Advertisement

Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 804–813 | Cite as

Remarks on the strong asymptotic decrease of form factors

  • A. P. Balachandran
Article

Summary

Wu and Yang have recently suggested on the basis of statistical considerations that the nucleon electromagnetic form factorF(t) (which may be either electric or magnetic) should decrease like exp [−c|t|1/2],c>0 when the square of the invariant momentum transfert tends to infinity. They have also shown that this behaviour is consistent with the experimental data onF(t) for large spacelike momentum transfers. We prove that if i)F(t) decreases faster than any inverse power oft whent→−∞, and ii) ImF(t)=O (exp [−c|t|1/2]),c>0 whent→+∞, thenF(t) is uniquely determined by the subtraction functionG(t) associated with its dispersion relation and that this function must be an entire function of nonzero order. It is also shown thatF(t) must increase faster than any power oft whent→∞ along some real or complex direction. The spectral function forF(t) is explicitly exhibited as the Fourier transform of an analytic function which is defined by a power series in a certain domain of its regularity. The power series involves only quantities which are determined byG(t). Unitarity is not used in the proof so that the unitary structure ofF(t) and hence the mass spectrum in thet-channel must be consequences of the properties ofG(t) and of the assumed asymptotic behaviour ofF(t).

Keywords

Form Factor Spectral Function Moment Problem Inverse Power Sulla Base 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Riassunto

Wu e Yang hanno recentemente suggerito sulla base di considerazioni statistiche che il fattore di forma elettromagnetico del nucleoneF(t) (che può essere elettrico o magnetico) dovrebbe decrescere come exp [−c|t|1/2],c>0 quando il quadrato del momento trasferito invariantet tende all’infinito. Essi hanno anche dimostrato che questo comportamento concorda con i dati sperimentali perF(t) per grandi momenti spaziali trasferiti. Si dimostra che se i)F(t) decrease più rapidamente di ogni potenza inversa dit quandot→−∞, e se ii) ImF(t)=O(exp[−ct1/2]),c>0 quandot→+∞, alloraF(t) è determinata unicamente dalla funzione di sottrazioneG(t) associata con la sua relazione di dispersione e che questa funzione deve essere una funzione interna di ordine non nullo. Si dimostra anche cheF(t) deve decrescere più rapidamente di ogni potenza dit quandot→∞ lungo qualche direzione reale o complessa. Si scrive esplicitamente la funzione spettrale diF(t) come trasformata di Fourier di una funzione analitica definita da una serie di potenze in un certo dominio della sua regolarità. La serie di potenze coinvolge solo quantità che sono determinate daG(t). Nella dimostrazione non si fa uso dell’unitarietà cosicchè la struttura unitaria diF(t) e quindi lo spettro di massa nel canalet devono essere conseguenze delle proprietà diG(t) e dell’ammesso comportamento asintotico diF(t).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    C. N. Yang andT. T. Wu: preprint (Brookhaven, 1964).Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    K. W. Chen, A. A. Cone, J. R. Dunning jr.,S. F. G. Frank, N. F. Ramsey J. K. Walker andR. Wilson:Phys. Rev. Lett.,11, 561 (1963);J. R. Dunning jr.,K. W. Chen, A. A. Cone, G. Hartwig, N. F. Ramsey, J. K. Walker andR. Wilson:Phys. Rev. Lett.,13, 631 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    A. Martin: preprint (CERN, 1964). Note, however, that Martin assumes thatF(t)=O [exp [c|t|1/2]],c>0 whent→∞ along any ray. This is incompatible with our assumptions [except possibly in the case mentioned in footnote (14)] as the result β) implies thatG(t) and henceF(t) increases at least like exp [c|t|] whent→∞ in some fashion.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    J. Orear:Phys. Rev. Lett.,12, 112 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Hereafter, limits of the forms→±∞ ort→±∞ are to be understood as being taken with these variables tending to ∞ along the real line.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    F. Cerulus andA. Martin:Phys. Lett.,8, 80 (1964).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    G. Fast andR. Hagedorn:Nuovo Cimento,27, 208 (1963);R. Hagedorn: preprint (CERN, 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    A. P. Balachandran:Phys. Rev.,137, B 177 (1965). Note that the proof given here can also be carried through with the assumptions that ImF(s, z) isO(exp [−c(θ)s 1/2]),c(θ)>0 and ReF(s,z) decreases faster than any inverse power ofs whens→+∞. The minimal hypothesis ofKinoshita (9) perhaps corresponds to the situation where ImF(s, z)∼A exp [−c(θ)s 1/2] and ReF(s, z) decreases faster than any inverse power ofs whens→+∞ and not to the situation whereF(s, z)∼A exp [−c(θ)s 1/2] as suggested in this paper.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    T. Kinoshita:Phys. Rev. Lett.,12, 256 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    A. P. Balachandran: preprint (Syracuse University, 1965) andAnn. of Phys.35, 209 (1965). This is also the case if ηi(s)→1 and the real phase shift δ1(s)→nπ sufficiently fast whens→+∞ wheren is an integer. We consider this behaviour unlikely as it implies the vanishing of absorption at high energies.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    The theorem which states that the solution of the moment problem (2.11) which satisfies the boundary condition (2.14) is unique apart from sets of zero measure is due toLe Roy andHardy. SeeE. Le Roy:Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de Toulose, (2),2, 317 (1900);G. H. Hardy:Messenger of Mathematics,47, 81 (1917). The proof we present here is due toTitchmarsh (12). Note that precisely the same proof has also been used in ref. (8,10).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    E. C. Titchmarsh:Introduction to the Theory of Fourier Integrals (London, 1948), p. 320.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    E. C. Titchmarsh:Introduction to the Theory of Fourier Integrals (London, 1948), theorem 101, p. 132.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    ProfessorS. W. McDowell has pointed out that there areL p-functions which do not tend to zero whent (orx) increases such that it is always contained in a sequence of intervals [t n,t n+△n] wheret n→+∞ and △n→0 whenn→∞. If ReI(t) is a function of this sort, the limitt→+∞ is to be taken witht avoiding these intervals in the limiting process. It may happen that |G(t)|→∞ exponentially whent→+∞ only ift increases through the sequence of intervals [t n,t n+Δ] while |G(t)| does not have such a fast increase when this limit is taken according to the prescription which makes ReI(t)→0. But, then, there exist circles of radiir n,t n+△n<r n<t n+1, on which |G(t)| acquires a value which is larger than its maximum value in the real interval [t n,t nn] by the maximum modulus theorem. Therefore, there exists an infinite sequence {t n}, argt n≠0 or 2π for any finiten and |t n|∞ whenn→∞, such that whent approaches infinity through this sequence,G(t) approaches infinity exponentially. Then, if argt n+→0 or 2π whenn→∞, the bound (2.26) ensures thatG(t) dominatesF(t) whent=t n andn→∞ andF(t) also increases exponentially. We are unable to demonstrate the exponential increase ofF(t), however, for the case argt n→0 or 2π. This exceptional case has been ignored in the statement of the asymptotic properties ofF(t) in the body of the paper. None of the other conclusions will of course be affected even if this exception turns out to physically be true.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    J. A. Shohat andJ. D. Tamarkin:The problem of Moments (Providence, R. I., 1963), p. 28.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    Reference (15),J. A. Shohat andJ. D. Tamarkin:The problem of Moments (Providence, R. I., 1963), p. 22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. P. Balachandran
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentSyracuse UniversitySyracuse

Personalised recommendations