
    N. Cabibbo andA. Maksymowicz:Phys. Lett.,9, 352 (1964);11, 360 (1964);14, 72 (1965).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. (12).
    For a summary of the experimental situation forξ(KL0),ξ(K+),R e,R μ see the review article byRubbia ref. (9) above.Google Scholar
  12. (13).
    N ±(τ), the proper time spectra for Kl3 decays into ℓ± are given in ref. (10) above.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. (14).
    As can be seen by comparing equations (2) and (4) such cancellations can also occur for K+π 0μ+ ν decays if bothy +0,y 0 have nonzero imaginary parts. See eqs. (2) and (3) of ref. (4) above withx +y +0,x y 0.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. (15).
    T. D. Lee andC. S. Wu:Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci.,15, 400 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (16).
    N. Cabibbo:Phys. Rev. Lett.,10, 531 (1963).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. (17).
    See ref. (4–9) of ref. (10) above.Google Scholar
  17. (18).
    S. Bennett, D. Nygren, H. Saal, J. Sunderland, J. Steinberger andK. Kleinknecht:Phys. Lett.,27 B, 244 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. (19).
    L. S. Littenberg, J. H. Field, O. Piccioni, W. A. W. Mehlhop, S. S. Murty, P. H.^Bowles andT. H. Burnett:Phys. Rev. Lett.,22, 654 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. (21).
    J. J. De Swart:Rev. Mod. Phys.,35, 916 (1963).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. (22).
    In a similar way one can show that the symmetric (D-type) octet current matrix element 〈8|8s|8〉 is purely imaginary, fromCPT invariance. IfCP invariance is assumed this matrix element must vanish. The octet current is then purely antisymmetric (F-type). This latter current corresponds to the usual Cabibbo octet current. Seee.g. S. Gasiorowicz:Elementary Particle Physics (New York, 1966), p. 586.Google Scholar
  21. (23).
    N. Barash-Schmidt, A. Barbaro Galtieri, C. Bricman, S. E. Derenzo, L. R. Price, A. Rittenberg, M. Roos, A. H. Rosenfeld, P. Söding andC. G. Wohl:Rev. Mod. Phys.,42, 194 (1970).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Field
    • 1
  1. 1.Rutherford High Energy LaboratoryChilton nr. Didcot

Personalised recommendations