Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 251, Issue 3, pp 111–114 | Cite as

Incidence of glove perforation during episiotomy repair

  • B. Arena
  • N. Maffulli
  • I. Vocaturo
  • G. Scognamiglio
Originals

Summary

A total of 416 gloves were tested for punctures after 200 episiotomy repairs. Evidence of perforation was found in 34 (8%) of the gloves used and in only half the cases did the surgeon actually realise that a perforation had occurred. The left index finger and thumb were more often perforated than other parts of the gloves. The implications of the findings, especially as regards spread of infections to surgeons, are discussed.

Key words

Glove perforation Infection Episiotomy repair 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. British Medical Association (1988) HIV and AIDS. Ethical considerations for the medical profession. LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Brough SJ, Hunt TM, Barrie WW (1988) Surgical glove perforations. Br J Surg 75:317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cole WR, Bernard HR (1964) Inadequacies of present methods of surgical skin preparation. Arch Surg 89:215–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cruse PJE, Ford P (1980) The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10 years prospective study of 62939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am 60:27–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dodds RDA, Barker SGE, Morgan NH, Donaldson DR, Thomas MH (1990) Self protection in surgery: the use of double gloves. Br J Surg 77:219–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hussain SA, Latif ABA, Chaudary AA (1988) Risk to surgeons: a survey of accidental injuries during operations. Br J Surg 75:314–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Maffulli N, Capasso G, Testa V (1989) Glove perforation in elective orthopaedic surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 60:565–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Matta H, Thompson AM, Rainey JB (1988) Does wearing two pairs of gloves protect operating theatre staff from skin contamination? Br Med J 297:597–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McCue SF, Berg EW, Saunders EA (1981) Efficacy of double gloving as a barrier to microbial contamination during total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 63A:811–813Google Scholar
  10. Miles AJG, Wastell C, Allen-Mersh TG (1989) Protection for the left index whilst operating on HIV positive patients. Ann Royal Coll Surg Eng 71:225Google Scholar
  11. Miller JM (1982) William Stewart Halsted and the use of the surgical rubber glove. Surgery 64:541–543Google Scholar
  12. Pasquini P, Khan HA, Pileggi D, Paná A, Terzi J, Guzzanti E (1983) Prevalence of hepatitis B markers in Italy. Am J Epidemiol 118:699–709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Public Health Laboratory Report (1980) Acute hepatitis B associated with gynaecological surgery. Lancet I:1–6Google Scholar
  14. Smith JR, Grant JM (1990) The incidence of glove puncture during caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol 10:317–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vaquero Martin FJ, Martinez Moreno JL (1986) Roturas inadvertidas del guante de goma en cirugia del aparato locomotor. Rev Ortop Traum 30 IB:367–370Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Arena
    • 1
  • N. Maffulli
    • 2
  • I. Vocaturo
    • 3
  • G. Scognamiglio
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology King’s DriveEastbourne District General HospitalEastbourne
  2. 2.Newham General HospitalLondonUK
  3. 3.NapoliItaly
  4. 4.Second Medical School, Institute of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity “Federico II”NapoliItaly

Personalised recommendations