References
F. S. Crawford andL. R. Price:Phys. Rev. Lett.,16, 333 (1966).
A. H. Rosenfeld, A. Barbaro-Galtieri, W. H. Barkas, P. L. Bastien, J. Kirz andM. Roos: Report UCRL-8030 (August 1965), unpublished.
For instance in the three models proposed byM. Gell-Mann andM. Lévy:Nuovo Cimento,16, 705 (1960), in which eq. (5) is satisfied.
This result is due toK. Kawarabayashi andM. Suzuki:Phys. Rev. Lett.,16, 255 and 384 (1967).
S. L. Adler:Phys. Rev. Lett.,14, 1051 (1965);W. I. Weisberger:Phys. Rev. Lett.,14, 1047 (1965).
R. H. Dalitz andD. G. Sutherland:Nuovo Cimento,37, 1777 (1965).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ademollo, M., Gatto, R. Relation between η→2πγ and η→2γ from current algebra. Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970) 44, 282–284 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02720197
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02720197