Incidence of glove perforation during episiotomy repair
A total of 416 gloves were tested for punctures after 200 episiotomy repairs. Evidence of perforation was found in 34 (8%) of the gloves used and in only half the cases did the surgeon actually realise that a perforation had occurred. The left index finger and thumb were more often perforated than other parts of the gloves. The implications of the findings, especially as regards spread of infections to surgeons, are discussed.
Key wordsGlove perforation Infection Episiotomy repair
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- British Medical Association (1988) HIV and AIDS. Ethical considerations for the medical profession. LondonGoogle Scholar
- McCue SF, Berg EW, Saunders EA (1981) Efficacy of double gloving as a barrier to microbial contamination during total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 63A:811–813Google Scholar
- Miles AJG, Wastell C, Allen-Mersh TG (1989) Protection for the left index whilst operating on HIV positive patients. Ann Royal Coll Surg Eng 71:225Google Scholar
- Miller JM (1982) William Stewart Halsted and the use of the surgical rubber glove. Surgery 64:541–543Google Scholar
- Public Health Laboratory Report (1980) Acute hepatitis B associated with gynaecological surgery. Lancet I:1–6Google Scholar
- Vaquero Martin FJ, Martinez Moreno JL (1986) Roturas inadvertidas del guante de goma en cirugia del aparato locomotor. Rev Ortop Traum 30 IB:367–370Google Scholar