Journal of Coatings Technology

, Volume 75, Issue 941, pp 51–57 | Cite as

Detrended fluctuation analysis of UV degradation in a polyurethane coating

  • Mark A. Johnson
  • Paul J. Cote


Changes in the intrinsic structure of paint surfaces resulting from extended UV exposure can significantly alter the appearance of paint due to a breakdown in the resin that binds the pigments and flattening agents. In this study, the coating structure of a solvent-based poly-urethane was analyzed to establish correlations between the intrinsic spatial scaling properties of the coating and UV exposure time. Atomic force microscopy and laser scanning confocal microscopy were employed to map surface structures over a range of scales from 80 nm to 80 εm. The roughness of the polyurethane surface was characterized in terms of scaling exponents using detrended fluctuation analysis to identify long-range, power law relations, and to correct for inhomogeneities in the surface structure. The time-dependence of the roughening process was also determined and correlated with changes in gloss.


Polyurethane Detrended Fluctuation Analysis Paint Surface Atomic Force Microscopy Data Polyurethane Coating 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Sung, L., Nadal, M.E., McKnight, M., Marx, E., and Laurenti, B., “Optical Reflectance of Metallic Coatings: Effect of Aluminum Flake Orientation,”Journal of Coatings Technology,74, No. 932, 43 (2002).Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Hegedus, C.R. and Kloiber, K.A., “Aqueous Acrylic-Polyurethane Hybrid Dispersions and Their Use in Industrial Coatings,”Journal of Coatings Technology,68, No. 860, 39 (1996).Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Pomposo, T., Awamura, D., and Ode, T, “Vertical Profiling, CD Measurements, and 3D Surface Profiling with a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope,”SPIE Proc. Surface Characterization and Testing, 1164 (1989).Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Raghavan, D., VanLandingham, M., Gu, X., and Nguyen, T., “Characterization of Heterogeneous Regions in Polymer Systems Using Tapping Mode and Force Mode Atomic Force Microscopy,”Langmuir, 16, 9448–9459 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Magonov, S.N., Ellings, V., and Whangbo, M.H.,Surf. Sci., 375, L385 (1997).Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Turcotte, D.,Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Korvin, G.,Fractal Models in the Earth Sciences, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Gouyet, T.F., Rosso, M., and Sapoval, B.,Fractals and Disordered Systems, Springer, Berlin, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Barabasi, A.L. and Stanley, H.E.,Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995.MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Meisel, L.V., Scanlon, R.D., Johnson, M.A., and Lanzerotti, Y.D., “Self-Affine Analysis on Curved Reference Surfaces: Self-Affine Fractal Characterization of TNT Fracture Surface,”Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, 1, 727–730 (1999).Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Cote, P.J. and Johnson, M.A., “Self-Affine Scaling Analysis of Coating Structure,”Proc. of the SPIE Visual and Information Processing Conference, 3716, 2–8 (1999).ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Peng, C.K., Buldyrev, S.V., Goldberger, A.L., Havlin, S., Sciortino, F., Simons, M., and Stanley, H.E., “Long-Range Correlations in Nucleotide Sequences,”Nature, 356, 168–171 (1992).PubMedCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Peng, C.K., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., Simons, M., Stanley, H.E., and Goldberger, A.L., “Mosaic Organization of DNA Nucleotides,”Phys. Rev. E, 49, 2, 1685–1688 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    U.S. Department of Defense. “Coating Polyurethane, High Solids. MIL-PRF-85285,” Washington, D.C. (April 30, 1997).Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Crawford, A., Escarsega, J., Kosik, W., Lum, W., Patterson, P., Smith, P., Bishop, A., Cote, P., Johnson, M., and Kendall, G.,Proc. 29th International Waterborne, High-Solids and Powder Coatings Symposium, New Orleans, LA, February 2002.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    U.S. Department of Defense. “Primer Coatings; Epoxy, High-Solids. MIL-PRF-23377H.” Washington, D.C. (September 30, 1999).Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    U.S. Department of Defense. “Chemical Conversion Coatings on Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys. MIL-C-5541,” Washington, D.C. (November 30, 1990).Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    Digital Instruments Corporation, 112 Robin Hill Road, Santa Barbara CA, USA.Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    Lasertec USA Inc., 2001 Gateway Place, Suite 130, San Jose, CA 95110.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Pomposo, T., Awamura, D., and Ode, T., “Vertical Profiling, CD Measurements, and 3D Surface Profiling with a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope,”SPIE Proc., Surface Characterization and Testing, 1164 (1989).Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    Gonzalez, R.C. and Wintz, P.,Digital Image Processing. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Massachusetts, 1987.Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    Johnson, M.A. and Cote, P.J., “Characterization of Metastable Structures in Sputtered Coatings,”Proc. of the Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics Conference, 6, 298–303, (2001).Google Scholar
  23. (23).
    Lum, W.S., Patterson, P.H., and Escarsega, J.A., “Mechanisms of Military Coatings Degradation: Color and Gloss Performance Evaluation,” Army Research Laboratory Technical Report #ARL-TR-2670 (2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark A. Johnson
    • 1
  • Paul J. Cote
    • 1
  1. 1.Benet LaboratoriesUSA

Personalised recommendations